Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 31. page
- Home
- Board: /p/ - Photography
- Reading: Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 31. page
Eat my ass mods
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 600 Image Height 589 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 06:51:52 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 490
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3437 Image Height 3586 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 08:07:05 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 515
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 736 Image Height 735 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 05:06:52 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 500
>>2860060
This fuckin twat.
Going to several abandoned buildings within a week, anyone got tips or suggestions on this subject of phototherapy?
On mobile sorry for shitty pic, bump
>>2859284
do i have a problem if i think every new thread is a troll thread?
>>2859290
Nah, you're probably only wrong about 14% of the time.
What is the best camera? Forget the price for a bit, if you could choose one body and one lens what would they be and why?
Latest Hasselblad and some top 30-35mm equivalent lens.
Other option - unlimited time on James Webb Space Telescope
>>2859256
Fujifilm X-T1 is the best camera, my lens choice would be the FUJINON XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR lens, why this lens? Because it is optically perfect and 16mm is the PERFECT and only correct choice for shooting architecture.
An X-Pro2 would be an equally perfect choice depending on your shooting style and the subject with any Fujifilm lens because they are all amazing.
>inb4 shill
Yeah, because I would be that fucking autist walking around with a MF camera setup that thinks his images would be better in any way by lugging a brick around.
Contax 645 with the planar 80 f2 and a Phase One iq3 back
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2012:09:12 19:37:33 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 919 Image Height 821
How do yall think this pic was taken? It looks too good to be stitched, i have to assume the camera was held above her arm but like its clearly over here.. yet not in the reflection.. im confused
op here. Nevermind. Its totally stitched. Such an awesome looking pic tho.
Zoom into her left pinky and the reflection is hella 2d. Cant believe i didnt see that earlier
>>2858562
A good trick if you can pull it off is to have someone with almost exactly the same hand as the model to stand between the photog and the model and make him/her touch the model hand, that way it will look like it's a mirror shot. I don't know if i made it clear, if not ask me
>>2858562
It's possible that it's not a reflection. Look at the angle of the arms. The girl we're looking at's arm comes down from above, and then bends hard at the wrist. It's also coming in slightly from right to left (shoulder to hand). The arm closest to us comes up from below, and doesn't look like it's moving over to the left towards us where the shoulder should be. It could just be a strange perspective from where the camera is actually placed messing with me, but I see it as a different person's hand.
What went wrong?
>>2857121
anyone mind mirroring the image so i can properly make out what the OP's autisming about?
women think they can be photographers roflmao
>>2857121
her parents fucked and had her. that's what...
Really, really, really newfag here. I have never really touched photography until the last few weeks. So, what sites I should visit to get me started? Any tips also welcome.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2000 Image Height 1333 Scene Capture Type Standard
read the sticky. there are some image dumps linked there that have some good photos from /p/haggots
leave here and don't ever come back OP this website will do nothing but make you worse and ruin photography for you
>>2856838
>someone said something mean about my picture :(
If you want harsh critique which will ultimately make you a better photographer then this site is the best out there.
assorted critique.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 650D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:04 16:29:19 Exposure Time 1/10 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 650D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:04 16:27:24 Exposure Time 0.8 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 47.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 650D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:04 16:25:13 Exposure Time 0.8 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2855268
This one looks like it was taken by mistake when you were fiddling with your camera. What is the focus of this picture?
1/9
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX RICOH IMAGING Camera Model GR Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 22:28:44 Exposure Time 1/180 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 7.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
2/9
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX RICOH IMAGING Camera Model GR Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 22:29:17 Exposure Time 1/180 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 7.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 662 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
3/9
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX RICOH IMAGING Camera Model GR Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 22:29:53 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/13.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/13.0 Brightness 8.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
4/9
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX RICOH IMAGING Camera Model GR Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 22:30:40 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/9.8 Brightness 6.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
Old one >>2846256
>>2849109
Are there any good straps I can get for my XT1 that can utilize the circular camera lugs?
I mean, without having to attach the additional triangular parts..
>>2849124
Art and artisan have some that will do the job but they are expensive and arent overly long.
>>2849132
And they take quite a while to wear in.
If you get one of recommend wearing it round your neck all the time until the leather loosens up around the lugs
Hey guys so lately I've been watching an sprouse bro, and I like how he does the editing, and how take the pictures, and I don't know shit so please SOS. i really want to know how.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 601 Image Height 751
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 618 Image Height 824
>>2860317
For this one you just need to miss focus completely, and have it in black and white.
>>2860315
cole sprouse is a fucking shit pnormie photog who needs his captions to sell an image
Serious question. Why is do most people prefer Canon for portrait photography over Canon. I got to meet with a few photographers on salary (they all work at Sephora at SF) to collaborate for an editorial shoot and everyone had either a Mark II or III; my first and only DSLR is the D810 and although I never feel gimped when taking studio pictures, I always wondered why 500px and such is mostly Canon.
>>2859810
>Canon for portrait photography over Canon
stupid mistake, "over nikon"
>>2859810
I don't think as many people truly "prefer" one brand over the other. You get people who are incredibly defensive about their kit in order to shake off the feeling of buyer's remorse but most people don't care that much outside of keyboard warriors and brand whores on the internet.
I think Canon gets a lot more exposure and mention and people in general will be attracted to them because of that, and because they haven't explored alternatives like Nikon, Sony or Pentax.
I work as an electronics salesman and when people come in to buy D-SLRs a lot of them go for the D3300 or D5300 over the Canon alternatives. Overall I believe Canon is still the top selling brand but that doesn't mean much. They're all pretty good.
>>2859810
Canon lost a lot of the market share during the Vietnam War to Nikon which is why Nikon is thing. Canon regained a huge amount of that market share back when they released the first competent digital cameras and some seriously nice telephotos. Since it was a hard switch to the EF mount people had to invest into the system and people are reluctant divest to jump ship to another brand. They've also been around forever giving them a strong sense of stability. Sure the Sony whatever is a great camera but it would cost a fortune to switch it. The Nikon 810 is also pretty incredible but again, the cost switch is high. Camera bodies only stay relevant for so long but lenses stick around for quite awhile. Much to contrary of the internet the Canon bodies out there right now are quite good (this is less true for affordable video) and there is faith that Canon (and Nikon) will continue to make great cameras.
TL;DR Canon made the first good and accessible digital cameras and people are reluctant to switch to something else.
if i wanted to make 35mm slides for projection, do I need transparency film (which i guess is hard to film these days), or can I just use any standard 35mm film? if not, anyone know where I can go about getting transparency film?
>>2859771
If you use standard 35mm film (Print film) all your colors and tones will be reversed. Blue will look orange, skin tones will look blue-green, and bright skies will look black, and dark things will look light.
For projection, you'd want slide film.
>>2859771
It's called slide film, because it's what you can put in slides right after development.
I'm sure there are ways to get normal reversal film onto slides as well. Obviously you can't use those as slides as they are. I've never even thought about it.
>which i guess is hard to film these days
What does this mean? Harder to find? No, some popular film types today have slide versions, and all the important slide-only film is still around.
You're gonna pay more for slides, and slides require slightly more skill than reversal (as in you actually need to expose for it,) but it's practically like shooting with a digital camera in terms of DR.
If you shoot color film in any way seriously, you should be using slides. It's the only way to get the colors you want every time.
>>2859771
You can shoot negatives and have them printed in slides. That's how filmmakers have been doing for decades.
Unfortunately, you'll need a lab that works with motion picture stock, and unless you have tons and tons of negatives they'll either refuse to do it or take all your money.
There's a relay for life (big cancer fundraiser) going on near me soon and I feel there's a great opportunity for some good photos, however I always feel nervous/anxious whenever I take photos of people. what do
>>2859638
Go out and do it faggot, read up on exposure therapy
Just do it, most people don't give a damn about you taking photos of them if they are on the street. Also they can sense if you are nervous, so relax and you'll look like you really know what you are doing
>>2859649
>people don't care UNLESS YOU'RE NERVOUS DON'T BE NERVOUS
Yeah right. Nobody will even notice you.
Shit on my snapshits, I wanna get better
guys I think I just invented the perfect universal analog to digital camera back
this is truly revolutionary
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model SM-T230NU Equipment Make SAMSUNG Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Unknown Image Width 1736 Image Created 2016:06:08 21:56:15 Image Height 1152 Focal Length 2.79 mm Exposure Time 0.1 sec ISO Speed Rating 200 Flash No Flash Exposure Bias 0 EV F-Number f/2.6 White Balance Auto
>>2859398
Nice shitpost.
>>2859398
oh my fuck. that is AWESOME! Better than those 35mm inserts that were being posted about this week.
Its only weird if it doesn't work
