I just made this. Pls rate.
PS Poland sucks.
>>1066076
0/10 needs more diversity
8/10
Saved for later.
Why is this board so shit?
What did he mean by this?
He was a National Socialist. Combining Nationalism and Socialism together for the well being of the people who are part of the nations identity.Thus helping the people helps the nation. Not like today's socialism which is International Socialism.
>>1065482
The anti-capitalist rhetoric was just that - rhetoric. After the nazis came into power, they implemented a corporatist state. Not very many socialists would consider that to be a form of socialism.
>>1065502
He had to. Those companies were making his bombs and guns. Unlike International Socialism (Marxism) National Socialism was OK with free enterprise, so long as it benefited the people and worked for the state. "Corporatism", as defined by Mussolini, is exact that: the state overseeing free enterprise so it benefits the state, and not just for itself. National Socialists disliked capitalism because it was only interested in lining its own coffers, and could care less about society's needs. There for, it had to be coerced or controlled. International Socialists believed it was the source of all the worlds problems and had to be destroyed, along with the culture and civilization that spawned it.
By that light, National Socialism does seem far more rational.
this too wasn't enough
>>1065354
Was enough for the Eternal Anglo.
>>1065392
If it wasn't for that Eternal Anglo that literally saved them a century before.
Where the fuck do I start reading if I want to learn about ancient Canaan?
The internet seems to have few resources.
>>1065113
what do you mean by Ancient Canaan? Like pre-biblical? Before Judea popped up in there?
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1355285
>>1065118
>Before Judea popped up in there?
Yeah. Particularly interested in culture, mythos and religion.
Why can't we simply use the harshest punishment possible for every crime to eliminate criminality?
There would be absolutely no criminality if EVERYTHING would be punishable by death. (stealing, violence, littering, being a dick etc)
It would be so normal for people to avoid those negative things that it would become automatic.
>>1064726
because the administration of justice is a human system and is therefore prone to human error.
the second you kill a kid for shoplifting and it then turns out he didn't do it, you'd have riots.
besides, justice has to be proportional to the nature of the crime. some crimes are worse than others.
The concepts of fairness, justice, and mercy are more important to most people than a land with absolutely 0 criminality and the road along which you propose leads to tyranny and people don't like that either.
Launch Edition
-Server introduction-
/int/craft is back, the only minecraft server out there made by /int/elligents, for /int/elligents. Changes will be made to tweak the gameplay from previous iterations, while staying true to the classic /int/craft experience. Historic RP, Global, Towny and more will make sure of this. Timeline this time around will be 476 AD, set in a map centered around Europe (including the middle east and north africa).
The changes as listed below shall promote more dynamic, fun gameplay: memeraiding is nerfed, while isolation is also heavily discouraged.
Server Address:
intcraft.online
-Towny-
-Grace will be 1 week, first 24 hours PvP will be disabled.
SERVER IS 1.8.9. NOT 1.9 (!!!)
I'll be here to answer any questions you have
map for reference
http://worldhistorymaps.info/images/East-Hem_476ad.jpg
Rome Rises
Had deposits of aluminum metal existed and were widely available, how would they have impacted human history?
Would cast aluminum have been a viable competitor for bronze/iron in the ancient world for weapons and armor?
>>1064588
>Australia stronk
>>1064598
Bauxite isn't exploitable by premodern people though.
>>1064588
Aluminum is too weak, even cast aluminum, to make weapons or tools with.
I mean you could, but after a few uses they'd be worthless and unable to be used.
Why are Jews both a religion and a race?
>>1064422
Jews are not a race, but an ethnicity.
A Jew is an individual of the Jewish ethnicity.
A Judaic is an individual whose religion is Judaism.
>>1064426
/thread
>>1064426
>race
Considering that race isn't a biological factor but socially constructed Jews can very well be called a "race"
Also there's no distinction between culture/ethnicity and religion in Judaism, it's one and the same, even a Jew who doesn't believe in God but practises the culture is religious
Kind of neat that the Reconquista finished almost at the same time as the discovery of the New World.
What would the Americas be like if Iberia stayed Islamic? Would Central & South America be full of Muslims or would England/France get there first?
Muslim Spain had rich cities but low population growth
The Muslims in Spain relied heavily on their North African brothers to help them - but the rapacious Berber ended up taking over Muslim Spain did their part in bringing down that splendid civilization. It wasn't all the "fault" of the Christian conquerors.
>>1064387
I find it interesting that while Muslims were getting BTFO in a culturally important but distant region in the west, Christians were getting BTFO in a culturally important but distant region in the east. I'm sure Muslims see the Alhambra in the same way Christians see Hagia Sophia.
>>1064387
The Italian factor should not be underestimated. They were the prime movers of the Atlantic exploration business - they brought in the capital and the expertise, both commercial and technical
>call yourself the "wholly Roman Empire"
>not one Emperor is even from Rome
>most of the Empire is located outside of Italy
???
>call yourself the "Roman Empire"
>not one emperor is even from rome
>all of the empire is localted outside of Italy
>>1064279
>>1064276
>Call yourself Roman Emperor
>Descended from Spaniards
>Capital isn't even Rome.
>>1064290
>Call yourself Roman Emperor
>Born in Illyria
>Barely even lived in Rome.
>thousand year Reich
>Roman empire
>-500 BC to 500 AD
>Byzantime Empire
>500 AD to 1500 AD
>Holy Roman Empire
>900 AD to 1900 AD
Makes u think...
>>1064143
i want to punch you even though this is bait
>>1064149
Sorry, HRE was 800 AD to 1800 AD
Why didn't Eurobenises of the 1500's-1600's create new noble titles in the Americas and other """"""""uninhabited""""""""" places they colonized at the time.
Lots of places to be Duke/Count of Something.
>>1063967
They did, but there wasn't much.
Plus they have shit like encomienda which is basically like a feudal fief.
There was a good thread on /r/askhistorians about this
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/4bplqg/why_was_the_peerage_system_never_extended_to_the/
>>1063967
Brits and French didn't. Spain and Portugal did. The heir of Portugal's throne is called the "Duke of Braganza" and "Prince of Brazil."
In Spain, it's a different case. Some places had governors, but places with existing elaborate Aristocratic structures (i.e. Mexico and the Philippines) saw Spaniards promoting native nobility to lesser Spanish nobility called the "Principalia."
It was daughters from these aristocratic families that many Spaniards end up marrying. Hence Mestizoness is often equated with belonging to the upper class in those societies.
You're Poland in 1939. How to win?
>>1063949
Suicide. And the whole world wins.
with memes :DD
No chances whatsoever, no miracles on the Vistula this time.
What do you think of Napoleon?
>>1063845
I think France is a pretty cool guy. Eh kills coalitionsits and doesnt afraid of anything.
>>1063845
Literally saved Europe from another century of stagnation and absolutism.
greetings from waterloo ;)
Is suicide a moral problem?
Suppose that your morality encompasses not only your actions but the immediate effects that your actions would have on others.
So in the case of suicide, killing yourself might cause some anguish to other people as a direct result. So in that case it would be considered a moral problem.
>>1063836
What if it would bring joy to others?
Also how you evaluate the joy-misery it would entail?
Hedonistic calculus has some serious issues as a moral doctrine.
>>1063836
Everything everyone does is selfish anyway. Preventing someone from killing themself because it would hurt you is more selfish than the other way around.
