Before pic related, what was considered the ultimate historical evil?
>>433422
The Mongols.
>>433422
Firstly, history doesn't consider evils.
Secondly fuckwits thinking about the past normally considered Napoleon to be the ultimate historical evil, promoted by English protestants and reactionary Catholics.
In early modern Britain it was Papal regimes, especially Spain. Then it was Napoleon. Then during the Great War it was probably the evil Huns.
In France I would assume it was Germany, especially after 1870.
And then of course Bolshevism was seen as an immediate threat to western civilization, especially after 1918 but also during the Second Internationale by many people.
Real life Disney villains thread. I'll start.
Cardinal Richelieu
>Made himself so essential to Louis XIII (he was a figurehead, holding near-supreme power controlled by his mother.) that when the Queen Mother tried to have Richelieu fired since he overstepped his position, the king had her exiled.
>Bought a shit ton of ships from the Dutch and besieged and blockaded the Huguenot port city of La Rochelle, with a population of about 25 thousand soldiers and civilians. He decided to bomb the shit out of the...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Philip II, easily.
His face, the events in the British Isles and the Netherlands, his demeanor, he comes off as a stereotypical 'evil' guy, even though he wasn't particularly immoral otherwise.
>>432451
Better image
Charles XII was a bit villainous, even though he fought the Great Northern War in defense. He drank nothing, felt no pain, fucked no women, and generally did nothing but conquer the shit out of the Baltic area.
All of our (Abrahamic) religious texts come via the direct communication, or divine inspiration, from God to a very narrow selection of prophets. Why doesn't God communicate more broadly?
If we're to believe these scriptures, we must follow very specific requirements or suffer God's punishment.
These requirements are often contradictory. The only reason we have for believing them is faith, but we're warned against following 'false prophets.' The implication is that we should trust one second-hand message but not trust other second-hand...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
The fact that people made him up and nowadays people ask for proof whereas back then they did not.
That is literally it.
>>431815
>What could explain God's silence?
God is not silent; he's just saying things that most people are in no mood to hear.
God is a /pol/ poster.
>still no hard evidenced miracles
>TFW you will never be a medieval European monarch
ITT: 21st century plebeian feels
>>431689
>you will never fight for the fatherland in WW 1
>you will never watch as your comrades get mowed down by allied machine gun fire
>you will never watch your friend get his brains blown off in a trench in Belgium, and have to clean bits of his brain off your coat
>you will never get both of your legs blown off by a landmine and be bound to a wheelchair for as long as you live
life is suffering
>>431689
>You will never be the only surviving monk of a monastery during the black death
>Tfw you will never be a minor noble and spend your days carousing around you land
>Tfw you will never get an arranged marraige w/ qt3.14 foreign noblewoman and have her raise your children
>Tfw you will never compete in a tourney or answer your lords call to war
New art history thread
Guess I shoulda opened with an edgy opinion about modernism
POST ART YOU FAGGOTS
Did any ancienct cilivizations except Hellenistic and Roman ones build realistic sculptures? What are examples? If they didn't, why?
>If they didn't, why?
Because style
>>431323
Africans (Yoruba), Chinese too I guess
>>431323
Only the Romans built realistic sculptures, Greek sculptures were always idealized images that cleared any imperfection of the person depicted. Greek artisans were actually freaked out that the Romans wanted an exact rendering.
Dumping what I have.
"thread for maps, cartography, GIS, human geography, historical geography, cultural geography, regional geography, critical geography, pomo geography, if it involves space and place and maps it's all fair game" t. other guy
May this thread never die
People nowadays seem to have this feeling that humor and comedy never existed before the modern era. Even thinking back to the relatively recent past (like the 1800s), lots of people seem to think nobody ever laughed. This is especially true of Medieval times, or Ancient Greece and Rome. It's like everyone was just pissed off, apathetic, or sad 24/7
So, to help illustrate this to not be the case, I thought we could have a thread dedicated to the things that made ancient people kek. It really brings a smile to my face to see these people in a new lightComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Some provincial man has come to Rome, and walking on the streets was drawing everyone's attention, being a real double of the emperor Augustus. The emperor, having brought him to the palace, looks at him and then asks:
-Tell me, young man, did your mother come to Rome anytime?
The reply was:
-She never has. But my father frequently was here.
A little Medieval humor next
>A Friar, who was but moderately considerate, was preaching to the people at Tivoli, and thundering against adultery, which he depicted in colours of the deepest dye. “It is such a horrible sin,” said he, “that I had rather undo ten virgins than one married woman!” Many, among the congregation, would have shared his preference.
>The father of a friend of ours had an intimacy with the wife of a downright fool, who, besides, had the advantage of stuttering. One night he went to...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
More Medieval jokes. I think I'll post some more ancient Roman jokes next. I would try ancient Chinese humor too but I'm not sure if they laugh
>A man who had given his wife a valuable dress, complained that he never exercised his marital rights without it costing him more than a golden ducat each time. “It is your fault,” answered the wife, “why do you not, by frequent repetition, bring down the cost to one farthing?”
>A Florentine I was acquainted with was under the necessity of buying a horse...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
What factors contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire?
>Rise of the Sassanians as a comparable military power
>Bloated bureaucracy needed to sustain bloated bureaucracy of military and tax collecting, which were necessary
>Corruption ate away at surpluses, causing taxes to have to be raised even more
>On top of all of this, Germannia was developing while Rome was stagnating
>Huns arriving causes massive migrations initially seeking Roman territory for safety (reasoning that only...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
What were the factors for it lasting so long?
>>425382
the goths and others adopted their military technology
>Christianity caused the Dark Age
It was caused the Dark Age because that is when black people became kings of everywhere in Europe. We lost a lot of information on it because whites didn't want us to know.
>>412871
>close down greek philosophical schools
>burn libraries
>overwrite ancient science manuscripts with prayers[1]
d-din do nuffin....
1. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/prayer-archimedes
>>412892
>we had calculus back than
Fuck Christianity.
I'm looking into early Greek philosophy and it's tragic how fucked up Christianity got us. Did you know Heliocentrialism was already a thing? Like it was a really early concept. The reason we got stuck with Geo-centralism is because the Christians couldn't stop sucking Aristotle's dick.
Is Environmental Determinism a racist discourse?
Racism is racist, and is something that emerged from colonialist ideology.
Unfortunately, the worst part of its legacy is the self-flagellation of anti-racism today.
According to most current geography professors, and textbooks. Geography classes right now are unanimously critical theory and based on an appeal to novelty fallacy. Part of this involves geography academics being vocally frightened by the revival of "old" ideas, i.e. environmental determinism, because they're associated in the critical mode with outdated ideas that are perceived as reversing social progress.
The usual example is comparing popular writers like Jared Diamond to Friedrich Ratzel, because Friedrich Ratzel thought environment shaped culture,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>407627
I haven't read much books on the subject but from what I know it seems like a perfectly logical conclusion.
Of course I believe it shouldn't be blown out of proportion though.
What is the history of religion? Who invented them? Why did they pop up?
>>380359
Ancient peoples who need someway of explaining the natural phenomena around them.
>>380359
In a broader sense, religion is an extension of tribalism. Yes, we might live separately, but if we believe the same things then maybe I can still trust you
Spooky shit is real, and ancient peoples needed a way to explain it.
Also, gods and spirits and shit are real, and they talked to people. That helped too.
>inb4 go back to /x/
YOU CAN'T SILENCE THE TRUTH
What are some /his/ approved nasheeds?
thread soundtrack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo_LNZPCgGI&ab_channel=SeverlothSeven
>pic somewhat related
>>438220
>>438222
Kek'd AND check'd.
>>438222
The tabs are bait.
Why is it easy for historical leaders to unite India politically, but not culturally or ethnically?
Why do Indian regional cultures focus so much on being special snowflakes?
Because Hindus are a bunch of New Age fucks who worship cows and believe insects are sacred.
>>437678
Can I get a non-meme answer
>>437681
I gave you a non-meme answer.
Their stupid and incorrect religion is why.