Fact or fiction?
>>7641002
You can keep an object moving straight forever in a 0G vacuum due to inertia
Impossible.
>>7641014
That's not infinite energy though. If the system doesn't have continuous net output it's not a "perpetual motion machine."
Ideal perpetual motions from were we can extract work is bullshit. A fucking ideal pendulum is perpetual but you can only storge energy in them. There are actual kinetic storages that uses large rotatory discs.
Fuk off
>>7641041
It would be (if you could do it) a perpetual motion machine of the third kind, just not the first.
>>7641014
doesn't count
>>7641002
Fact.
It is a fact that perpetual motion machines are impossible.
https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm
Isn't fossil fuels power perpetuum mobile? Energy we get from the fuels is greater than the energy we need to use to mine them, so this system generates more energy than it consumes
>>7641002
Option 3: Shit thread and kill yourself OP.
>>7641002
Equal and opposite.
>>7641002
friction
>>7641695
Man this is like gradeschool tier.
Any Horschman Effect device can function as a perpetual motion machine in a gravity well by 7th order translation. Don't they teach you earthlings anything?
Or do I have to point out that this is also technically a reactionless thruster
>motion which continues perpetually
technically impossible, possible for all effective purposes
>motion which continues perpetually which you can extract energy from
no
>>7641615
Did you take into account the energy it took for those to be created in the first place?
>>7641002
Fiction,
but I can build a device that takes energy from the environment in such a manner that people mistake it as a perpetual motion machine all the time.
My test model even had some of my physics professors getting angry as they couldn't figure out where all the energy was coming from, but were smart enough to refused to consider it an over unity device as it was not one.
>>7641002
Fiction
/thread
