If Stalin killed 60 millions people, population of Soviet Union would shrink. It is ridiculous how people fell for the western propaganda.
>>1161706
>If he didn't kill Xmillion he didn't kill any million
Holodomor
Fuck off
>>1161706
Not a very scientific infographic. While I'm not purporting that 60 million deaths can be attributed to Stalin it's an important detail they left out that the USSR annexed swaths of Eastern Europe during WW2 which invariably increased their population.
>>1161707
>implying famine killed 60 million people
I'll start
>Remember that life is made up of loyalty: loyalty to your friends; loyalty to things beautiful and good; loyalty to the country in which you live; loyalty to your King; and above all, for this holds all other loyalties together, loyalty to God.
-Queen Mary of Teck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy84N_U5jw0
Quotes are a spook.
Triggers are a spook.
Stirnerists are all spooks.
>All belongs to all. All things are for all men, since all men have need of them, since all men have worked in the measure of their strength to produce them, and since it is not possible to evaluate every one's part in the production of the world's wealth. All things are for all.
-Peter "the anarchist formerly known as Prince" Kropotkin
>>1160011
kek i know anarchos that actually get mad if someone refers to him as "Prince"
Because he was a retard like everyone in that part of the world.
Because you can't fuck with the Buddhists in a majority Buddhist country and expect to get away with it.
To protest the war in Vietnam.
What an iron constitution.
Which battles would you like to see?
>>1156457
Jesus (God's son) vs Muhammad (Satan's pawn)
>>1156468
What would be your reaction if Muhammad had the sickest rhymes?
>>1156468
Muhammad would behead Jesus, technically winning
I noticed that this board has a visceral distaste for Turkey and the Turkish people, why?
There is no way you can deny that the Ottoman Empire was a formidable Empire built on the intellect and prowess of the Turkish people.
Are you judging them by today's Turkey? If so, how come /his/ still likes China and Greece, despite their relatively despondent modern statuses?
Ottoman Empire thread
>>1155221
>I noticed that this board has a visceral distaste for Turkey and the Turkish people, why?
Literally every country that has interacted with them in the past hates them.
And they regions they controlled are less developed than the surrounding ones.
>t*rkroaches
>>1155247
No country has positively interacted with the Mongolians in their conquests and they were basically the USSR's pet dog for a while. Cant the same like I said be applied to Greece or China or Germany
>>1155270
In statesmanship almost every country cares by a longshot the most their own interests, just Turkey is more confrontational because the EU is more close knit with each other than it so it must take a stand the same way Russia does
France, Germany and Russia have all been parasitic and imperialistic towards mainland Europe, no
>>1150761
you actually made me google it you fucker
>>1150761
Second Mexican Empire.
You're forced to live in either Ancient Greece or Ancient Rome -- which one would you pick, and why?
https://www.strawpoll.me/10257545
I'd pick Athens over Rome, but Rome over Sparta.
Depends on which part of Greece.
>>1164245
What time period?
>>1164268
Athens at its peak
Western empire at its peak
>when you're talking to a STEMtard who hasn't studied the philosophy of science and he thinks he's the logical one
Dumb frogposter.
Eh, from my experience, history student can be very arrogant as well but again, so can everyone.
The only think I truly dislike in the majority of STEM students, is how far they'd go to try to justify their view as how human and social sciences are not sciences. At first it's funny, because they're clearly being ignorant, using double-standards and fallacies and the likes, but in the end it's just infuriating.
>>1157161
>whenever someone tells me science has "proven" something
So, on the justification of homosexual acts, masturbation, and contraception being sinful, here is what a Catholic told me:
>anything must follow the natural law otherwise it is a sin that goes against what God intended
>if you make yourself puke after eating without taking the time to digest, you're sinning
>quoting: "Sex must be procreative, in that the culmination of the act is anatomically oriented toward (not the same as "results in", or "has x probability of resulting in") new life. Sex must be unitive, in that it draws the couple closer together and fulfills their mutual duty of furthering each other's pursuit of virtue and ultimately salvation. Finally, sex must be marital, in that the couple must be united as one flesh through marriage.
Sex must be all three. Procreative sex that is done out of nothing but pure lust isn't licit, any more than non-procreative sex done out of genuine desire to provide mutual comfort is licit. But whether it's done out of pure lust or not will have no bearing on whether it's procreative, etc. etc."
Okay, that's fine, I understand.
Now, what is the justification behind this line of thinking? Which parts of the Bible explain this reasonment?
t. retard who wants to convert to Catholicism but has problems with homosex being a grave sin
Then don't convert. If it really bothers you that much, then Catholicism won't bring you the solace you're looking for.
>>1164419
>being a faggot
Anon no.
>The fall of the Western Roman Empire
>Protestantism
>WW1
>WW2
>EU
Why is Germany always trying to fuck up Europe?
>>1165544
Central position.
Its just the way of the German """""""people"""""".
They Hated Catholics and the French. They are one in the same, and both hold like what 75% of power in Europe so yeah.
how can there be free will when when all of our actions are determined by chemicals in our brains?
>>1159404
We're just shaved apes haha xD.
>>1159419
waifuism is a religion that picture is innacurate
How Can Free Will Be Real If Our Minds Aren't Real
Cyrus or Alexander? Who was more based?
>>1157908
Cyrus:
>Took down the Lydian, Medes, Babylonian, and Assyrian empires
>Created the first global empire with amazing administration that allowed it to survive for centuries
>Innovations in military and statehood
>Written the first human rights charter
>Blessed as a messiah by Jews and praised by the Bible and Quran
Alexander
>Took down a declining empire
>literally everything was handed to him
>Empire collapsed as soon as he died
>NO innovations
>Stylized himself as great
>Praised by armchair generals and 4chan neets
I think it's obvious.
>>1157908
Cyrus by a mile
>>1157908
Alexander was not "based", he was a good military leader. He was also a homosexual. So Cyrus.
Could anyone please explain the "Socialism goes against human nature" meme to me? Are they implying that human nature entails being selfish? Because from what I see being selfish is a much greater reason to support Socialism than any.
>>1156323
They're taking the reason the status quo is the status quo must be because that's the natural progression of being.
And in a sense they're right, capitalism is the logical progression of history, it's just not the last nor is it somehow totally consistent with "human nature".
>>1156323
>Because from what I see being selfish is a much greater reason to support Socialism than any.
Only if you are a retard,handicaped or a NEET. And I wouldnt be too sure about this either
>>1156332
>It is in my nature to exploit people and hold an abstract notion of property as sacrosanct.
You're a pretty shitty person then tbqh.
What's your favourite hymn, /his/?
>>1155837
1. From House to House, From Door to Door
2. Myriads of Millions
3. We are Jehovah's Witnesses
Cordero de Dios
Don't like the more uplifting version, the more melancholic version I used to hear in church when I was a kid.
>>1155837
ein feste burg
Fucking kek.
>>1153012
yeah i'm sure those numbers are totally accurate
>>1153048
Ahmed in SUICIDE WATCH
