Thoughts about him?
Best Roman emperor
>>1168528
>spends life making uniting parts of Europe in to a big ass empire
>divides it back up after his death
Good job mate
He was illiterate, so there's that.
Post art.
Today I will remind them.
What's the correct answer?
Schrodinger's trolley.
>>1168268
Im not sure I understand. Am I to assume that if I have the trolley hit the trolley inventor, that there is some damage to the timeline?
>>1168278
If you hit the trolley inventor then the trolley wouldn't exist causing a paradox since without a trolley he couldn't have died.
If you hit your grandfather you also cause a paradox because then you wouldn't exist to flip the switch.
/his/ does your country have any legendary sleeping king/hero waiting for the right time, in a time of need, to wake up and lead your country to a new golden age?
Like King Arthur or Charlemagne?
>>1168127
OP here
Here in huezil we have, or at least uses to have, Dom Sebastião some portuguese prince who went missing against the moroccans which led to the creation of the Iberian Union because he had no heir
Yes, St. Wenceslas. Of the carol fame.
I didn't know charlemagne was supposed to come back.
But it's been said that the Commune isn't dead.
>>1168011
Because liberal back then didn't mean what it means in the modern USA. In fact, in Europe it doesn't mean what it means in the modern USA either, liberals are in the right.
>>1168011
I've never heard napoleon described as a liberal in my entire life.
>>1168022
He expanded liberalism to pretty almost all europe.
>please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago
I wish we could make this 100 years so we don't have to deal with communist subhumans, naziboos and all kinds WWII and Cold war retards.
>>1167864
The Cold War is fun though.
Really, the problem was japmoot slapping "and Humanities" to the history board.
>>1167864
But that causes us to miss out on all sorts of relevant humanities, anon. Ideology and philosophy changed a lot in the 20th century.
Are there any books or articles about how logical fallacies are wrong? People always say I use them when I argue with them like I'm automatically wrong, but it always seems like a dumb copout response.
>>1167811
how logical fallacies are wrong?
that doesn't make sense. but using a fallacy doesn't make you incorrect, it just means that your argument is invalid.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
>it always seems like a dumb copout response.
Or it's you who're bad at arguing and reasoning.
>>1167811
>People always say I use them when I argue with them like I'm automatically wrong,
Get off reddit then.
Nobody I know uses "fallacy" spam. If anything just say "the fallacy fallacy dictates that fallacious reasoning does not make a conclusion false".
What's with the Palestinians who stayed in the west bank and Gaza, why didn't they just all move to Jordan like everyone else?
Not everyone likes Chicago.
Why didn't Jordan annex the west bank?
>>1167720
it did but then Israel occupied it during the six day war and now you have the current situation
What's the difference between an emperor and a king?
>>1167614
An emperor is a king of kings
>>1167614
Size of realm.
>>1167614
Fancier title.
Which race was Caesar ?
>>1167266
He was a king
>>1167266
Tanned white.
>>1167268
>Dictator
>For
>Life
Holocaust anyone?
>>1167007
If Holocaust happened, then how come we didn't burn all Germans after WW2?
Checkmate, atheists.
>>1167007
Anyone who knowsif thisone is true or not?
>>1167007
>camps inspected by us
What does this mean?
Now that the dust has settled, can we agree that he was fucking based and that most of his ideas are genius?
Why do people hate him so much?
Look at that ugly face
>>1166983
His ideas tend to not do well for the reputation of a very popular religion. That seems to be where the whiniest posters come from.
>>1166983
>Why do people hate him so much?
because most people are the last man
his arguments must be hated by the slaves whose subjugation he points out
anything other would necesserally contradict the nature of the ubermench
Thoughts?
What did he meme by this?
Pure filosofia
Intentionally obscure to mask his lack of real insight.
Plus his aesthetics are shit, vaporwave is garbage for stupid teenagers.
What's the /his/ opinion on MASH? Book, Movie, and Show opinions
>>1166916
>Book
Didn't read it
>Movie
Hilarious. I give it an 8/10.
>Show
Too pinko for my tastes, but it has its moments. Solid 6/10.
>>1166916
>Book
Haven't read it.
>Movie
Great.
>Show
Exactly pinko enough for me, 8/10.
>>1166916
TV show was pinko because it was an allegory for the ongoing War in Vietnam.
I grew up overseas in the Middle East and it was always on after school. RIP Col. Blake.
![51dJmqhcAwL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/YvDlXtN.jpg "51dJmqhcAwL. SY344 BO1,204,203,200 [1]")
What do you think of the idea of religion as a memetic virus? Of course the idea is not new, but usually the analogy is used in a critical way, as an attack on religion.
What if we view modern major world religions as a huge memetic symbiotic viruses, that largely evolved to INCREASE the fitness and competitiveness of societies (not necessary individuals) they infected - because that allows these societies to more effectively spread the virus further (prozelityze).
We can view all the holy books and writings that stood the test of time as additional libraries and modules of a virus that serve as sort of patches hijacking basic human "firmware" that we evolved as prehistoric hunter-gatherers and using it for new purpose. A simple example - monotheistic anti-idolatry "module" that serve tu supress our innate spirituality (pantheism/ancestor worship) and rechannel it in such a way as to allow us to organise in much larger and complex society (that can propagate the virus that much more effectively).
>>1166863
You could say this is true of literally any ideology. You could even say that the idea of ideology as a virus is itself a new virus.
>>1166928
>You could say this is true of literally any ideology
Yes, but to effectively infect our minds an ideology must have a way to profondly affect us on an emotional level. Religions mostly play on out greatest fear - fear of death and our greatest hope - having an afterlife without suffering. Often they introduce an additional idea - some sort of hell/afterlife retribution, this serves as an additional motivator to submit, introducing the fear that even death might not be an escape from suffering if we don't do as we are told.
You can see these ideas in one form or another in all the major religions. Religions without the concept of afterlife are simply not competitive judging from their influence and the number of adherents.
>>1166928
Came in here to post this.
I like you anon.
![Alexandre_Cabanel_002[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/zW27pUQ.jpg "Alexandre Cabanel 002[1]")
