>The queue on the opening day of the first McDonald's restaurant in Moscow, 1990.
>>1422796
Burgered.
Soft power sure is something isn't it?
>>1422796
Holy fuck, I just lost a lot of respect for Russians.
Then again, they were probably starving from being under gommunism for so long.
What are some good explicit rape paintings like pic related.
>>1422765
This is a serious thread. Please don't post that.
>>1422772
For u.
>>1422765
Sauce that shit famalam.
Can we talk about the 14th amendment?
Was it successfully ratified?
Is it legitimate?
??
Yes. Why wouldn't it be?
>>1422526
do you think this could be used to tell California to fuck off with their gun restrictions?
Was cao cao really a villain?
He was a grade A dickhead
Only to Shupporters
Was Lu Bu really a traitorous, disloyal cunt?
>but muh Zoroastrianism!!!
Does anyone really believe this fucking meme?
>>1422176
Wtf are you even talking about?
>>1422176
Cult of Aten, too.
Even Freud agrees.
Stay buttmad christard or chaim.
![13631655_10153759731998603_5193228249735168958_n[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nAGNMjx.jpg "13631655 10153759731998603 5193228249735168958 n[1]")
Which fallacy does the first reply exhibit? Fallacy of composition, fallacy of association, hasty generalization, some kind of confusion of sufficiency and necessity fallacy?..... "It did not happen to me, therefore it doesn't happen." what an asshole
You should be concentrating on the post by Trump, and the original post of this thread, which are textbook examples of the Faggot OP Fallacy.
>>1422077
Playing violent games may be a part of what creates the school shooting classics America knows and loves, but it's absurd to pin all the blame on them.
are you legitimately butthurt over somebody on twitter making fun of your hero? and why post it on /his/?
>Nothing is True
1 Thessalonians 5:21
Everything is Permitted
>Galatians 5:13, 17-18
>>1422010
Would you classify the first statement as true?
>>1422027
Nothing is True is supposed to contradict itself into getting you to test everything, even the statement itself, do be discerning of truth.
Taking it as a renouncing of objective truth is retarded and completely missing the point
>>1422027
Obviously not. Nothing is true, therefore, everything is permitted.
How will humanity deal with the looming energy hyper-crisis?
We won't.
>>1421925
how is this /his/ related
N U K E
U
K
E
Has there ever been a successful government that has been far left/progressive?
As only a casual reader of history, it seems to me all populist or "people's" movements all eventually implode because the ideology is inherently self-defeating. Am I missing something?
Also, I don't want to make this a modern "left vs right" debate, please. this isn't /pol/.
>>1421851
Define successful, far-left, and progressive.
There are plenty of very famous reformers that fit into the Whig historical narrative.
>>1421851
Bismarcks Germany
>>1421851
>far left/progressive
The problem is that today's definition of "left/progressive" is entirely different from that of history. A libertarian is often times considered to be right-wing today, yet libertarianism was extremely leftwing/progressive when it was founded during the Enlightenment. Therefore, this whole dichotomy is stupid and serves no purpose other than fooling the populace into picking left or right.
The United States and the French Republic both considered themselves to be leftist states. The US obviously strayed off course in the early 1900's, and France had a lot of ups and downs. Nevertheless, they both experienced periods of success and were considered to be leftist.
Why I don't consider the Armenian Genocide, a genocide.
> The Ottomans sided with the Germans, German defeat left the Ottomans in shambles.
> Allies conspired to use the nationalist tendencies within the Ottoman Empire to destroy it.
> Under Sevres, the Turkish people would have no nation, Anatolia would be colonized by Europe.
> Christian minorities of the Ottoman Empire, were encourage to rebel, and were given support to do so.
> Assertion that Armenians were unarmed is a joke.
> Armenians joined with the Russian forces, and grouped into guerrilla bands.
> They attacked the Turkish Army in the rear, even before the Russo-Armenian forces arrived, they succeeded in capturing Van, massacred its entire Muslim population, razed the entire city.
> They then proceeded to “soften up” the area, and in the process killed thousands of Turks and Kurds. There was a massive flow of refugees into Central Anatolia, who survived under extremely harsh conditions.
> The Army was being attacked by Russo-Armenian forces in the North and Armenian guerrillas in the South.
> Armenian communities who appeared uninvolved in the fighting, in fact were providing food, shelter and new recruits to the guerrillas.
> Ottomans decided to relocate the Armenian communities to Syria, Lebanon and Iraq
> Ottoman soldiers were ordered to escort the Armenians and protect them from any vigilantes.
> Most Armenian casualties occurred in regions where Ottoman control was the weakest. Many Turks and Muslims also died from the same causes, which was disease.
> The onset of the Russian Revolution forced the retreat of the Russo-Armenian forces to what is currently Armenia.
> During this retreat, many atrocities were committed against Turks and Kurds, including the burning of mosques full of women.
Thus, there was neither any planned execution of Armenians, nor such an intention. Even the Clinton Administration continues to back the Turkish people on this issue.
The roaches are mighty active today.
Any link about that van massacre?
All i find is Turks massacring Armeniansl.
What if Lincoln was never assassinated and went through with his plan of deporting former slaves? How would the history of America and the world unfold if the US was a completely white country after the civil war and there was never any civil rights movement?
>>1421419
>there was never any civil rights movement?
I hate this meme. The CRM wasn't just niggers. They weren't even the most vocal group, but they're cherry picked to shit by historians. There still would've been a CRM. It probably would have gone a lot smoother. Things probably would have been a lot better in the U.S. had Lincoln survived. Reconstruction certainly would have gone better, but I'm not going to make speculation about anything later than that.
>>1421419
>his plan of deporting former slaves
[citation needed]
What is OP was never born
Did the mutual choosing of time & place for battle actually exist, /his/, during the Ancient/Medieval ages or is it just a running meme?
Seems pretty stupid that party A would meet with party B and say "GREETINGS, FOEMAN, LET US AGREE TO MEET HERE ON THE MORROW. WE'LL BE ON A HILL. YOU GUYS GET THE FLAT GROUND."
"Ok."
Like, one party would hold the advantages while another wont and then they'd just agree on it.
>>1421376
I think it was more like army A marching to siege somewhere and then army B marches towards army A where then a battle happens.
>>1421393
See thats another Issue I have.
Wouldn't two armies just happening to stumble each other NOT have the time for battle lines and stuff like it?
>>1421397
Scouts were used for a reason.
![2000px-Six_Day_War_Territories.svg[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/HyFbPkr.png "2000px-Six Day War Territories.svg[1]")
How come half of the Sunni Arab world was unable to stop an army a fraction of its size hailing from a strip of land not much larger than New Jersey? Was this loss as completely humiliating as it seems, or was there a silver lining?
http://www.meforum.org/441/why-arabs-lose-wars
>>1421311
US dollaroos
>>1421311
I dunno, why was all of gaul unable to stop a few legions?
What's a good starting point for Logic?
>>1420954
Input, firstly internal input and secondly sensory input.
>>1420954
https://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1648/en_US/logic_pro_x_user_guide.pdf
phd in math
Why does anything exist?
It's all just a prank bro
Vibrations in the time/space continuum forming local order.
First ask "What is existence?" When you find out what it is, why it exist will be clear.
