The worst is Flavius Honorius

I hate Caracala

Constantine I the Renegade worse

>>828893
greece: hasn't achieved jack shit for 2000 years

File: 1457285977834.jpg (27 KB, 419x249) Image search: [Google]

27 KB, 419x249

bumps

Modern Greece is completely different than ancient Greece. I'm not even getting into genetics and shit like that, but culturally they're two radically different nations.

>>828853

White males being demonized and cast out of society. Glorification of layabout culture.

oi m8 ill fuk u up good rite, i swear by me mum
fooken bloody wanker

Urban poverty, drugs and incarceration. The exact same circumstances that led to black thug culture, only with white people. A good counterargument to any "only blacks can be niggers" argument.

They're people of the English working class sticking together. They're basically todays skinheads.

>>828154
They didn't manage to go full Mughal.

>>828154
They're still Muslim and angry.

>>828780
redundant desu

>What language did they speak in? Was it a language somewhat similar to today's Lithuanian?
The "Lithuanian" language itself only came to be in 1547, majority of the country spoke Ruthenian and Polish, some Dukes would speak German (such as Gediminas) since they were diplomats or of the such.
So yeah, majority of the country spoke mainly Ruthenian, a.k.a slav.
Any more questions?

>>827417
Grand Duchy of Lithuania is indeed a very interesting subject to discuss. As far as Lithuanians go, they were originally a pagan tribe which was quite good at waging war. As Ruthenian principalities next to it became weakened due to fragmentation and Mongols, Lithuanians managed to add them to their state. That's where the fun part starts.

Some historians, particularly Belarusian ones (though there aren't many of them because official Belarusian history basically starts and ends with WW2) outright deny...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>827417
The slavic lands were only held by and independent Lithuania for a relatively short time, and during the PLU and the PLC today's Lithuania would've spoken Lithuanian and the ruthenian parts would've spoken (You guessed it) Ruthenian

>someone pronounces Russia as Rasha

>>827339
vocaroo what you just wrote please

>someone autistically posts the same thread over and over

>>827312
Somalia isn't that corrupt honestly unless your a outlander.

>>827312
Corruption on those top5 countries are usually made in the open, its no big deal. Sweden for example, all top politicians in the govt have +10$ apt paid by unions paid by member fees, big scandal, now forgotten...
Theres so much public money being wasted in those countries, but people usually dont care cause living standards are still high, no1 bothers.

Intuitively it makes sense, but then you'd expect to see a correlation between the size of a country and level of corruption. I'm not sure I see that in that map.

>Which was more senseless?

What do you mean? Few human endeavors, if any, are senseless.

>Which had greater lasting effects on the world?

Impossible to measure.

>lasting effect

WW1 by far

>ancient monarchies evaporating overnight
>a huge chunk of central and eastern Europe partitioned into gorillion irrelevant microshitholes
>League of Nations and Wilsonian fucktardery
>rise of communism
>directly caused the rise of fascism as well

>>827093
>few human endeavors are senseless

Nigger are you retarded?

Except their equipment wasn't all that bad in WWII. Their tanks, for example, were superior to German tanks in many instances.

The whole "USSR did nothing but throw human waves at the Germans" is false, too.

>>827001
True, but you their good equipment was in too few numbers during the early years of war.
Most of the time it was shitty inter-war light tanks.

>>826996
>Poor communication
See Tannenberg
>Lack of fucking everything
While by WW2 one rifle per several people was mostly a meme that actually did happen in WW1
>Horrible logistics
Russians can't into them, not now, not ever.
>Shortage of supplies later on
And people say Lend-Lease didn't do anything
>No morale to speak of
There was mass jingoist...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

Also, feel free to recommend history YouTube channels.

>>826695
Wow, he sounds like a pretentious faggot. And he should burn in hell for that squeaky voice. Jesus Christ

>>826742
his voice is actually super deep in real life, it's sped up to not be disconcerting when paired with the animation

tell me if you want to see more pages from the album aswell

also, sorry for my english :c

>>826681
>Deliberately non-white, gay-ass rainbow Hitlers
>Visual record of gradual hyperinflation from jewsury
>Some boring-ass Nazi actually took up stamp collecting

what the fuck am I reading

WE WUZ: The religion.

Their claims are just as valid as some random Euros and Khazars cosplaying as ancient Israelites.

https://youtu.be/yet2Q0M32GQ

File: Ego Senpai.png (29 KB, 432x555) Image search: [Google]

29 KB, 432x555

About what?

Phenomenological non-cognitivism? Objectively, yes. This makes him more logically grounded and sound than almost any other philosopher.

Egoism? Egoism is a spook.

>>826322

A better question is, did Nietzsche read him?

>>826393
duh

Direct Hit 1

You answered "True" to questions 11 and 15, which generated the following response:

Earlier you responded that it is rational to believe the Loch Ness monster does not exist if there is an absence of strong evidence or argument that it does. No strong evidence or argument was required to show that the monster does not exist - absence of evidence or argument was enough. But now you claim that the atheist needs to be able to provide strong arguments or evidence if their belief in the non-existence of God is to be rational rather than a matter...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

Loving this biased test!

Perhaps instead of concerning whether or not a belief is rational, consider that humans are free to find truth in whatever they believe, whether or not it is rational.

So perhaps the Loch Ness Monster does not exist, yet if my religion is a traditional worshipping of his sacred existent in his lake, then his existence is truth whether or not he exists.

And thus when asked whether or not something is true or false, one's definition of true and false are subjective. To me, I think there could be sacred power, but I don't...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>826300
I took a hit so I started over and I made it through with no hits.

2 ez

The latter, I suppose. The "exoskeleton" is a machine, though.

>behaving like a normal

Let's imagine OP making non-retarded threads.

>>826170
Well, I needed to dumb it down, so you can understand the thread.