You get to send any person at any time in history a message, but it can only be 6 words long. Who and what?
Don't leave, reform Labour, sent 2016
>>852955
To any PCUS secretary after Stalin, Nikita for example.
"Invest in computational technology, you dumbfuck"
Napoléon
Do not invade Russia, the winter
Was he the single most influential European of all time?
>>852334
me
>>852334
Isn't it obvious?
>>852388
>not octavian
What is Western civilization?
Something that only exists when people claim it's threatened.
>>851472
Europeans
Was suburbia mankind's biggest mistake?
>>850772
Elaborate?
>>850772
Honestly? Not the biggest, but it's certainly up there. It's produced a lot of really negative side effects.
>>850776
Such as?
Without /pol/faggotry, what can /his/ tell me about the history of the Romani? What's some good reading on their culture and folklore?
>Roma thread
>Without /pol/faggotry
You're lucky if it stays at /int/
>>850520
Honestly, you can't ever talk about gypsies without /pol/faggotry. People who don't know them think they're those weird fortune tellers and circus artists from Dracula movies, and people who do know them check their wallets instinctively.
Were the Soviets the good guys, /his/?
Nah.
who is the greatest black intellectual?
neil degrasse tyson
michael jackson
Marshawn Lynch
>European cartography
How big is this in real life?
It's very good.
ITT: People who were never wrong, not even once
>>850109
Do you have that image but in an eviler saturation?
>>850109
Of course he was never wrong, he was a Sardinian.
Discuss
>>849597
Orgy-of-the-Will tier
In fact, the website is even directly ripped off from OotW
>>849597
Absolutely brilliant. Rei Koz shows an understanding of post-post-modern philosophy that makes him a colleague of Lacan and Zizek at his young age.
>>849620
>exile, discard two, and can't be countered for 3
yea, no. Discard two cards has always been 3 at sorcery speed, this should be 2BB or 3BB.
Prove me wrong.
Protip: history determines that you're not able to do so.
Israel, Spain
>>849373
>B-but muh Catalonia!
>>849409
Israel: kikes, never trust them.
Spain: anarchist revisionism. Totalitarianism disregarding human rights, and private enterprise.
How do we stop scientism?
>>849286
by killing all the scientists
>>849286
Distinguish it from real science at every possible opportunity.
We don't but you can try if prefer to live in Muslim theocracy under sharia laws.
I've been reading up a bit on Critical Theory and the Frankfurt School, and I'm getting a very "/pol/ was right" feeling from what I'm reading, at least as far as cultural marxism being intentionally pushed (not so much the worldwide kike conspiracy theories).
Is there any historical validity to the right's accusations about cultural marxism, and is it a threat to traditional western rationalism?
inb4 butthurt Marxists and Euros
What must be questioned is not the value of this or that economic system, but the value of the economy itself. Thus, despite the fact that the antithesis between capitalism and Marxism dominates the background of recent times, it must be regarded as a pseudo-antithesis. In free-market economies, as well as in Marxist societies, the myth of production and its corollaries (e.g., standardization, monopolies, cartels, technocracy) are subject to the "hegemony" of the economy, becoming the primary factor on which the material conditions of existence are based. Both systems regard as "backward" or as "underdeveloped" those civilizations that do not amount to "civilizations based on labor and production"—namely, those civilizations that, luckily for themselves, have not yet been caught up in the feverish industrial exploitation of every natural resource, the social and productive enslavement of all human possibilities, and the exaltation of technical and industrial standards; in other words, those civilizations that still enjoy a certain space and a relative freedom. Thus, the true antithesis is not between capitalism and Marxism, but between a system in which the economy rules supreme (no matter in what form) and a system in which the economy is subordinated to extra-economic factors, within a wider and more complete order, such as to bestow a deep meaning upon human life and foster the development of its highest possibilities. This is the premise for a true restorative reaction, beyond "Left" and "Right," beyond capitalism's abuses and Marxist subversion
>>848799
Holy shit I have Evola's nose
Will the Protestant Reformation be seen as the downfall of Western Civilization?
>Catholic Church plays pivotal role rebuilding Europe after fall of Rome
>becomes deeply engrained in Western Culture
>Protestant Reformation happens due to church corruption
>new branches convert the pious by pointing out how irreligious and corrupt church officials had become
>pissing match ensues between Protestants and Catholics to see who was the most Christian
>Catholic church, which had long endorsed good scientific discoveries, starts to hesitate, afraid of looking less Christian for not literally interpreting the Bible like the protestants do
>as science progresses, the churches look more and more backwards, pushing a rift between religion and science
>every charlatan and rube can start a new branch in the Protestant system, furthering the stereotype
>the religious become seen as either dumb bible-thumpers, or would-be prophets trying to get rich
>evangelical movements respond to growing degeneracy and irreligiousness in the West by trying to legislate their morality on everybody
>majority of Western society is in the full on hedonist stages in the fall of its Civilization
Now don't get me wrong, the church was absolutely corrupt and something had to happen, but it seems that once the floodgates opened and anybody was allowed to interpret old and metaphorical holy works however they saw fit, there was only one outcome.
>And since I cannot pour faith into their hearts, I cannot nor should I, force anyone to have faith. That is God's work alone, who causes faith to live in the heart...We should preach the Word, but the results must be left solely to God's good pleasure."
-Martin Luther
The difference between Rome and the Reformers was the difference between coercion and liberty.
>>847909
Not saying Lither didn't have good points, and the church certainly did some very bad things. I'm more interested in talking about how it was the Protestant Reformation that allowed Christianity to turn into how its seen today, i.e. the evangelical US churches.
>>847909
>Prepare to type up a serious response
>See a Jack Chick tract
>Stop
Even if that's true, coercion and liberty are not so much a dichotomy as a dialectic
>serbian ""empire""
lmao
Ancient finnish empire.
