We do our best to define Fascism.
We all know about the Nazis being the most infamous example of Fascism, second comes the Italians. However there was also Spain, Portugal and Brazil being examples of other nations that experimented with Fascism, and came out much more successful than their communist brothers. Why is it that people are allowed to be Communists and not Fascists even though Fascism has a better track record and has killed less people?
I will try to lay out the "vanilla" criterias for fascism:
>Dictatorship
>Social Reactionary
>Can be economically left or right wing
>Focus on 'empowering the nation'
>Hate communists
I notice when Fascists are success, people refuse to acknowledge them as Fascists and instead as 'Conservative Dictatorships' in the case of Spain and Portugal. Are people that triggered to realize that Fascism can actually work unlike Communism?
Bumping with glorious Salazar, possibly the best Fascist.
Bumping again with Vargas of poverty. Pretty much responsible for the populist politics which plague Brazil today.
Bumping for the last time with Francisco "Franklin" Franco. Stayed in power for quite a while so I guess he could be considered successful.
Are there any interesting alternate history scenarios other than "What if Hitler won" and "What if Confederacy won"?
pic not related
What if Kim Jong-Il died in a car crash?
What if the USSR was never established?
What if god was one of us?
His how do I research the problem of intentionality?
For example If there is a guy and a girl that like each other but dont know the other one likes them back.
If one tries to maka advances they are risking getting hurt by a rejection but If they both telegraphed it because they were forced to then the problem would be solved.
Lets say they both had a gun pointed to their heads to be triggered if they did not convey their feelings towards one another, i.e. they were forced and it was not a matter of their choice.
This creates a win win situation where both parties know the intentions of the other but none has a reason to be hurt.
This is obviously an extreme example but there are many other examples which are similair but realistic.
I dont fully understand the mechanics of why the first normal situation creates a problem with possibly negative consequences and i dont fully understand why the later solution actually solves the problem.
Nothing?
Please help?
In all honesty OP is somewhat nonsensical
Spanish Civil War thread
Why did the western countries just sit back and watch a parliamentary democracy like their own be overthrown by a military putsch?
Shitskins aren't people
>>583368
For the same reasons they let Germany get as far as it did.
>>583386
Spineless appeasement?
Fuck generals. Who are the greatest diplomats of all time?
me
>>583219
Talleyrand.
Metternich.
>>583219
Obvious answer is obvious
Was he a crook?
No, the liberal elite just hated him because he exposed them as crypto-commies in the 1950s.
No hence "I am not a crook"
probably
Is atheism philosophical suicide?
Define 'philosophical suicide'
>Nazi
>Aithiest
nice joke anon
>>582947
>atheism is for people who endlessly play with concepts
That is philosophical suicide only accepting the atheists philosophy as "objective"
Is religion philosophical suicide?
No, religion is an answer that philosophy can't give us. Religion is for people who are tired to endlessly play with concepts.
>>582880
>Religion is for people who are tired to endlessly play with concepts.
That's what philosophical suicide means.
>>582873
religion is an umbrella term
Napoleon did nothing wrong
>b-but muh manlet meme
fuck your mother
>>582406
Borodino, bitch.
>Napoleon did nothing wrong
Well, he failed to take Hougoumont, for starters.
>>582406
But anon, he lost.
>one of the most grimdark, gruesome torture devices
>was made up in 19th century
what the fuck was 19th century people problem anyway? A fuckton of myths can be traced back to them I hate this era so fucking much.
>>582033
muh romanticism
muh poetic license
>>582033
Romantics.
They were a bunch of nationalistic emotional cunts.
I blame Walter Scott.
Here are the worst brutal torture methods the history. Check out the video for more information.
https://youtu.be/BHJ0-Lr5cHk
>>581942
iron maiden doesn't real
>>581942
Porn goes in /d/
According to what i heard the iron maiden is real.
http://phys.org/news/2016-01-genetic-ancient-trans-atlantic-migration-professor.html
nnifer Raff, a University of Kansas assistant professor of anthropology, said mitochondrial and genomic data that scientists have recovered don't support such an early wave of migrants.
"That hypothesis is only held by a very tiny minority of the archaeological community, but nevertheless it gets a lot of attention from people who have a casual interest in American archaeology," said Raff, lead author of a recent article in the journal PaleoAmerica on the issue. "When we summarize the genetic results we have, we find nothing that's consistent with these hypothesized trans-Atlantic migrations."
Raff and co-author Deborah Bolnick, associate professor of anthropology at the University of Texas at Austin, published the article that evaluated these hypotheses in light of current genetic evidence from ancient and present-day Native Americans. They concluded that genetic data scientists have recovered to date only supports a migration from Siberia into the Americas and does not show evidence of earlier migrations from ancient Israelites or inhabitants of what is now Europe. Within the next month, the journal article will available to the public via open access, Raff said.
The genetic piece of one recent argument for a trans-Atlantic migration—known as the Solutrean hypothesis—contended that the presence of mitochondrial haplogroup X2a in Native American populations provided evidence for ancient gene flow from Europe or the Middle East into North America. The hypothesis suggested that the North American Clovis culture dated roughly 13,000 years ago was directly descended from the Solutrean culture of southwestern Europe dated roughly 23,000 years before present.
Eurocentrists btfo yet again
Only conspiracy theorists and other retards believed it anyway
>>581774
>mitochondrial and genomic data
Yeah sure, like genocides have never happened.
Besides, genetics isn't even the core of the hypothesis here "debunked" by one man's academic opinion.
>>581774
So ingins didn't cross to America from Asia? Where did they come from?
Hi. I am gathering material and inspiration for my fantasy novel.
Was there ever a religion that preached only selected few are real human beings created by God and the rest are in fact just soulless philosophical zombies crerated by Anti-God to decieve them?
>that pic
are you that retard that was on Adam Wallace's podcast?
you're stupid and your ideas are dumb
>>581739
Judaism? Talmud says non-Jews are animals in human form.
>>581747
>Adam Wallace
Who? I just googled philosophical zombie to get a picture.
Meme Empires in history .
>>581639
Korean "Empire"
Holy
Basically all these 50 Empires created after 4th crusade.
Why did the Councils choose to permit marriage for their clerics, whereas the catholics did not? Could it be somehow related to Matthew 19:12?
Thank you
>>581579
> the Councils choose to permit marriage for their clerics
Did they? It was established tradition before Catholics decided to change it because Pope wanted more power over the Church. It's not about choosing differently, it's about keeping the tradition unchanged.
>>581601
Wasn't there a papacy long before the Great Schism finalized?
![native_american[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/yEmkt5K.jpg "native american[1]")
