Many of the pictures taken on my Motorola Nexus 6 look better than the ones taken on my old Canon S95 under the same conditions. The camera on this phone is considered to be just average compared to other phones. Have modern mobile phone cameras finally surpassed the S95 in IQ?
>>2805428
>Many of the pictures taken on my Motorola Nexus 6 look better than the ones taken on my old Canon S95 under the same conditions.
Doubt it.
>>2805428
Under what conditions? In daylight, phone cameras have been really good for quite a while. In artificial lighting, my S90 is still better than my Sony Z1, especially with a bit of raw processing.
Also, zoom and flash.
Just took a couple of pics to compare the S95 (left) and the Nexus 6 (right). What do you think?
How do you usually edit your photos? Do you use any other software than photoshop? Do you have any tips or tricks?! Post them here!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2013:07:11 01:20:39 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 900 Image Height 597
Beginner here.
I tend to just use Lightroom.
Might start trying out Adobe Colour in future.
I'm fine just with ligtroom
I usually dont. When I take photos, it's either they are absolute shit, or I'm happy enough to keep them.
I'm also pretty inept at editing anyways, so I don't think it matters if I were to want to or not, because I cant.
I don't take photos of anything I'm getting paid for, it's just an outlet and fun thing for me, so I'm okay with whatever my camera produces.
Maybe I'll learn soon tho. I would like to be a better photographer.
How can you stand out as a photographer in a society where each person is exposed to literally thousands of photographs every day?
What's the point in even trying when you are competing against LITERALLY millions of other semi-pro photographers, and this does not even include the billion or so people who upload cell phone pics.
Is it even possible to stand out in this day and age?
Why compete? Why try to stand out? These are selfish, negative actions that will only create negative reactions.
Create for the joy of creation. That should be your goal.
>>2805347
I think he's considering it from the perspective of somebody who wants to become a professional photographer
>>2805352
I think that comes second
Hey! Want to buy ring flash for macro photo, but is it possible to use it normal way for shooting portraits or using in light setups? It has light source, why not?
>>2805305
Most cheap macro lights aren't useful for portraits because they don't put out nearly enough light. Ring lights for portraiture are very very bright, and the cheap ones cost around $500.
Yeah those are useless for anything other than macro. The ring flashes used for portraits are a different thing entirely.
>>2805310
Whats about YN-14EX? Looks powerfull enought to shoot at distances.
Can attach a softbox to it and use like regular flash?
>>2804946
Too many apologies and too few insults. No tripfag hate.
>>2805456
Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe I'm sugar. Maybe I'm isi. Maybe I'm just a nameless queer. You will never know.
Is it possible to achieve a picture like pic related with a Nikon D600 with a Tamron 18-270mm lens? If not, what should I change? What settings should I have to make the same kind of picture
>>2804944
You will need to add some sort of reflector to your kit, but what you have currently will certainly work, camera wise.
For settings, it will depend on the light source, but if you're shooting in daylight like that, ISO 100, somewhere around 100mm, f/8, and whatever shutter speed you need to use to not blow the highlights on your subject.
The sun is camera right, so your reflector would be camera left filling in the shadows on the subject.
You mean, a well lit portrait with the background out of focus??? Just learn how to take portraits. Yes you can do it with your gear.
>>2804944
I told you off in an earlier thread you posted for buying prematurely and without thinking. I hadn't realised that you were this green, my apologies.
Your combination is fine. Check out some portrait techniques around the web to learn about defocusing the background.
Long story short you want to use the long end of your lens (270mm) to achieve this effect. The issue with your lens though (as I pointed out) is that I know this lens at its long end is pretty soft looking. It isn't made for...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
What do you all think of these? First time shooting since the trees started coming in.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D80 Camera Software VSCO Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:27 23:52:23 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Cloudy Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 0.00 mm Comment Processed with VSCO with hb2 preset Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2294 Image Height 1536 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D80 Camera Software VSCO Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:27 23:53:09 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Cloudy Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 0.00 mm Comment Processed with VSCO with hb2 preset Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2294 Image Height 1536 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
kill yourself joe
I want to print some digital images on photographic paper.
To make the story simple, they are all mindbendingly horrible pornographic images, and I would like them to remain unseen.
So, how do I get them printed without buying a printer that works with glossy paper, and also without needing a big hat, big pair of sunglasses, false beard and a trenchcoat?
Turtleneck image unrelated because they are universally loved.
>>2804769
How about getting them printed online?
Read their terms of service and check if you are allowed to print it there. Some people in a printing plant somewhere will know that you are a pervert but they'll never meet you. Man I love turtlenecks.
Turtlenecks are fucking terrible. Just... the worst possible shirt, both to wear and to see being worn. I've never been excited to meet someone wearing a turtleneck. I know that there's a ponytail somewhere in their past or future, and they probably own one pair of leather sandals.
>>2804797
Why, just why?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyjnDnaWINE
>>2804541
wy?
Butthurt DSLR user? Face it mirrorless is just better.
Technology progresses and new tech emerges that is better than old tech. Oh noes!
>Given one day to do an assignment in photography class
>I have to "photograph a poem or song"
I can't think of anything that's not cringe worthy kinda stuff like pic related or some black and white photo of me in pain with some fucking shitty linkin park lyrics photoshopped in.
I'll probably try and take a picture of a cracked egg and call it humpty dumpty, but I want to do something good.. I have a lifesize poseable skeleton I can use for something too maybe.
Have any of...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2804458
Songs would be an easier choice, personally. Just a frame of reference, let's use the Rolling Stones as an example. Specifically, their song "Paint It Black." The very first lyrics are "I see a red door, and I want it painted black."
So as a photo, you could just take the lyric literally as a photo of someone in the process of painting a red door black.
That's a very simple (and pretty crappy) way of doing it, so I'd stretch out your creativity and see how complex you...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2804472
I appreciate your post, thankyou
>>2804458
>I can't think of anything that's not cringe worthy kinda stuff like pic related or some black and white photo of me in pain with some fucking shitty linkin park lyrics photoshopped in.
Use "Melancholy Man" by The Moody Blues.
You can literally do a sad photo of yourself without lyrics.
http://lyrics.wikia.com/wiki/The_Moody_Blues:Melancholy_Man
better framing techniques? tell me how to take professional pictures.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot SX510 HS Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Lens Size 4.30 - 129.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.01 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2016:01:03 02:14:18 Exposure Time 1/5 sec F-Number f/3.4 ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/3.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1080 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Tv-Priority Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Center-Weighted Sharpness Normal Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode Single Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Superfine Macro Mode Normal Subject Distance 65.530 m White Balance Tungsten Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 192 Image Number 113-2362
another picture i have taken on my camera.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot SX510 HS Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Lens Size 4.30 - 129.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.01 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2016:01:03 21:22:37 Exposure Time 1/5 sec F-Number f/5.0 ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1080 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Tv-Priority Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Center-Weighted Sharpness Normal Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode Single Drive Mode Single Flash Mode On Compression Setting Superfine Macro Mode Normal Subject Distance 65.530 m Flash Bias -2.00 EV White Balance Tungsten Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 224 Image Number 113-2541
i had to get down low to take this picture.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot SX510 HS Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Lens Size 4.30 - 129.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.01 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2015:11:14 23:45:47 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/4.5 ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1080 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative Sharpness Normal Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode Single Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Superfine Macro Mode Normal Subject Distance 65.530 m White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Image Number 109-1967
any cc: VERY appreciated.
I have been taking pictures for a month now with a dslr. I use a nikon d3100. How to get better? Be strong with your comments. How can I play with the white balance to make my pictures better during a sunny day like this?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3100 Camera Software Ver.1.01 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 848 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:22 17:36:50 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/18.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4608 Image Height 3072 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown ISO Speed Used 100 Image Quality FINE White Balance SUNNY Focus Mode MANUAL Flash Setting REAR Flash Compensation 0.0 EV ISO Speed Requested 100 Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 162111488.0 EV Lens Type Nikon D Series Lens Range 18.0 - 55.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 22387
also one of mine.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3100 Camera Software Ver.1.01 Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 848 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 57 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:27 17:58:24 Exposure Time 1/800 sec F-Number f/25.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Shade Flash No Flash Focal Length 38.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4608 Image Height 3072 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown ISO Speed Used 200 Image Quality FINE White Balance SHADE Focus Mode MANUAL Flash Setting REAR Flash Compensation 0.0 EV ISO Speed Requested 200 Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 162111488.0 EV Lens Type Nikon D Series Lens Range 18.0 - 55.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 22661
nice pics.
I used to own a D3300 (almost the same as yours) and I figure I had a decent start with it
the photos are rather beautiful for a beginner
also, post production is the key, so you should get a hang of that if you already haven't, but not always
>>2803286
Thanks. I will learn how to use photoshop in the near future.
Be honest, be brutal if you have to, but be constructive please.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T5i Equipment Make Canon Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Unknown White Balance Auto Metering Mode Unknown Image Height 546 Focal Length 35.00 mm Flash No Flash Image Created 2015:08:09 01:31:55 Light Source Unknown Image Width 819
>>2803242
boring, low resolution and out of focus bad composition and generally uninteresting
>>2803242
Bad background. Out of focus. Post in recent photo thread.
>>2803260
LOL res is based on need to crop, but I understand the issue lol thanks for it. Anything you like about it? Things I can repeat?
>current year
>actually printing images out on physical sheets of paper
why.pcx
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5100 Camera Software Ver.1.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 860 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 33 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2012:02:02 12:32:23 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 22.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2464 Image Height 1632 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown ISO Speed Used 800 Image Quality NORMAL White Balance AUTO Focus Mode AF-A Flash Setting NORMAL Flash Compensation 0.0 EV ISO Speed Requested 800 Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV Lens Type Nikon G Series Lens Range 18.0 - 55.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 1005 Digital Vari-Program CHILD
>why
If I print something, it's likely to stay with me or who I gift it to for a while. It's something that someone can show their friends/relatives after they've gotten a new phone or laptop.
It's also not a disposable piece of paper like the trash that enters your door, a bill, a bank statement, a newspaper, a leaflet promoting a business or a takeaway menu. All that shit is not only a waste of paper but a waste of ink. It's something I won't ever have an attachment to.
A photo though? I'm more likely...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2802720
WOW it is the_current_year (no fucking shit), are we still doing a thing?!
People like to print; it's more permanent and displayable than just keeping it on an SD card or something, so if you have the money and it's a good photo that you really like, why not?
>>2802720
Because when I work late at the office I can print out as much as I like without anyone chewing my ass out.
New to photography, how am i doing?
Terrible, resize your images to something sensible and then fucking kill yourself
I agree that it needs resized but I kinda like it.
I think you got lucky with a very generic long exposure, though, and I think the scene is too busy.
You can explore the theme further and with more care.