What went wrong?
>>1168664
American Puppet, even today America just kills of our own puppets. We never mastered it.
His military was shit, Castro and Che were both extremely charismatic and popular as well as very effective and motivated guerilla leaders.
Its more of US vs Castro/Che than Batista vs Castro/Che. Good timing after WW2 and Korea the US could not have invested their own military force into this conflict.
>>1168730
Looks like Kramer
Bamp
Why isn't blatant Christposting banned?
How are people allowed to derail entire threads by mentioning something on the level of dinosaur bones being Satan?
Report and ignore, moron.
Keep moving
This is a board for the saved and soon to be saved
>>1168608
I am gonna draw a furry image because of that post, any requests?
Post underrated generals.
When talking about the Hundred Years War, everyone will spout shit about "muh longbow" and how the british somehow humiliated the french.
But look at this bastard, Bertrand du Guesclin. He managed to conquer back all of the lands lost to King Edward III by using guerilla tactics. This fat, ugly breton midget managed to save Paris at Cocherel, overthrow the government of Castille, and crush the british by avoiding large battles and instead using dirty tricks to besiege the castles.
There's a story, for exemple, about how he once disguised his soldiers as englishmen to take a castle in Normandy.
>>1168369
>how the british somehow humiliated the french.
Killing a third of your ruling class in a single battle where you have numerical superiority is fucking huniliating.
Dysentery is the only thing that kept the english from the French throne.
>>1168369
Underrated?
Wasn't he literally made Marshal of France?
I think you mean unknown to plebs.
>>1168379
>killing a third of the ruling class
To the average frenchman that was the best thing to happen in the war.
What are some things he was right about?
nothing communism doesn't work!
>>1168327
Idk, he does have a great beard
Basically everything.
Was it autsim?
>>1168133
Probably. I mean they fucked their own siblings back then. Somethings bound to be messed up.
No. It was monotheism.
>>1169143
but that's the same thing
Nearly all living things are just brains of different advancement levels using bodies as meat puppets to experience existence
Each and every one of us is trapped inside a skeleton.
>>1168045
The difference is that humans are sentient. We are getting closer to synthesizing better brains and more efficient puppets from scratch.
>>1168052
Literally what makes you assume that only humans are sentient?
In the early 20th century, Sigmund Freud posited sexual repression causes a plethora of social and mental ills, prompting his advocacy for liberation through sexual freedom. The concept was further developed by other intellectuals, with Wilhelm Reich being an important one who also worked on ideas for sexualizing the clergy to destroy the influence of the Church, which he saw as an "International antisexual organization" and one of the pillars of "Fascism".
With the rise of film came the vehicle to widely appeal to humanity's basest instincts. Porn production began with the advent of film (see "stag films"), but if the films weren't destroyed due to human error (especially with regards to the flammability of celluloid), the police routinely confiscated reels or interrupted performers, and with no official distribution outlet, most of them never saw the light of day.
As America enjoyed post-war prosperity, enter Hugh Hefner, who began pushing lascivious material wholly supported by wealthy Jewish businessmen in the '50s. To further her career ambitions, Marilyn Monroe converted to Judaism and, shortly, she was featured on Playboy's magazine cover. Jews and Protestants were, to some extent, allied during this period and are still today for different reasons.
In the '60s, Hollywood producers put tits into exploitation films (particularly in Holocaust and Nazisploitation films) which opened the floodgates to filmed pornography. Within a couple of years you have hardcore porn all across US cinemas as "freedom" while the Church gradually lost its cultural clout in putting a stop to Judeo-Protestant influence. At the same time, you have the more general sexual liberation movement, largely led by Jewish men (anti-capitalist intellectuals and businessmen alike), certainly inspired by psychoanalysis, but also involving someone like Kinsey (a Protestant) and the Rockefellers (also Protestants). No women were involved here.
Feminist opposition to porn started to develop throughout the '60s and '70s, spearheaded by women like Brownmiller, Dworkin, Steinem, and continuing to this day with Jewish women like Ariel Levy, Gail Dines and many others. The earliest known feminist analysis of pornography posits that it fundamentally degrades and objectifies women, inflicting material and moral harm on both women and society at large. Radical feminists like Dworkin, Jeffreys and MacKinnon echoed this theme in opposition to the sexual revolution and formed the bulwark against it.
As the "war on sex" raged on, postmodernism flourished with men like Foucault, Lacan, Derrida and others. By the '80s, this movement inspired certain women to challenge their views on sexuality, pornography, prostitution and transsexuality that dominated second-wave feminism. They were seen as "conservative," outdated and ultimately contradictory, but most of all, "sex negative", which was a lost cause because pornography had already won the culture war. So they developed a deconstruction of these second-wave feminist ideas that was more compatible with capitalism and male sexual desires expressed through pornography, ushering in third-wave feminism (starting in the late '80s/early '90s). As the ideological inverse of the second wave which actively promoted pornography and sexualization as liberation, the third wave was warmly welcomed by pornographers and other elites.
K.
What is love, /his/?
baby don't hurt me
don't hurt me
no more
Alt history thread.
Post maps, stories and theories related ITT.
>Lybia owning most of N. Africa
>Bulgarian south coast
>Independant Constantinopel/Instanbul
>Ukrainan-speaking parts of Ukraine in Russia
>That Poland-German border
This map makes very little sense
>Chez republic
>Chez
>croats controlling serb majority part of bosnia
>serbs controlling croat and bosniak majority parts of bosnia
World War 1 thread
Why were anzacs used in the gallipoli campaign?
>>1167091
Maybe cause they where used to the desert. Just a random guess
>>1167091
They were worth less
so if the Angles, Saxons and Jewts are Germanics that migrated to England who the hell were the Vikings? Leftofers of the above?
>>1166868
>who the hell were the Vikings
Other people entirely.
The vikings were a second wave of Germanic settlement of England
>>1166868
Angles, Saxons, Jutes, and Frisians were west Germanic mostly
Norsemen were north germanic
How and why did Britain lose its Empire?
The Jews.
>>1166693
The British reasoned that there's no point in going all the way around to world to take care of their negroes and Indians, so they invited them all in London.
What's his name again??
>>1165847
Adolf Hiedler?
Herr adam hiedenberg rothschild
The man with the funny mustache.
Did the French ever make much of an attempt to convert the Muslims in their colonial clay to Christianity?
eh
>>1165667
We taught them that their ancestors were from gaul and most muslims drank alcohol before the independance and now the radicalization.
I think its quite a success
Yep, Guiana, Polynesia, Guadeloupe, Martinique... Everywhere but the lost clays in fact.
Is George Frost Kennan the greatest diplomat in recorded history?
Sorry, gonna have to be Talleyrand.
Metternich, Bismarck or Talleyrand
>>1163893
clearly this. Was Kennan the best American though?
