Who was the best commander in WW2?
Unironically, Hitler
Manstein & Guderian
>>1384501
General Winter
I don't really get this whole eternal Anglo thing. Why would Germanics poke fun at Anglos, the Germanic inhabitants of Britain? Why not eternal Celt?
Germanics are the ones that ruin everything.
>not realizing that Britain was one of the first things ruined by the English
If Vortigern had lopped off Hengist and Horsa's heads the moment they stepped their Germanic asses off of their boats the world would be a much better place.
>>1381650
You're expecting too much from retarded /pol/sters
what went wrong, /his/?
>inb4 socialism
It literally was a combination of socialism and the fact that they relied heavily on oil
/thread
>>1377318
>Suffered from extreme capital flight
>Rely on oil to prop up economy
>Tried to solve the capital flight with hairbrained currency swap scheme
>Currency swap scheme creates a bubble
>Bubble bursts when oil prices fall
Contrary to popular belief, it took more than "feeding poor people" to ruin Venezuela's economy. Shit was falling apart at the seams for decades.
>>1377318
Chavez killed manufacturing and made the economy rely exclusively on oil. When oil prices went dowm,Maduro was forced to print money to keep the clienteralist structure,creating tons of inflation. So pretty much socialism
Is this even remotely true?
It isn't.
>>1387352
Evolution does not necessitate atheism. It just describes how biology on earth changed and makes no reference to the existence of God.
Atheism does not necessitate humanism because humanism is a narrow set of ideals extolling humanity when others, like nihilism, would have equal worth.
The use of "Socialism" as a negative universally is retarded, because unless you're an-cap, you believe in some of socialism. However, if this means excessively socialist economies, then no, it doesn't necessitate from humanism, which does not make judgements on the intricacies of economies.
"Socialism" does not lead to Communism, in fact, it's usually the opposite. Communism came to power in feudal states which hated Socialism, while Western states used Socialist methods to stop Communists from being popular, particularly Britain.
I wonder if whoever made this has ever heard of Objectivists.
No. Not a single one of those steps is necessarily true. It could be true, but nothing guarantees that evolution will lead to anything, much less a (loss of a) religious or ideological position
What do women really want?
>>1383225
Power
>>1383225
You, OP. You are the sublime object of ideology.
a sound dicking
What's the closest we ever had to a female Hitler ?
the planned parenthood women who help poor racial minority women get abortions and finance abortions in poor foreign countries.
>>1387797
I'm talking specific historical figure here
>>1387800
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger
She was a historical figure.
Did the Cuban revolutionaries know that building socialism would kill Cuba's tourist economy and turn them into a pariah among Latin American countries?
Did they care?
>>1390920
No they probably didn't understand that. Either way most of them were probably fucked in the end.
>>1390920
>Revolutionary socialists
>Understanding anything
Nice meme
>>1390920
Cuban revolutionaries turned to socialism because they pissed off the big US of A, so they needed a big new friend, the soviets.
In the beginning Castro wasn't a communist.
Did the Romans lay the path for the British to become so powerful?
>Brits
>powerful
lol
>>1390617
They only conquered most of the new world you butthurt fag.
>>1390627
>latin america
>most of
ok
How come random desert people thousands of years ago used to get concrete proof God exists but we're just supposed to go on faith?
It's about fucking time for another miracle I'd say. Why doesn't He schedule one every 100 years or so?
>>1390340
>Why doesn't He schedule one every 100 years or so
There was a big one 99 years ago.
>>1390343
>some solar effects and Portuplebs overreacting
>"""miracle"""
>>1390340
Do you really think this only happens every X100 years? Or X1000?
What the fuck was his problem?
>>1390262
He looks like the bad guy from a Disney movie.
>>1390336
He was a Disney villain IRL for all intents and purposes.
He just wanted to make his own jolly empire
What would a pre-Napoleonic Germany look like?
That's just a load of fucking spooky bullshit kiddo.
Delete this thread and consider yourself, BTFOD.
>>1390163
Wat
>>1390160
Pre-Napoleonic Germany looks like a bunch of kingdoms fighting one another. Then Napoleon came along and they came together to try and fail to fight back.
>Martin Luther did not err on justification
What did he mean by this?
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/full-text-pope-francis-inflight-press-conference-from-armenia-45222/
>>1390139
>"I think that the intentions of Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were not correct."
>"in that time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate. There was corruption in the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power...and this he protested."
He's talking about corruption m8. No one deny this. The Church was turbo corrupted at that time and needed a reform.
>>1390378
>The Church was turbo corrupted
>was
Top kek
>>1390378
>Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err. He made a medicine for the Church, but then this medicine consolidated into a state of things, into a state of a discipline, into a way of believing, into a way of doing, into a liturgical way and he wasn’t alone; there was Zwingli, there was Calvin, each one of them different, and behind them were who? Principals!
Did Rome have something like an independent press? Who was responsible for writing & distributing important news?
That fat faggot who yells at Forum
>>1390051
This, paper was rare and used only sparingly, information was mostly passed via word of mouth
>>1390051
TRUE ROMAN BREAD
>no proof there is no God
>no proof Jesus didn't rise from the dead
>but then atheists turn around and apply empiricism to nonempirical questions
>claim that only empiricism matters, as if that in itself isn't a nonempirical statement
>being this intellectually lazy
>>1390024
*tips fedora*
>>1390024
>>no proof Jesus didn't rise from the dead
Even if he did, so what? Lazarus rose from the dead, Osiris rose from the dead, Castor and Pollux rose from the dead, granted it's a pretty amazing achievement but it doesn't mean you're the Creator of teh Universe.
>>1390024
These threads are just Atheists baiting other Atheists along with Christians.
Was the USSR going to invade honshu or no
>>1390018
Considering that the Japanese lost their navy at that point, they could do it with civilian transports and just suck up the losses Red Army style.
>>1390018
Yes, Stalin dow'd specifically to grab as much of Japan for the ComIntern as he could and the USSR was in the process of building up an invasion force when the US dropped the bombs.
Hokkaido maybe
I don't see how Honshu was going to work out they would need years to prepare.
![george-patton[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/bGyD2f4.jpg "george-patton[1]")
![277px-Lope_de_Aguirre_2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/DBleBHG.jpg "277px-Lope de Aguirre 2[1]")
