Why did the supposedly morally superior allies invade neutral Greece, instead of directly invading Bulgaria in the first world war?
>>577443
>believing anyone other than America had moral superiority in WWI
>>578022
>believing than America had moral superiority in WWI
>>577443
Because the Bulgarians BTFO the allies several times
> mfw listening to Dan Carlins' description of Verdun
Holy fucking shit, this has to be exaggeration. There's no way people could have gone through that without saying "nope, I'm out".
try reading about Stalingrad, it was basically Verdun with better weapons.
>>577319
>There's no way people could have gone through that without saying "nope, I'm out".
That's why they didn't
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Army_Mutinies
>>577319
did dan really say mozart was black though?
Fuck, /his/.
I'm under the impression he hasn't read anything other than Thus Spoke Zarathustra and the Republic.
https://youtu.be/BNYJQaZUDrI
>PBS
it all suddenly makes sense, the entire channel.
>>577131
This faggot belongs in a forced labour camp for making shit tier digestible "history" courses monetizing on the fact that people are lazy, ignorant, and have low fucking attention spans.
Go to class and read faggots, don't listen to this liberal nonsense. The best part is his attempts to be le impartial man is that it is anti historical and a political position in of itself.
Goddamn I hate clickbait especially when it's poisoning my favourite fiels
>>577235
>implying John Green == Hank Green
We are better than those /sci/ people, right?
Better how?
>>576868
>yes, good goyim, focus on the past, not on the future
Outside of Ottomans and the short mandate period, were Arabs ever under direct foreign rule?
>>576678
I assume you don't consider the peoples of the Levant to be "arabic" in your peculiar racial schema.
>>576678
Mamluks were also a bunch of turkic raiders i think
and before them were the Seljuks fuckin shit up
>>576678
The Crusader states, the Byzantines, Greeks, and Romans.
>He sent raiding parties to other areas and permitted his accomplices to take off as workers as many of these harmless and peace-loving people as they chose. They would chain their prisoners together so that none could slip the load of three heavy goods which he or she was forced to carry. On one of these occasions – and there were many such – of the four thousand prisoners who began the journey loaded down in this fashion not even six ever saw their home again, all the others being left by the roadside where they fell. And when a bearer flagged and became utterly debilitated and wearied by the enormous burden he was expected to carry and the shortage of food and lack of rest, they cut his head from his shoulders so they would not have to break the chains that held the line of prisoners together, and his head would fall to one side of the baggage train and his trunk to the other. You can imagine what effect this had upon his companions in misery. And, in time, as they came to realize that none of their people ever returned from pilgrimages of this kind, the impressed peoples would set out on such a trip with tears running down their cheeks, sighing and bemoaning their fate.
so, how isn't this a genocide?
>>576502
Do you want to fucking cite the source you quoted?
>>576502
you fucking imbecile, what am I to make of this wall of text without source?
ITT historical symbols that you like
Emblems that use keys and Celtic runes for me
>>576400
I like double-headed eagles and the Chi Rho.
> Celtic runes
There was no such thing, tbqhwy.
I also like the Lion of Judah.
Is the Monty Hall problem an idiot detector? Like, anyone who cares about it is just a try hard deep thinker right? Not even trolling. I was just thinking to myself, "I'm pretty sure if I explain the Monty Hall problem to someone and their first reaction is 'this is stupid,' then I'm probably not going to get along with them."
>>576266
Honestly it's just a really fucking stupid argument either way.
>>576266
>caring a solved problem
what does this even mean you fucking tryhard?
>>576266
The whole argument was stupid. Probability would adjust itself. I wouldn't say that it's an "idiot detector", as it is a "pretentious deep thinker detector".
what was the Cathar tresure at Montsegur?
and was Catharism the truest (to Jesus teaching) form of christianity?
>>576117
>what was the Cathar tresure at Montsegur?
A legend.
>and was Catharism the truest (to Jesus teaching) form of christianity?
Not likely.
Is Catharism the most retarded heresy? Or is that Skoptsy?
>>576117
>what was the Cathar tresure at Montsegur?
THE KNOWLEDGE OF SOFIA.
>and was Catharism the truest (to Jesus teaching) form of christianity?
ONE OF THEM.
Was South Africa really a first world country or is just a meme?
>>575945
Meme. It was first world for white people and absolutely nobody else, which means that the vast majority of people were not living in first world conditions.
Even today, white South Africans live much better lives and in first world conditions compared to the shithole that is the rest of South Africa.
>>575945
>first world
refers to US allied countries during the Cold War.
>>575945
If you were white.
Now they're equal, and it's a shithole for everyone.
What are some /his/ anime and manga? The two big one's that pop up in my head are Legend of the Galactic Heroes and Master Keaton. Have we made a /his/ list for weebshit, yet?
Chang Ge Xing is great, if you are into Pre-modern China.
>>575599
Here's a couple off the top of my head.
Kino no Tabi
Cat Shit One
Otoyomegatari
Thermae Romae
Vinland Saga
Fucking love these threads Zipang is good,Thermae Romae , Kingdom, there are some
Is suicide morally acceptable? If so, under what circumstances?
Unless you're religious then it obviously is morally acceptable.
>>575563
why is that obvious? are you suggesting that only religious people have moral objections to things? or is that only true for suicide in particular?
>>575582
Try telling us why is suicide morally unacceptable according to you.
Why most of third world countries are in the Tropic of Capricorn? Is it the hot climate that influence people?
in these regions the bananas grow abundant
the bushman can simply pick up the banana and dont think about tomorrow he has no natural enemies and only eats the bananas while white man is battlign the frost inventing the wheel + aryan technology
white superiorty in my opinion desu
>>575527
>geographic determinism.
Go read Wallerstein on world systems
Warm climate favors the development of life.
In a single Brazilian tree, you will find more insect species than you can have in all of Europe. In warm climate, resources are plentiful and thus life is easy.
Cold climate is related to less life essential resources. It's simply harder to survive there.
Cold climate, therefore, favors the development of intelligence and other skills. You'll need to learn how to use tools, the envorinment and, more importantly, your mind, to survive.
So now we have a tropical area where there is no natural selection for smarter individuals.
In the colder areas, there's natural selection for smarter individuals.
Smarter people, more developed societies.
Dumber people, less developed socities.
That's how Europe and North Asia got more developed than Africa and South Asia by hundreds of years in difference in the first steps of civilization.
This, however, does not explain anything past anything circa 2000 or maybe 1000 before Christ. After that, it's just consequence of that initial natural selection for human genes.
Also it doesn't explain how the southern cone and south africa are just that better than the rest of africa and south america. Australia is also an exception.
That's because of colonization.
Hello /his/, I need your guidance/advice.
I'm fairly new to this board and to history in general. I know the basics, but I want to know more. What really interests me is the general history of the 20th century (e.g. wars and everything related to them, literary and philosophical movements, important figures, politics, etc.). Nevertheless, ancient history seems very interesting also.
Basically my question is: where should I start? As mentioned, I'm new to this. Should I still start with the Greeks as everyone recommends?
Also, do you have any book recommendations?
Your help is much appreciated.
>>575329
Do you know what hermeneutics are? The difference between Althusser and EP Thompson on the nature of history? What Marxist class is? What "performance" of gender means?
Probably not. So you're below the basics.
Wallerstein on World systems theory
Kuhn / Lakatos on scientific revolutions
Needham on Chinese science
Unbound Prometheus on the industrial revolution
EP Thompson & Hammond and Hammond on the enclosures and production of class in the United Kingdom
>>575329
>military and ancient history
How to tell an autist from a mile away.
Start by majoring in history or just forget it.
>>575333
Thank you!
Is Analytic philosophy the only credible modern philosophy?
>>575311
No. There are a wide variety of respected philosophy journals that print continental articles.
It's a label that means little these days.
No.
