I just had an insight.
The main source of problems in everything and everywhere is the fact that people are born in different times
Because of that, they'll be made into live and accept things that they have not created by themselves and most importantly, do not understand the reason of their existance.
The only solution would be to completely erradicate all history, culture and knowledgeable people, so that mankind can start over.
Maybe an ancient civilization figured this in the past and mankind is a result of this theory being put in practice. But we did something wrong and did not follow our original principles.
Discuss.
You now have to choose between Hegelianism and Marxism. This is an important decision. Choose wisely.
>>865336
I know Marxism is bedtime story for babies.
What's Hegelianism?
I'd like to see it summarized with from 5 to 30 green arrows.
>>865330
>i will never cum inside a middle schooler
honestly can one of you just mail me a helium tank thanks
Why did the Nazis rail against 'international capitalists' while receiving finances and materiel from them?
>>864640
Because the anti-capitalist rhetoric appealed to the populace while the capitalist policies appealed to the party and capitalists. Your pic being very related.
>borrow money and technology from big enterprises
>be in debt
>don't want to pay debt
>blame all your problems on big pharma and the jews
>???????????
>invade poland
>>864640
They got materials from the commies as well. They weren't really all that committed to their ideology, whatever it was.
What is this meme called?
Also can I get more pics like this?
>>864180
"Communism has never been tried."
Also, that image seems pretty good.
I wanna get one of these for Monarchism.
i have no idea of its name, but here you go a leftie
What do you think about immortality ? Is it something we should strive for, or should we be afraid of it ?
And if it is achieved regardless, what would it mean for philosophy ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01hbkh4hXEk
>>864025
Alex Kirkeegaard had a really interesting refutation for this type of stuff. Computers so far have ran on binary type of thinking. Computer thinking a series of variables given numeric values and a some Boolean
The human brain does not work like this. Wittgenstein showed us thinking is abstract and not boolian (as the postivists tried to assert).
So the idea of a computer emulating a human brain is not going to happen as long as we are still using languages derived from binary.
Immortality isn't possible, but we should strive to double or triple our lifespan. As a start.
Overpopulation is not a problem, as it's already happening now anyway, and as it's unlikely to be available for poor people and rich people don't reproduce. The real problem is social, it is to determine who gets to live. And the fact that this becomes a problem is a good thing, because it will force a positive evolution of society.
Philosophers will talk and no one will care as usual.
Even if we did it, then congrats - there's a robot copy of you!
And you're still going to fucking die.
What single man in history can be summarized as the greatest individual threat to the Roman Empire?
>>863844
genghis khan.
Jesus
marx
Give me one good reason why Kuwait shouldn't be a part of Iraq.
Because Saudis would have competition in the oil industry, and that's HAAAARD
>>863704
Because the Kuwaitis don't want it.
>>864060
That's relevant why?
Did the jews deserve what happened to them in WW2?
>>863435
What happened to them in WW2? Genuinely curious
>implying anything happened to the Jews in WW2
>>863446
they went into a summer camp in poland
Everyone criticises the main Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism and Islam) for their contradictions, violence, and promotion of "fearing" or "submitting" to God.
But there's not much criticism of the "Eastern" religions in the mainstream.
So what criticisms can you think of for Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism etc?
>>863362
well Sikhism was pretty violent historically IIRC but then again, it's partially descended from Islam
I can't think of any except Hindu varnas
Eastern religions are just more mature than petty semitic ones
>>863368
All the Sikh wars are were self defense against muslims
The Gurus say to protect the weak, oppressed, and helpless no matter what
How comes Christianity and Islam were so successful and replaced pagan religions whereever they met them?
Deus Vult
Universalism and Ummah
Organized > unorganized
What caused it to collapse? Can't find any reliable sources
>>862971
Göndöla spürdö xDDD
A lot of reasons actually but mostly the fact that OP is a faggot
>>862971
Racial inferiority
If evil Demiurge created the world, shouldn't man strive to do evil too?
>>862627
What is the difference between a demiurge and a semiurge?
shoo shoo, demiurge
>>862631
The "demi" in demiourgos comes from demos, not hemi.
Truly intellectual people - what do they do, how do they live their life? Do they kill themselves? Pursue intellectual interests or try to live the trivial life and just aspire plain happiness? Enter relationships? Become alcoholics?
I guess what I'm asking is not "what is the meaning of life", but "how should one pursue life"?
Philosophy in practice.
truly intellectual people such as myself spend all day doing nothing but enjoying the finest media, reading the greatest literature and philosophy and of course sacrificing at least six hours everyday sharing my immense intellect and wisdom with the ordinary people
"truly intellectual" people either go insane and kill themselves or realize that this will happen down the road and take steps to being more normal.
>that picture
Stalin was a rat and didnt look like this.
>>862546
Between the ego inflated fucks, idiots who believe they're hotstuff and actual intellectuals that won't bother answering directly I can only predict this thread will go to shit.
Never ever mention intelligence on 4chan. It's assuming so many things, you can be sure it'll only trigger shitstorms.
On a scale of Ceasarian to Democrat, what do you think was Nietzsche's preferred form of government?
>>862159
I don't have an answer but I'd like to read people's thoughts on this. What would be your answer OP?
>>862175
Considering his thoughts on the Ubermensch, it would probably be some sort of dictatorship, anything that isn't a Democracy would probably work though
"As little state as possible!"
Probably an aristocracy like they had during the Italian Renaissance
Nietzsche loathed democracy almost as much as he loathed socialism
Is there a philosophy that holds that: Because Humans are basically meat robots designed through evolution to self replicate that the very idea that they could ever hope to understand core universal concepts like truth, reality and existence is flawed?
Is there a philosophy that concedes that the very idea of human comprehension of inhuman truths is basically laughable?
I've tried researching into this but haven't found anything sadly
>>861794
fedoraism
>>861794
Probably not. It's not a very sensible position.
Why is being a 'meat robot' inconsistent with understanding the concept of truth?
What would Martin Luther think?
>>861500
Martin Luther would probably be a tripfag on 4chan.
>>861500
to smash that muthafuggin like button
>>861552
XDXDXDXD;D;D;D>XD>XD
![334629686_82533b5478[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/KWYxRZL.jpg "334629686 82533b5478[1]")
