Starting off with personal favorite. It takes a true genius to spend 1/3 of your GDP on your coronation. Just fuck my country up senpai.
>>456464
>tfw he wasn't even the worst leader the C.A.R. has had, never-mind contemporary Africa.
Anyone who thinks or calls himself "world leader" belongs in a nut house. Any public servant would love for you to think of him as a leader, because he's a voluntary slave, a servant with millions of masters. Sorry about your luck having to live in the feudal system, but you know old saying "when life gives you lemons move to Iceland"
>>456488
>Any public servant would love for you to think of him as a leader
Did a public servant steal your gf or something?
>be zouave in 1914
>go over the top
>bright red parachute pants get stuck in barbed wire
>bright red fez fails to deflect bullets
>die before I can surrender
who thought this was a good idea?
>>456362
probably some faggot, it usually is.
>>456362
Metal helmets don't deflect bullets. They retard shrapnel and thrown up rocks and dirt.
>not modifying this uniform and making it the new army dress uniform
Were Swiss mercenaries really all that? Wiki says they dominated the field of battle, but according to Rousseau they were so prone to desertion that they had to be banned from singing their traditional music, lest they get nostalgic for their homelands and run away.
more importanty - why the fuck he doesn't wear any shoes?
>>454057
Their prime had already passed during Rosseau times.
>>454065
Urs Graf was a mercenary and doodler
He liked to draw pictures of warriors and prostitutes. This is a German Landsknecht, the Swiss Pikemen's rival, being fucked up the ass by Satan.
>using 'Russia' and 'Soviet Union' interchangeably when referring specifically to the Soviet Union
>using 'England' and 'United Kingdom' interchangeably when referring specifically to the UK
>>447651
>>using 'Russia' and 'Soviet Union' interchangeably when referring specifically to the Putin's Russia
fixed that for you anon. Yes, I still hear people do this, and also
>czechoslovakia
>>how do you even know what that is, you were born in 1995!
>saying shit like "Soviet Hungary" and "Soviet Czechoslovakia"
Look at this beautiful norse architecture truly they were as sophisticated as they were brave when they fought heroic battles against monks and farmers I don't know how modern world would look like without massive contribution of the Norsemen.
It would be slightly less scandinavian across europe ;)
thats nigeria pal
>>461965
didn't know there grew that much spruces or pines in nigeria
>argues clearly
>gives no fucks
>blows Christianity the fuck out
>fucks French broads til he gets old
>tells jokes on his deathbed to disappointed believers
How can one man be so based?
Hume appreciation thread
>>463452
I wanna fuck his silly turban
>>463460
We all do, anon. We all do.
muh black swan
To deny the African origin of Grecian civilization the Eurocentrists attack Martin Bernal's book: Black Athena. This book has nothing to do with Afrocentrism. In the two volumes published thus far, Bernal maintains that Semites from Phoenicia and the Semitic Hyksos speaking rulers of Egypt, took civilization to Greece, not Black Africans.
J.A. Rogers in Sex and Race, Parker, Diop and DuBois on the other hand, are Afrocentric scholars. These scholars have reviewed the writings of the classical authors, the anthropological, linguistic and historical evidence to reach the conclusion that the ancient Greeks were blacks and that the European Greeks learned the liberal arts and sciences from their "black ancestors" who first settled Greece and the Egyptians.
According to the Olympian Creation Myth the earliest groups to appear on earth were the Libyco-Thracians .The Libyans were Proto-Saharans, as were the original Thracians. Some Thracians were descendants of the Kushite and Egyptian troops established at Trace, by Sesostris (Thutmose III or Ramses II), when he conquered Asia and Europe.(Diop 1991; Winters 1983a,1984b,1985a)
Many of the so-called Greek myths are in reality historical texts which show the ancient lifestyle of the pre-Aryans in Greece and the transition from Pelasgian matriarchy to Greek-Aryan patriarchy. The term Amazon was often used by the Aryans to denote matriarchal societies living on the Black Sea. The battle between Thesus and the Amazons, led by Queen Melanippe, records the conflicts between the ancient Aryan-Greeks and the Libyans settled around the Black Sea.
Dr. Lefkowitz (1992) and Snowden (1992,1976) perpetuate the myth that the only blacks in ancient Europe were slaves or mercenaries. This is false the Greek historical works make it clear that many ancient settlers of the Aegean came from Africa , especially the Garamantes and Pelasgians. G. W. Parker wrote that: "I need not go into details concerning the ethnical relations of the Romans, since they, too are Mediterranean and are closely related to the same African confederation of races ...[situated in Greece]. Aeneas, their mythical founder of Troy. The Aenead, like the Illiad, and Odyssey and all other of the world's great epics, is the poetic story dealing with African people". The heroes of these tales used long shields, the characteristic shields of the Indo-European speaking Greeks were round.
The Eurocentrists attempt to prove there was "considerable cultural and linguistic continuity from the twelfth century to the eight century BC" ,in the Aegean . Yet there is no way it can be proven that Indo-European Greeks have always been in Greece. This view on the continuity between the Linear B Greeks and later Greeks held by Lefkowitz is disputed by Hopper who noted that " after all, so much which characterizes Minoan Crete seems wholly alien to later Greece, despite the efforts of scholars to detect 'continuity' " .
Given the wealth of Afrocentric literature it would seem logical that the Eurocentric "resisters" review these works, and point out the weaknesses within these text to prove that Afrocen- trism is a "myth" (Lefkowitz 1992). But, instead of doing just this, the "resisters" simply mention text written by Afrocentric scholars and then attack Black Athena, as if Afrocentrism is based solely on this text.
r. Molefi Kete Asante has observed that: " The aim is to open [Afrocentric] fields of inquiry and to expand human dialogue around questions of social, economic, historical and cultural concern. Everything must be run through the sieve of doubt until one hits the bedrock of truth. Our methods, based on the idea of African centeredness, are meant to establish a clear pattern of discourse that may be followed by others". Based on this definition Black Athena, is not an Afrocentric work. This book is meant to imply that the Hyksos or Semitic speaking west Asians developed civilization in Greece not the blacks. This book because of its lack of African centeredness fails the test of an Afrocentric work..
Black Athena, is not the Afrocentric Bible on Black Egypt. We doubt that Cheikh Anta Diop would even agree with most of the thesis of this book. Trigger observed that:
"Although he [Bernal] has acquired an enthusiastic following among
exponents of negritude and occasionally describes some of the Egyptian
Pharaohs as "black" or "Nubian", he aligns himself not with Anta Diop but with more moderate "Negro intellectuals"...who...do see Egypt as essentially African" .
Bernal (1987,1991) believes that the Greeks resulted from a mixture of European and (Semitic speaking) Mediterranean people.
In volume 2 of Black Athena , Bernal outlines his thesis that the "Egyptians" founded Greek civilization. But these "Egyptians" are not blacks, they are Semitic speakers. Bernal (1991) makes it clear that he believes that the civilization of the Aegean was founded by Semitic speaking Phoenicians, and the Semitic speaking Hyksos Dynasty of Egypt.
Bernal (1991) sees Hyksos invaders as Hurrian, Semitic, Indo-Iranian speakers. As a result he believes that the Danaos and Kadmeans or Egyptian founders of Thebes in Greece, were the Hyksos. (Bernal 1991, p.495) In general, Bernal (1991) believes that when the Hyksos were driven from Egypt, they settled in the Aegean and developed civilization.
Bernal's view of the Hyksos as the founders of Grecian civilization has nothing to do with the work of Afrocentric scholars. The problem with Bernal (1991) is that he believes that the "Pre-Hellenes" or Pelasgian people were Indo-European speakers. This view is not held by Afrocentric scholars who recognize that the founders of Athens and Attica were blacks. Diop (1974,1991) and Clyde Ahmad Winters (1983b) make it clear that Blacks came to Greece in prehistoric times and remarried in Greece in significant numbers until classical times. Therefore the apparent errors in Bernal's Black Athena, should not be seen as proving that Afrocentric scholars are wrong. These errors only prove that Bernal (1991) has failed to prove that the Hyksos founded civilization in the Aegean.
Afrocentric scholars are accused of using old and outdated sources. This is true of some Afrocentric scholars who have written books based on secondary sources. Yet, those Afrocentric scholars such as DuBois, Diop (1974,1991), J.A. Rogers, Parker (1917,1918), Winters (1983b,1985b,1989a,1989b) use up-to-date sources to prove historical facts about the African past, even before Diop used primary sources to illuminate the African past. These Afrocentric ,scholars of African and African-American origin because of their unique character as a black people unaware of their specific original African home have not been blinded by ethnocentrism to look for the history of blacks in one part of Africa and the world. These scholars have sought to illuminate the African past throughout the world.
What was the connection between prohibition and first wave feminism? Are the people who describe it as a proto-SJW movement right?
>>461690
You seem to forget that prohibition by and large is also a product of Very Conservative Protestant elements in American society.
Who are quite the opposite of SJWness.
>>461690
Iirc prohibition was a big thing for Christians, not feminists. It's better to describe it as a proto war on drugs
prohibition! It's sooooo baddd guise EVERYBODY KNOWS U CANT KEEP DOWN FREEDOM
xDDD SJW gaymergate better PUA my redpill atheist rape van antifeminist alliance libertarian hispanic-american redditors
>tfw Mussolini
Nice try Bob Marley
>be Mussolini
>completely change how politics are done
>implement progressive social programs without chomping out like the communists
>distribute land, tax the rich
>win the respect of your countryman and the world
>slay mad puss and work out like crazy
>reform and improve the education system
>publish a life affirming Niezstchean political manifesto under your name to inspire the masses to greatness
>tfw your dweeby meth autistic fanboy outplays you and completely destroys your entire legacy as a statesman
>spend the last years of your life in self sacrifice in order to save your country from his autistic meth addled wrath
Truly a modern day hero. RIP sweet prince
>>461678
tom jones?
ITT we post and depict paintings related to history events.
>La Morte di Giulio Cesare dal pittore Vincenzo Camuccini
Why did the artist superimpose triangles all over that nice painting? Didn't he realize he was ruining the product of his hard work?
pic related, one of my favorite paintings ever.
Can you post a version of that Camuccini without the overlay?
>>461624
It's post-modern, you pleb
Wow, no thread?
Ok. Let's celebrate the anniversary of Washington crossing the Delaware, killing a few Kraurs, capturing a fuckton, and pulling off one hell of a surprise attack.
Also, pre-celebration for Trenton and Princeton victories.
FRENCH NOT ALLOWED.
>>461285
Ah fuck. Krauts. Goddamn you apple.
New Jersey is a shitty state. When did it become so?
>FRENCH NOT ALLOWED
Enjoy your staying Britain's bitch forever.
>He
>Son
>Father
Why does the Bible anthropomorphize God so often?
God speaks, Gen. 1:3; converses, Lev. 4:1; calls, Lev. 1:1; he hears, Ex. 16:12; sees, Gen. 1:4; smells, 1 Sam 26:19; laughs, Ps. 2:4; and hisses, Isa. 7:18. He has eyes, Amos 9:4, which he sets on sinners; hands, with which he grasps them, Amos 9:2; a hand, that is against the prophets that see vanity, Ezek. 13:9; fingers, with which he writes the tables of the Law, Deut. 9:10; an arm, which he stretches out with might, Jer. 27:5, and which he lays bare before all nations to seperate them, Isa. 52:10; ears, Num. 11:18, 14:28, Ezek. 8:18, 2 Kings 19:28; feet, under which he whirls the clouds like dust, Nah. 1:3, and for which there is even a footstool, Isa. 66:1; a mouth, with which he instructs the peoples, Jer. 9:12; lips that are full of indignation and a tongue that is a devouring fire, Isa. 30:27; a head, that has a defense, Ps. 60:7; a face which he maketh to shine upon his saints, Num. 6:25, and which he hides to the terror of the creature, Ps. 104:29; and a back which Moses was permitted to see, Ex. 33:23. His heart turns within him and his emotions are kindled, Hos. 11:8
Because at the time all gods literally walked around and literally had houses and all that.
T. Canaanites and other mesopotamians
In the old tradition, god and other deities were men that died. Hence zeus who had a tomb in greece, for example. Don't forget that funerary practises existed long before religions.
Have you realised Zizek gives new talks at the drop of a hat? How is it that one guy can glide by solely based on extreme levels of charisma? How do I become like him?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXB7osLEb10
>appeal to retard leftist students
>spout absolute nonsense that paints them/blacks/women as the victim of some kind of structural oppression
>???
>profit
>>458414
>How is it that one guy can glide by solely based on extreme levels of charisma?
Because he has a cult of personality. He's more performance artist than academic at this point.
>>458414
>be on cia payroll
Is perversion bad?
If so, why?
If not, why?
What would you consider perversions?
What is acceptable in terms of sex?
depends on the time and the place.
Perversion is subjective.
>durrr doesn't this JPEG make you feel uncomfortable?
That's my point. Feels. Feeling. Ally McFeel. "Perversion" is a personal expression of disgust upon exposure to a stimulus in a sexual context.
>>455981
Bad for what or whom?
For God? For me? For you? For an organisation? For some group?
If someone tried to revive the Roman Empire in a post-apocalyptic setting, what would it look like?
>>452916
how am i supposed to answer that question
a post-apocalyptic setting could be literally anything, just like a post-ice-age setting can be literally anything. I'm struggling to see anything that could be reasonably asserted about this scenario. A revival of the Roman Empire might look somewhat similar to the Roman Empire i suppose.
Is that the answer you were looking for? That it might look a bit like the Roman Empire? It would probably be more futuristic though, unless it wasn't
Take your Warhammer thread to /tg/
Play New Vegas
