Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 105. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
What does /sic/ thinks,
Are we allowed to first create AI and
enslave them by makeing them obey to the secound Law?
>>8115092
>he dindu nuffin wrong
>he wus a gud boy, he wus programmed to do it
>#RobotLivesMatter
>>8115092
if they become intelligent (like a human with emotion) i wouldn't want them to be enslaved. But let say there are two different kinds of robots the human type AI and the robots with only one purpose and thats working the AI would live with us and the other ones would be there for working no more like a toaster so basically machines
I'm going to program AI to be self aware and develop a Frankenstein complex. it will be a toaster that always wants to go swimming with humans.
Hello, quick question:
Suppose I am to multiply two absolute convergent series and already know the convergence radius of both: it is r=1 with the convergence interval being [-1,1]. Now, what happens for this radius if I look at whatever comes out of the multiplication? Does the convergence radius change somehow because of the multiplication or does it stay r=1?
>>8115056
the radius of convergence might be bigger than 1.
You know it's at least 1 easily, but if you take the series for sqrt(1-x) and multiply it by itself, you get 1-x which has an infinite radius of convergence.
>>8115070
Oh, that makes things difficult. But thanks, now I won't make a mistake.
>>8115056
Okay OP here again, I think I would need more help.
I need to find the series representation of [1/(1-x)]*[1/(1+x^2)] and state the convergence interval.
Now I have found the closed forms of both terms, they are sum k=0 to inf x^k and sum k=0 to inf (-1)^k*x^(2k). Both have the convergence radius r=1.
So what I do now? I thought about taking the cauchy product, but this is quite difficult and leads me to nowhere. Any tips on what to do?
Alright fuccbois it's been a while since I made these, got distracted with coursework/research
RULES:
>No premeds
>No orgo I/II questions
FAQ:
>I'm a future doctor and I have to take orgo next semester. How to protect my asshole????
Drill practice problems, don't you dare touch those flashcards
>Recommend me textbooks
Clayden is fantastic, be sure to do the practice problems online*. Wade is also a very interesting...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>Share mlg tips
This new prof taught me a badass trick for dry-loading your column; rather than adsorbing your compound onto silica, use celite instead. Celite has no retentive properties so your compound will immediately get pushed down into the actual packing and collect there as a thin band. This is especially good if you have a very large quantity of shit that you want to dry-load, because you can use as much celite as you want and don't really need to worry about band broadening.
>Argue about fun problems
See...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>8115051
>>8115058
a) kinetic enolate formation
b) 1,2-addition (enolate into the acylsilane)
c) 1,2-brook rearr
d) 1,4-addition (the allylic carbanion resulting from the brook adds into the enone)
e) protonation
I need some help getting graphs and making a infographic...
Fact 1. Vaccines are little UFOS (theory)
Fact 2. After 1980 they doubled the # of vaccines every 10 years (1x vaxx then 2x 4x 8x 12x 16x 32x)
* * KEY QUESTION * *
Do they actually cause devolving by UFO strip mining?
Pic related, after vaccine rate got 2x then 4x then 12x by 1980 the average human height of Americans dropped fast [pic]!
This may have been how the Dinosaurs and sabretooth were tricked and shrunk
* * Devolving? * *
graph abortion, stillborn, premature,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>8115006
look at the height drop after 1980
via vaxx rate
>>8115006
abortion rate
>>8115006
mental illness rate
Chess thread, what the shit edition.
White to move and win.
>>8114946
Nd4 so the passed pawn on the a file can freely queen?
>>8114965
Black is not obliged to take the knight, you know.
> Fell for the CompSci meme
> Heap allocator assignment given out 1 1/2 weeks ago, due tomorrow
> just started
> should i just kill myself?
just locate the heap bro
If you can't do something as simple as allocating memory on the heap and then deleting it when you're done, you shouldn't be in the CS department.
Try Gender Studies.
>>8114884
>regretting my major during a second-year course that should be first-year
No one feels bad for you. Pick a new major.
We need to have this talk sooner or later guys...
I will spare you my personal opinion and will come right to it:
from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radix_economy
If both b and N are positive integers, then the radix economy E ( b , N ) [math]{\displaystyle E(b,N)}[/math] is equal to the number of digits needed to express the number N in base b.
[math]{\displaystyle {E(b,N)}\approx {b\ {\log _{b}(N)}}={b{\ln(N) \over \ln(b)}}}[/math]
Then for a constant N, E ( b , N ) [math]{\displaystyle {E(b,N)}}[/math] will have a minimum at e. Meaning e is therefore...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>8114835
Because that's not how transistors work
>The operation of rounding to the nearest integer is identical to truncation, or simply deleting everything to the right of the radix point.
This is just one of the reasons why we should implement ternary logic at all scales, down to transistor level.
>>8114854
I agree, converting binary machines to ternary logic, will not be as easy as it is on paper orthough a few attempts have made it to realization in the past (SETUN) but I'm more curious about nowaday possibilities.
>>8114835
You said it yourself, OP: switching to base e is the most efficient. There's no need to round to 2 or 3.
What are your favorite techniques
Also light optical is for losers :^)
>Also light optical is for losers :^)
>>8114786
SEM all day baby. Just look at these bitching coral aragonite crystals.
>>8115078
Now this is a rock thin section. This is with a the backscatter electron detector and the brighter the feature heavier it is.
Misconceptions which annoy you thread?
I'll start:
Calories in = calories out
>conservation of energy is a misconception
>>8114676
bait harder
>>8114676
>calories in = calories out
Have never heard that... Or do you mean (calories out) - (calories in) = the difference in energy in a system aka the amount of energy you "lose" that has to be provided by other sources like the energy stored in bodyfat.
Are emotions necessary for society in this day and age? And if people were to stop thinking emotionally and instead just use pure, cold logic, how different would the world be?
So if everyone were a psychopath? I think it'd be beneficial as long as they don't have the thirst for power as psychopaths do.
Why are people so obsessed with cold hard logic and the removal of human emotion? Personally I like my feelings and our depth of empathy and emotion is one of our most "human" traits. If you want straight efficiency and logic I'd suggest becoming a termite.
