How the fuck does "Common Core" work? What is this fuckery?
consider the following:
solve 15 - 11.
1) 11 + 1 = 12
2) 12 + 1 = 13
3) 13 + 1 = 14
4) 14 + 1 = 15, which is exactly what we wanted
adding up 4 of the 1's we get 4, hence 15 - 11 = 4.
Q(uickly).E(ject).D(ick).
>>7641586
So that's what that fucking lecturer was doing. Some intro maths lecturer at my Uni was trying to show something like that and everyone was confused as fuck. Didn't help that the guy was ESL.
Seems slow and pointless.
>>7641565
Common core is written mental math for retarded people that can't into mental math by themselves ( and generally it just ends up confusing them just as much if not more, as their retardation is genetic and not due to a flawed teaching method ).
What's the evolutionary purpose of baldness?
why did human body decide to just let the top of your hair disappear?
>>7641523
There isn't, bald people just still kept getting laid (likely before they started balding)
It shows how beta you are. Women find it disgusting and you end up killing yourself. Better hair genes gets more pussy.
>>7641531
why aren't you an astronaut yet
>baaah it's too hard
these are the requirements on the official website
Applications doesn't mean they will send you to pluto right away. If you had even a tiny bit of surgery that can cause a health risk, or any condition that can even remotely cause you to risk the health or lives of the crew members, they will disqualify you immediately.
>>7641502
I'm not an american
>>7641502
I actually don't want to be an astronaut and don't even know why people would want to be one. I might fail to see the appeal. Or it's just an american meme that survived the "end" of the cold war.
Ivan Zelich, 17 years old boy, has done something groundbreaking and his discovery is going to change the world drastically. This kid is the real deal, not Jacob Meme.
What are your achievements math guys? Shitposting on /sci/?
Here's the article
>daily mail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3304659/Schoolboy-genius-17-develops-maths-theory-calculates-problems-faster-COMPUTER-idea-did-it.html
>What are your achievements math guys?
I made it out of the hood, nigga
>Jacob meme
Lol. Butthurt you'll never have an IQ that high, OP? Its alright, maybe people smarter than you will discover a way to cope with living as a dummy :)
The first person to accurately decode this 17 digit cipher will get a $50 Steam Gift Card.
I just want to see if you can do it.
Good Luck Anons.
just type out the cipher if this isnt a ruse fambioni
we cant read your shit handwriting
>>7641356
you mafia or something? too risky my nigga
>>7641360
Here you go anon. Some of them are decimals.
Good luck
1/3
What Chemtrails are, and why they're real
Coming to Face the Facts
I, like any denizen of the internet, have come across the cornucopia of crazy conspiracy theories, from the plausible to the ridiculous, to the type that are so nonsensical that one can’t be sure they’re not a parody of the ridiculous. One of these, which I’d classified as the second category (clearly ridiculous, but obviously not a parody as people seriously believe it), was that of chemtrails. In short, “They” are spraying chemicals from commercial airliners (which typically...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
2/3
Chemtrail Composition
Chemtrails are, as the name suggests, trails of chemicals, in this case specifically those left by high-altitude aircraft. Some chemtrails may linger for hours, while others seem to vanish within minutes. However, even those that visually disappear to not actually disappear; it’s just that the majority of chemicals released are colorless and odorless, but no less dangerous.
The primary component of chemtrails is hydric acid, which, like the other ingredients I’ll talk about, has the worrying ability to dissolve completely in...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
3/3
Why Chemtrails?
Here, I can only enter the realm of speculation, based on the aforementioned three deadly ingredients of this toxic soup. Because carbonic anhydride and carbonyl are both deadly, with the former being heavier than air (and thus tends to sink to the ground), one possibility could be a mass extermination campaign. However, the primary ingredient seems to imply ulterior motives.
My theory is that chemtrails are a form of chemical geoengineering. After September 11, 2001, when all air traffic across the US was grounded, studies showed that...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
have people been dying in significant numbers of anomalous poisoning from toxic chemicals, such as those mentioned?
No?
In terms of how the commands work and what they do
Pic unrelated
Dunno, hardest I've used is R t
Assuming complicated, but not unnecessarily complicated, I would go with assembly language. Otherwise, I would go with Arnould-C.
what the hell does hard mean in this context? tedious? then probably x86 or one of those gimmick languages like chef
Is getting a programmable robotic arm worth it? I figure it would be a good hobby. I have a strong background in hydraulics/electronics, so would the programming part be hard to pick up?
>also general robot thread
self bump
They come in kits these days, pretty easy from any angle you come at it.
>>7641110
do you have one?
Does evolution mean me and brad pit are cousins?
yeah, and that tree next to your house if you go back far enough.
>>7641099
He look like real good looking monkey in this photo. must because of it's nasty long beard and hair.
>>7641099
yes
so i was being a smartass the other day, and told my friend who vapes that even though its called "smoking", you never actually want to burn what you're trying to smoke, even cigarettes, marijuana, etc. he doesn't believe me at all, so i figured you guys could settle this.
my reasoning is that burning (ie combustion) will destroy nicotine/THC/cocaine/meth/opium or whatever youre trying to smoke, chemically, and that smoking a cigarette actually works by burning a small amount of material and paper in order to get the solid phase nicotine right next...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7641098
>my reasoning is that burning (ie combustion) will destroy nicotine/THC/cocaine/meth/opium
That's wrong
>>7641098
I had an argument over on 420chan a few years back with some idiot who thought that candle's don't burn, but rather, they vapourize
You're the first one in a few years to rival his stupidity
Fact or fiction?
>>7641002
You can keep an object moving straight forever in a 0G vacuum due to inertia
Impossible.
>>7641014
That's not infinite energy though. If the system doesn't have continuous net output it's not a "perpetual motion machine."
>TFW you know your product is p-methylbenzaldehyde but you can't justify your answer with c13 NMR analysis
>>7640943
Then you don't know your product is p-methylsmhtbhfam
I'm going to kill myself if the EM drive isn't real.
>>7640898
I don't see why they can't whip one up and strap it to a satellite or some kind of fairly simple probe and give it a test run
Like keep testing it sure, but multiple of these things have been made (since multiple places are testing them) so surely it would be worthwhile to actually field-test one and see if it holds up outside of a laboratory setting.
>being this much of a space exploration fanboy manchild
space is BORING AS FUCK stop pretending that getting off of this planet would magically solve all of your problems
>>7641197
wow pleb
What does /sci/ think of timed tests? I think they are bullshit.
My chemistry professor gives us a timeframe on our exams so we have about one minute per problem. Now, I understand everything conceptually, but math is not my strong point, so I need time to set up full dimensional analysis or work through calculations in a formula a step at a time, and doing this I get most of the practice and homework problems right, but I only get low B's and C's on exams cause with the time limit not only is feeling rushed working against me, but he expects us to know immediately...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
there is a difference between solving the problem in 1 minutes and 10 minutes. you challenge yourself to work faster. whats wrong with that ?
I agree with you, but what are you going to do, fail? Man up and get gud. Become exceptional.
>>7640804
Their is no math in chemistry that should take longer than a minute. You don't know the concepts
How bad is glyphosate?
>>7640669
About as bad as people's comprehension of basic ecology, evolution, and glyphosate's degradation rate. Have fun dumping on more and more to combat an increasingly resistant population. Have fun with that soil accumulation.
Round-up ready is garbage, laughable, infantile engineering. Genetic engineering has potential as of yet far untapped. This fucking irresponsible joke is not something to applaud, it's a disgrace. It's banal. It's shameful.. Unfortunately, real innovations like won't...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7640684
Oh look, it's the anti-science naturalnews faggot...
>>7640692
Oh look, it's that person that doesn't realize they're religious.