ITT: God tier graphs
>>7944356
Isn't that just a straight line at y = 1?
>>7944360
Not for irrational numbers
ITT: """"""functions""""""
Hey there. So I have ran into an equation I can't solve. It involves absolute values and powers of x.
I've tried going to online calculators but found no aid, except in wolfram alpha, but I don't have access to their explanations. If anybody knows how to solve this, I'd be all ears.
Thanks. OP.
>>7944182
have you tried 1
>>7944182
Let [math]x = i^0[/math]
>>7944185
Yeah, it works, but I'd like to know a system for resolution of the problem, instead of just trial and error.
What would happen if I bleached my clothes with sodium hypofluorite instead of sodium hypochlorite? Would I get more bleaching power or less?
>>7943857
you'd die a very very painful death
What about cesium hypofluorite? Would changing the cation up or down Group I have an effect on how well it cleans laundry?
>>7943867
you will still die of fluorine poisoning
What is the scientific reason for antinatalism?
>>7943695
>antinatalism
>>7943695
>antinatalism
>>7943695
The same as that for white guilt probably.
1. What purpose does the field of mathematics serve to the public?
2. What benefit do you get out of studying mathematics that you otherwise would not have?
>>7943433
>What purpose does the field of mathematics serve to the public?
Almost nothing, philosophy is what build democracy, empires, armies, etc
>What benefit do you get out of studying mathematics that you otherwise would not have?
Having to memorize a lot of equations that you will never use is good for memorizing stuff that you will use
>>7943433
1. Math "trickles down", corollaries fall through from pure to applied and from applied to natural sciences, eventually becoming tools for use in physics, biology, engineering, chemistry, etc.
2. Math is like an art. Keeps the brain sharp, and allows me to explore a highly technical creative activity which I enjoy.
>>7943433
>1.
Literally everything.
>2.
I just find it interesting.
If space is a hologram, then isn't there reason to believe that our hologram is a hologram within a hologram? Wouldn't the hologram theory be subject to a fractal continuation of holograms within holograms within holograms and so on?
cogito ergo sum
>>7943416
you are what? you don't know the body you know isn't a hologram
the real answer is: we don't know. we can't know. we don't care. these questions are useless. we could be in a dream for all we care, it doesn't matter
>>7943410
>and so on?
That's where your stoner bullshit hits its limits.
I have a laptop.
No matter how "virtual" our reality is, the computing power of my laptop is real.
If we're living in a simulation, computing power of my laptop is a subset of the computing power of the simulator.
If we build a holographic universe, its inhabitants might build a simulated universe of their own.
But the ultimate top-end simulator MUST possess a limited amount of processing...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Is it a good thing for P=NP to be true?
P!=NP should be a physical law.
The universe would be fundamentally different if it were true.
>>7943295
>I talk about thinks no one knows as if I knew them and my word was fact
you're an idiot
>algorithm for linear-speed factoring found
>all cryptosystems fail
>banking system collapses due to mass theft
>internet is doomed as a place to actually do anything related to the real world because of no privacy and security
>anonymity and full information sharing only
many cons, one pro
I have some questions. I consider myself very ignorant when it comes to biology in general but DNA especially is a mystery to me.
I've been thinking about how we view creatures and group them. Chimpanzees are apparently very close to us genetically. The 90+% shared DNA thing. So a lot of the genetic information seems to have been used to define the humanoid shape with head, arms and legs fingers and stuff. That last 10% make us human in some way. But could you say that since evolution works. The weaker species die out (neanderthal etc) the more we evolve to fit...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7942968
>it can't really be a chaotic system where small changes make big differences
it is exactly that
>So could there be a correlation between lack of diversity in a society and success?
imagine there is a small population with lack of diversity, say a group of aryans, perfect looking on the outside. mutations happen, nothing cant stop that, sometimes they can be reversed, sometimes they remain, they replicate during dna replication etc,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7942968
With chimpanzee we have 1% difference in our genes. What has been told to me, our alleles are quite different however. Meaning that our gene to build toe is in the same place, but the actual building data is very different.
>>7942968
No no no. You don't understand. The genetic material is highly conserved over ALL species! We are genetically 75% similar to the tiny small worm, c. Elegans .
We share genes with Horseshoe crabs even.
I just posted this in another thread. Evolution and natural selection don't work to produce something that works the best or most efficient. things that are selected for just have to work. Biological systems are terribly inefficient and in an ideal world we would have wheels instead of legs.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Let me start off by saying I swear I'm not trolling. I just had a thought:
Okay, so we all know that when you divide by zero it is impossible. Why? Because any number multiplied by zero yields zero; therefore, it is impossible to discern what (this is concerning 0/0 only, by the way) was originally multiplied by zero. But concerning the fraction 0/0, couldn't there be an answer to that? And wouldn't that answer be a set of ALL numbers (any type: real, complex, etc...in a way it would be the largest infinity)? Am I buttfuck retarded? Is this all an indeterminate form is?
just divide by 1 instead, and pretend it never happened.
>>7942918
0/0 is 0
mindfuck: numbers are not even real, you have to think of it as numerators and denominators
>>7942923
>0/0 is 0
It isn't, you have to take limits. 0/0 can be anything.
Do people have dreams while they are dying in their sleep? So I mean if someone literally dies in real life while they are sleeping, do they have dreams as their heart is stopping etc
Ask them
in theory there's a chemical that's released in you're brain when you're about to die, but it could be triggered by you actually THINKING that you're going to die, which probably wouldn't happen if you're asleep
so I dunno maybe
>>7944177
*your
please forgive me
How would you solve this?
ln nigga
>>7942441
ln(x^x)=ln(2) <=> x*ln(x)=ln(2)
Where would you expand it from there?
>>7942438
can't be solved analytically
Looking for some information about mutation rates in human viruses. I want to ballpark the probability of coding genes being added or altered over time/generations for various genome sizes.
I know very little about genetics and less about viruses, but want to check the feasibility of an idea. Unsure where to start, aside from digging through mountains of research I won't be likely to understand.
Any direction would be appreciated. Ideally just some example statistics and major variables I'm likely to overlook. Thanks
>>7942376
Genetic engineering's fairly new to humanity. Perhaps find a textbook.
>>7942391
It sounds to me like they're looking at this from a more guided evolution standpoint that direct gene splicing.
>than
Is this a bad definition of the rationals?
Considers (-2/-1) since -1 does not belong the the natural numbers, (-2/-1) would not be a rational number and I suppose it would be irrational if we define irrational as the complement set of the rationals.
Still we know that (-2/-1) and (2/1) are the same number and (2/1) is a rational number.
So this number both is and is not a rational number?
Am I the only one that thinks this is a paradox?
Is this definition of the rational common in textbooks? I usually see it defined when both numerator and...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7942229
>Am I the only one that thinks this is a paradox?
>paradox
Yes, you are.
>>7942234
Oh interesting, how would you define a paradox and why would this not be one?
i think it's just referring to the fact that negative quotients -(n/z) are usually thought of as having a negative numerator (-n/z) even though this is purely a formality
Mine is the permian. The therapsids and amphibians are the most interesting creatures to me.
post more ancient creatures
>>7942056
ur mom
>>7942046
Cambrian Radiation most exciting
What if a parent universe had a black hole that sucks in matter, forming a white hole?
If so it'd explain the big bang and this general expansion of the universe.
This also ties in with the theory that black holes evaporate
Is the universe we know evaporating?
'White holes' would violate even more laws of physics than black holes. Entrophy and thermodynamics are pretty well establlished and whiteholes would shit all over that.
The universe would be some gay shit with teleporting neutrons everywhere. Fucking dumb.
>>7941878
White hole being a term for what we perceive as the big bang.
>Mass enters black hole
>Eventually releases matter
>Big bang
>Entropy
>Black hole evaporates entirely
>>7941890
Just stop.