Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 207. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
"I have made only one mistake in my life, I should have burned Berlin!"
What did he mean by this?
>>1300763
He foresaw the future he had caused and how it would all lead up to the death of ten million Jews in the holocaust. He realized too late that if he razed Berlin when he had the chance, the shoah might have been prevented.
>>1300763
>Fucking Napoleon
>claims only one regret
Fuck off you Corsican shit.
>>1300763
Maybe he was talking about those donuts.
>mfw both J*sus and M*hammad were killed by based Jews
Mess with the best, die like the rest
>>1300760
Delete this please my Jewish friend
>>1300760
>implying Romans were Jewish
>>1300760
how can jews be based if they don't have a home? checkmate kikes
>hear stories about rivers turning red with humans' blood
>yeah whatever
>read about the sacking of baghdad in 1258
>tigris turns blackish blue from the ink of books being thrown in
>libraries burned to the ground
>i feel my spine clench up
>mfw all those books lost forever
MONGOL SCUM
>liberal arts students care more about books than human lives
>mfw they complain STEMfags are heartless
>>1300502
>humans' blood
>spine clench up
Are you a book?
600 hundred years before that the Muslims dumped the Sassanid library of Ctesiphon into the Euphrates.
What goes around comes around.
"Better for a hundred men to hold a hundred different incorrect opinions than for them all to hold the same correct opinion"
So, war because of false beliefs is better than enlightened peace?
>100 men are not allowed to agree with each other
What did he mean by this?
>>1300476
Welcome to democracy where every opinion matters the same.
>B-but you cannot know that your opinion is the right one
What is science?
What is so bad about tabula rasa?
It's wrong.
it can't be true because the homosex play with dollies
>bad
Did you choose this word deliberately to shitpost?
Let's settle this once and for all.
http://www.strawpoll.me/10511727
>>1300333
Could you please remake this poll but choosing cities instead of countries?
I don't feel comfortable answering it as it is.
Many thanks
>>1300379
do it yourself mane
>no "Rome is dead" option
Garbage poll
Is it just me or is the ad hominem fallacy deeply rooted in tabula rasa belief?
>>1300302
Yeah it's just you
>>1300302
Whether the person is an idiot or not from birth doesn't mean that countering an argument with an ad hominem attack is appropriate or productive.
>>1300314
Well, if I argue that you wouldn't know any better because you're a part of ethnicity X, doesn't that hold consistent with the idea of nature over nurture?
We describe historical figures in unflattering terms
>sperg obsessed with the crusades finally got his wish
>autistic who wanted to save Germany and his Aryan race but ended up an heroing like a pussy as every pretty white girl was gang raped by the Soviets.
>unemployed NEET who lived off his rich friend and did nothing but write about how people more successful then him are evil
>Pencil dicked slav with little man syndrome (5'3!), tries to scare western Chads, continuously fucks up and instead turns to crops
![1064px-Industrial_Workers_of_the_World_(union_label).svg[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/ufIrfg9.png "1064px-Industrial_Workers_of_the_World_(union_label).svg[1].png")
What the fuck was their problem?
robber barons
>>1300269
Capitalist pigs obviously. You couldn't do a little research to figure that one out?
>>1300269
Fucking LARPers
Would it have been better if the central powers had won WW1?
Pretty sure there would be a second world war either way. You'd just have France all pissed off instead of Germany, and the Balkans would be no more stable than they were before, just even angrier, if anything.
Probably as we wouldn't be dealing with half the shit we are today
No.
What developments in politics would surprise, or hell disturb, disturb Plato/Aristotle?
The universal adoption of democracy among the west
if plato and aristotle were alive today, they would be surprised at the fact that the modern world has become secular and religious fundamentalism does not dictate the laws anymore. The execution of Socrates seems now but a farcry for democracy in the modern world has allowed for freedom of speech on religious matters. growing further apart?
idk lol
What is the official Christian position on psychedelic drugs? Are there any taboos against it in the Bible?
>>1300155
Philip k dick was mesmerized by her breasts first off. Second useing drugs for religion goes back to the Fucking witch doctor days so it's a joke and not Christian
>>1300155
As you treat the least of these, you treat the Lord. Sometimes you see self as lesser or least and don't consider to preserve your own health in a venture toward self-destruction. In this manner you are causing harm to self, harm to God's creation and harm to God. You really shouldn't do it, but we mess up in all manners of ways, so you probably will do it anyway. Once given the opportunity of forethought , however , a smart person who cares for self wouldn't do it, anyway. So it just becomes an...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1300155
I don't think there's any specific verse in the bible that says don't do drugs, it mentions that drunkards won't go to heaven so it's fair to assume drug addicts would fall under that category.
![a0430112173_16[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/JILj6XC.jpg "a0430112173_16[1].jpg")
I have some unusual world views. I would like to be able to call myself a member of some school of thought but I don't know where I fit. I would like to read some philosophy but I just don't know what I would enjoy, or what/who would tell me something I haven't already thought about.
>tl;dr
If I have 0% belief in religion, am skeptical of everything, and despise the way my own generation acts, (y, 1993) what might I enjoy reading?
>>1300113
kafka
"How to kill yourself" sounds like a good fit for you.
>>1300113
>am skeptical of everything
Try solipsism then, fag.
U CANNOT KNOW
Could some kind patrician translate the following statements into Latin. Just tell me to fuck off back to >>>/wsr/ if this is unwanted content.
>Pain is pleasure.
>Conflict is pleasure.
>Epicureans are dirty, lazy, and inferior people.
>>1300014
Panum es inflictum.
Conflictus es pleasuribum.
Epicureanae es iulvani, retardae et inferiore vulgus.
>>1300023
kys
>>1300023
Wew... Can someone confirm this as accurate?
Why are Mormons still defending this guy? Why are Mormons so ridiculous?
Christians still defend Paul.
>>1299295
What was so bad about him?
>>1299366
More evidence /pol/ is always right.
