If Hitler listened to his generals and left Berlin when the soviets attack, what would be their next plan?
>>1018395
>their
The Nazis or the Soviets?
>>1018399
Oops. I meant the Nazis.
They probably would've betrayed him and surrendered to the brits/americans.
Seems like half of Irish look tanned and Mediterranean, Spanish, Portuguese, Greek looking, while the rest are very light skinned and look almost Nordic. Why is this?
>>1018235
The darker ones are the indigenous peoples, the lighter ones are Celtic/Norse/British
The ones that look like Colin Farrell are descendants of the original Iberian population the other ones are descendant from a later Germanic-Celtic population which supplanted the native darker ones.
>>1018235
The ones that look like left are descendants of the Tuath Dé, the ones that look like the right are the descendants of the Fomori.
Who /scythians/ here?
>>1017654
Sauce on that manga.
I wish I could dress like a gnome
>>1017659
Sauce?
>>1017664
Debased Hellene pls go.
If you could change a single event in the world history, no matter how big or small, what would it be?
>>1019780
With a thread like this, you're just asking for /pol/-tier replies.
>>1019780
I'd make it so that this thread was never posted.
>>1019780
4chan is never created.
Or the Bronze Age Collapse never takes place. That would have some of the biggest effect I think. All the languages would be different, Western and Eastern culture as we know it wouldn't exist. Technology would probably be radically different too.
How does a rag-tag volunteer army in need of a shower somehow defeat a global superpower?
Seriously, how?
>>1019670
Ill paid scum of the earth from colonial settlements in red uniforms vs. ill paid scum of the earth from colonial settlements with Prussian military training.
>>1019670
France
>>1019670
French arms, french ships, a french European distraction, and an ocean limiting response time.
what /his/torical fantasies do you have?
I personally spend at least an hour before bed fantasizing what it'd be like to ride the steppes and conquer the world under one banner
I spend time dreaming about being a well to do during Le Belle Epoque.
Taking some whore from nam back to the United States
I sometimes have historical fap fantasies along those lines
>>1016731
Being a Britbong sailor in the 18th century, sailing across the Pacific and trading iron nails for sex with hot Polynesian girls, all without having to fear scurvy.
Post your favorites.
>Handled the Mexican-American war wonderfully, annexed the entire southwest of the US
>Negotiated the acquirement of the Oregon Territory
>Reduced tariffs
>Had no personal motives behind running for president
>Issued the first postage stamps
>Accomplished all of his main policy goals in one term and didn't run for reelection
>>1016173
I mean he didn't rerun cause he was dying
>major fuck ups. changed the republic for the worse
FDR, LBJ, Woodrow Wilson, Andrew Johnson
>mid tier fuck ups.
Reagan, Bushes, Clinton, Obama
>minor fuck ups
truman, hoover, Andrew Johnson
>honorable mention
the congress and state governments that passed prohibition
>>1016197
He died of cholera 3 months after leaving office
He had also pledged not to run for reelection in the past
Let's start a thread about badass saints and stupid saints.
This badass Saint with an axe is Saint Boniface. He chopped down Donar's Oak as a fuck you to the Norse God's. But for some reason, despite being pictured with an axe he's not the Patron Saint of Lumberjacks. That's some asshole named Saint Gummarus who was some noble in a horrible marriage who left his cunt wife and lived as a hermit.
>>1017638
Here's a picture of Gummarus, notice he's not holding an axe
>>1017638
How about Martin of Tours who called down angels hold back a crowd of rustic pagan scum so he could burn down their temple. And then they all saw the glory of God and praised him. well until like most early converts they held onto old superstitions and other idols that hadn't been destroyed by the local saint in the making. post-Constantine Christianity is full of this shit desu. christianity is of meek and mild Jesus indeed
>>1017661
A better one is Saint Guinefort. He's literally a dog that a nobleman left to look after his newborn while he hunted. When he came back the crib was flipped over and the dog was covered in blood, wagging his tale. The noble killed the dog only to pick up the crib to find his baby, unharmed, next to a dead snake. Despite the Vatican's efforts to purge this cult people still venerate Guinefort until the 1930s
Who was in the wrong here?
>>1015487
Marius held too much power, and wanted even more. Sulla just wanted his army from his consulate.
>>1015497
Yep. This is something that so many people don't seem to get. Rome was completely in the hands of traitors who had usurped her legal government, with all power in the city extralegally resting in the hands of two men, one a tribune of the plebs (Sulpicius Rufus) and the other a mere private citizen (Marius).
What should Sulla have done, let command over to Marius and allowed himself to be exiled or massacred by Marius and his supporters, as so many others were? Fuck that. Sulla fought with Rome's fighting men against Marius and his slaves and hired ex-gladiators to take back the city.
>>1015487
Well, Marius wanted Rome for himself when Sulla tried to heal a decadent Republican regime. Sulla was a man from the past, when Marius understood the future of Rome.
#TeamSulla tho, I admire what he did for Rome and his sacrifice.
Why are the Gospel's accounts of Jesus's so sketchy?
*Writings began 40-80 years after his death
*Extremely low amount of detail, especially at his trial. Mathew's Gospel for instance only has one spoken line by Jesus and the trial is over in a a few sentences
*Accounts contain contradictory information. In some Gospels we are told Jesus remained silent through the entire trial, while in John's Gospel he is giving a big speech. The number of people in various scenes change
*Gospel tell us the trial was not a public, making something as detailed as John's Gospel suspect (espcially when it's written 40+ years after the fact)
*Gospels were written anonymously, probably not by the proclaimed author. The church just had to make a guess at who wrote what. It's generally accepted 3 out of the 5 Gospels are actually multiple documents by different authors copy-pasted together. The 4th &5th John and Thomas contain very different portrayal of Jesus, escpially at the trial. John's trial is unlike any other and Thomas skips the trial completely.
>In contrast look at the accounts of Socrates which is 500 years earlier, yet the information is preserved far better and in a manner far less sketchy.
*Writings about him began within the same year of his death.
*Extreme amount of detail given, Phaedo gives more details about one day of Socrate's life than all 5 Gospels give about Jesus's entire life combined.
*All the accounts match up even down to small details.
*All the witnesses were confirmed to be at the trial and jail, both of which were public events.
*Writings were not anonymous and indisputably written by the proclaimed author
>>1017402
DUDE JUST READ AQUINAS ITLL ALL MAKE SENSE LMAO
>>1017402
>Why are the Gospel's accounts of Jesus's so sketchy?
They aren't
>>1017402
Because as a historical figure he probably did not exist, and even if he did he was such an unimportant personage in his own time as to warrant zero record even in the relatively advanced recordkeeping Roman Empire. He was as known worldwide as a random ISIL organizer was today to put it in context.
Lets learn and share Architecture of the indigenous people.
This is El Tajin site, from the Totonac people
City is from 900 a. C
How it would have look back then
"Kåta"
Constructed by the indigenous people of Scandinavia.
Rather good for a Nomadic people north of the polar circle.
Was he right about Germans?
>jew is anti-white
what a surprise
Heaven brings forth innumerable things to nurture man.
Man has nothing good with which to recompense Heaven.
Kill. Kill. Kill. Kill. Kill. Kill. Kill.
>>1018854
First anti-whites were Germans though.
Why don't we have direct democracy /his/?
Parliamentary arguments against direct democracy are a farce. If the people are "unable to rule", then there are some who are more able to rule than others, which undermines the idea of democracy itself.
If the people are logistically unable to rule - but wait, in modern times that's just false.
Direct democracy is long overdue already, and there are a million ways of smoothly implementing it. Direct democracy now!
>>1018587
I don't want to think about that kind of crap
>>1018587
Also, the majority of the population is fucking dumb, I'd rather we pick a handful of men who specialise on leadership and administration management and rotate them before they get greedy.
Fuck your direct democracy
>>1018672
>doesn't notice how paradoxical his post is
We needed a recommend reading list edition
>>100119
The Wealth of Nations- Adam Smith
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money- John Maynard Keynes
Economics 19th Edition- Samuelson and Nordhaus
Capitalism and Freedom- Milton Friedman
Capital in the 21st Century- Thomas Piketty
>>1001545
Seems a little biased.
>>1001559
How so?
>ctrl+f
>no alt-history thread
And it looks like there hasn't been one in a while, too.
