Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 243. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
>There is perhaps no greater contribution one could make to contain and perhaps even cure faith than removing the exemption that prohibits classifying religious delusions as mental illness. The removal of religious exemptions from the DSM would enable academicians and clinicians to bring considerable resources to bear on the problem of treating faith, as well as on the ethical issues surrounding faith-based interventions. In the long term, once these treatments and this body of research is refined, results could then be used to inform public health policies...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I wonder if he supports the re-inclusion of homosexuality, a condition that was removed due to social pressures and not scientific assessment.
![[Trigger warning].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/LevnsZL.jpg "[Trigger warning].jpg")
This idiot doesn't understand psychiatry, psychology, mental illness, or religion.
what do they mean?
in what way was it "degenerate"?
Was it worse than the rest of Europe at the time?
Only stormfags say that
>>1273764
Germany harbored libertine sexual attitudes since the late 19th century. Even during Nazi rule, they didn't really go away. Nazis didn't care about female promiscuity as long as it made more Aryans
>>1273764
The first porn industry was invented here.
https://www.darkmoon.me/2013/the-sexual-decadence-of-weimar-germany/
Hey /his/ - wanted to know where this medal is from. I can guess that it was most likely WW2, It's got Latin on it and I've looked around the web for what I can but I can't seem to find out what it is.
Help, please?
>>1273712
HOLY SHIT OP THAT'S A RARE, IT'S A CRUSADER MEDAL
>>1273724
Whats a Crusader Medal?
>>1273738
A medal from the crusades
How do I learn more about the Rockefeller republicans.
I don't need the watergate story.
I want the stances and policies they proposed and accepted.
Autiobiographies
Any good books besides Nixon's own published works?
>>1273026
Nixon wasn't a Rockefeller Republican.
He was a moderate between them and the Goldwater/Reagan wing.
>>1273036
Nixon is often mentioned among them, though he ran against Rockefeller.
I agree slightly.
But he's way closer to Rockefeller than he was to Goldwater and Reagan.
Though Reagan ultimately was also completely different than what Goldwater was.
>>1273174
look up nelson rockefeller's stances and google "list of rockefeller republicans" i'm assuming they're socially progressive, economically neo-liberal
How does Islamic theology and historiography explain Christianity's globe spanning spread and dominance?
It doesn't. That's why muslims are so asspained.
>>1272906
Is that a Chinese guy summoning dragons?
>>1272906
Soon it won't need to.
Historically speaking, has the Caucasus region been considered part of Eastern Europe/Christendom or not?
What have the locals considered themselves?
>>1272879
Georgians and Armenians are pretty into the whole Christianity thing, obviously, and they were heavily influenced by the Byzantines. I don't know what they considered themselves, though, and Asian border used to be drawn at Tanais/Don by Greeks so calling them European is quite a stretch, though they're no steppe niggers or ragheads.
These days Georgians consider themselves Eastern European because politics, Azerbaijan uses balancing policies and sells resources to everyone so they're """Eurasian"""...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Europe is a minoan women from a fable brought to popular use in the 15th century to describe western asia, genetically and culturally they are not central europe though they share a common ancestor
>>1272879
It spent most of it's history controled directly or indirectly by middle eastern powers and they're under the rivers that traditionally ended Europe according to the greeks who invented the notion. So there's that.
Christendom =/= Europe at all. Ethiopia was never european.
>Midway was 76 years and 4 days ago
Could the Japs have won Midway if Zuikaku and Shokaku were with the Kidou Butai?
For the record Zuikaku and Shoukaku were undefeated against the Americans until 1944.
>>1272770
Define"win"
it's not like America knew everything the IJN was up to throughout the Pacific war. But I'll bite.
Say Japan's plan went perfectly well. The attack on midway goes with out a hitch. Great.
Now Japan has to take pearl harbor.
And Australia.
And let's not forget their own version of the eastern front, China.
Plus, Midway was such a cluster fuck for Japan because A: America had time to build up a huge amount of AA guns, and B: Japan wasn't expecting...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1273311
They don't have to take Pearl Harbor and Australia to win Midway m8. Don't be retarded.
>A community of two Jews would need three synagogues.
What did he mean by that, /his/?
Jews present themselves to the goyim as divisive, so we won't suspect that they will act as an united group in their first chance to get absolute power to slaughter the "kulak".
Jews are rhetorical and like to bullshit with each other like academics do
>>1272693
Also camouflage
>>1272734
My last name is Osborne
I went through my ancestry and discovered I am mostly Ango-saxon and Gaelic Scot, but I am not a degenerate Viking-boo, other than praising the shit out of european ironworking.
I want to be a roman mercenary
ITT: You convert me to romeboo-ism
pictures, awesome roman victories over degenerates, awesome inventions brought by romans, architecture, awesome roman laws, all of it
>>1272524
>I want to be a roman mercenary
You're a bit late
Shouldn't need a boner to convert
also you aren't allowed to romeboo if you are ginger or sven colored
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Trebia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcA_eCY6B0w
rome boo
So when Jesus cried out " My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" Did he do it in Hebrew or Aramaic? Why can't Mark and Matthew agree on the point? And why were they both included in the canon when one has to be wrong?
>>1272415
He said it in both you heretic. One after the other.
>>1272428
>and now, for everyone assembled who doesn't know their Hebrew, I'll say it again in a different language. Try to pay attention this time.
Not really buying it anon. Why say it twice and not the other "last words" that Luke and John give?
Han sa det på norsk, som er skrevet i Bibelen.
People who don't deserve to be called Great.
He was a prince of a tribe of barbarians who took down the world government at the time. He then became the husbando of every European leader since.
>>1272302
He took down this world government when it was at its lowest point internally. You can't even compare him to Cyrus who was a much better ruler, but unlike Alexander, he didn't have a bunch of propagandists his disposal after his death.
>>1272316
The ancient world didn't see it that way.
No one cares about gradual declines. They care about the individuals that caused clear end points.
I hear lots about Nation and City states and so on which I don't really understand so I was wondering:
What types of states have there been throughout history?
What are there pros and cons?
What is (in your own opinion and/or historically) the perfect form of state?
Well, your first few questions are easy to answer. There's been tons of different types of societies in history. As for pros and cons? We're still debating that even in this era.
As for what I think is best? Meritocracy. Barring that, synarchism.
There is no perfect form of state like there is no perfect form of life.
>>1272090
Do states only change depending on scaling (For example a Democratic City state or Meritocratic Nation state) or is there another component such as composition or function that changes there classification like a meritocratic state as you said?
>>1272093
Surely depending on a nations goal there is a prefect size and composition? also what is your ideal form of state? I am interested to see different views
if you lived in the 13 Colonies at the eve of the American Revolution would you be a Patriot or a Royalist?
I would be loyal to the crown for sure. The crown wasn't that bad; the crown offers stability.
Fuck off Brit
Lemme tell you a story
Of a gay old Tory
Who posts poor questions to /his/
He knows only alliance
Without knowledge of defiance
For he gargles the limiest of jizz
You have now aware that founding fathers were land speculators and investors who were going to lose a lot of money when the king told the colonists not to settle any further inland.
When jewelry become a woman thing? All mens in the primitive tribes tried to look as fabulous as possible. What the fuck happened with men that they become boring one now.
>>1272011
It did?
Ever seen a wristwatch?
>>1272011
I really want to wear a nice loincloth and some fancy ass feathers... Also something between my nose also
>>1272011
In every culture there are unique ways for men to make themselves appear as presentable as possible. In our western culture that is now global culture our way of doing that is western-style clothes, nice shoes, watch etc.
In a way those things are our version of jewelry.
Tell me about WW1, /his/. I'm shamefully undereducated on the topic and the Wikipedia page is a cluaterfuck. Why did Franz Ferdinand's death actually matter so much?
Pic not related.
>>1272007
>Why did Franz Ferdinand's death actually matter so much?
Because Austria wanted it to.
>>1272014
This
Ofcourse, it's bad when the head of a state gets murdered, but Austria used it as an excuse to invade Serbia
Nationalism is what caused WW1. Archduke Ferdinand's assassination was just an excuse for everyone to go apeshit.
Basically the International Jewry fooled Europeans into killing each other through propaganda.
