Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 192. page
- Home
- Board: /p/ - Photography
- Reading: Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 192. page
Just had a fiddle to see what I could do with this technique - opinions, feedback, have you had any experience with the polygonal concept for editing?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:07 21:47:22
>>2716930
post more
It'd look a lot better if the background was polygonized as well.
>>2716930
i attempted this effect a while ago but wasn't as successful as i thought
i got too impatient
So I went in China 4 months ago.
Asking for C&C
what's up /p/, my camera got stolen with about 600 photos of sweden a month ago and now I finally have the money back. I had a simple D3100 with a friend's lens on it, looking for a bigger caliber now though.
I have about 600-1000 bucks to spend on a camera and will have more for a lens in the coming months. I'd like to stay digital if possible because film takes a shitload if time to process in my town compared to the mere minutes I need to export my RAWs.
What would you recommend me for travelling purposes/low light photos? (say parties, hikes, camping, random town strolls, smokey bars, etc.)
~thank you~
picture related, me and my cat buddy.
Also thinking about getting a Canon because of the bittersweet Magic Lantern software. Not sure though.
Hasselbald 500CM and a smattering of lenses because why the fuck not
Let's talk about the human factor. And no, not knowledge, composition and creativity and so on. I mean the bioligical aspects.
After years I finally found out what the deal is, with those AF-maniacs. For me it's like in the moment I found the M-adjust at my first SLR I (literally) never switched it back, and I really did not get all that "it's hard to manually focus with this lens/dof and blabla"-talk.
Until I got my eyes tested, and I got the highest values possible in all aspects. My eyes are literally perfect. Sharpness, low-light, colour. Everything. Perfect round eye-balls with superior shaped and clean lenses. The colour resolution is outstanding, said the doc. Also symetrics, I am able to recognize the slightest asymmetrics. My eyes are like a fucking precision measuring device.
For me this explained alot. Also e.g. when people struggeling with post-processing, and I always were like "can't you see this or that.. wtf".
So, as my eyes are like a Zeiss Planar with a Leica S sensor and some Arri Alexa post-processor behind, your eyes seem to be more like a toy-lens with a 1/8" VGA sensor and some parallel-port webcam post-processor behind.
Wouldn't you think having good eyes is like a pre-condition to be a good photographer? Like having good motorics and coordination is a pre-condition for being a good piano-player?
Spoiler: I actually don't believe this, but I wish I would. And furthermore: Unfortunately my good eyes does not make me a good photographer automatically. Bummer.
>>2718320
When you said "human factor" I thought this was going to be a discussion about how people like your photos more if your models are cute. Instead it's you shitposting about being too dumb to realize when a gay dude is macking on you.
Some people prefer MF, some prefer AF. It's really not that important.
Go look at some award-winning photos from the last decade. Notice how half of them are absolute shit technically? Your eyes mean nothing in this field.
Not to mention you're on /pee/. It's like you, working at mcdonalds, bragging to all the other mcdonalds employees about how you've memorized the number of tiles in the kitchen. Not only is it irrelevant and unremarkable, but if it somehow magically made you the best employee at that mcdonalds, you still work at mcdonalds.
tl;dr: 6/10 made me reply
Alex here, I'm blind as a bat and can't see shit 6 inches in front of me without contacts. Is this in focus?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Photographer Alex Burke Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2014:07:28 15:06:37 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 811 Image Height 1024
>>2718333
>Not to mention you're on /pee/. It's like you, working at mcdonalds, bragging to all the other mcdonalds employees about how you've memorized the number of tiles in the kitchen. Not only is it irrelevant and unremarkable, but if it somehow magically made you the best employee at that mcdonalds, you still work at mcdonalds.
haha holy shit
How do you get shadows like these in Post-Production?
>>2718268
I love this complete indiscriminate questions. Shadows like this. Yeah, like what? Deep? Soft? Desaturated? Contrast-rich but unclipped?
Specify you moron. And show what niveau you are talking on, so one know how to answer you. E.g.: would you understand if I say "x24y16"? Or do I have to explain you what a luminance curve is?
please vanish.
>>2718268
lift the blacks.
hey i want to do photo journalism type stuff with b&w film, ie. take photos of an event and be able to have them online that same day/night. can people give me advice on how to streamline the process to make it more efficient?
right now my thinking is that i will mix the chemicals before going out, have a few rolls of maybe 10 frames each, process at home, scan the negs and upload. still need to get a scanner and a darkbag to make loading / unloading the rolls easier.
mostly what i'm looking for is advice on how to mix chemicals in the most efficient and un-wasteful way possible for processing potentially small amounts of film. kodak keeps and makes a lot more chemical than ilford products, right?
anyway any help/advice appreciated.
>>2717361
some sort of film dryer would help MASSIVELY, as i think that, and scanning speed, are gonna be your weakest link
>>2717361
use warmer than suggested chemistry to cut development time, do final rinse in isopropyl alcohol.
get a Kodak/Pakon F135 film scanner, or other scanner designed for lab use. resolution will be low like 4x6 printing low, but a lot faster than other scanners.
don't expect that your negs will be 100% archival, and if your chemistry is too warm you can completely separate the emulsion from the film base.
>>2717361
I'm a working photojournalist. I shoot film as well but not for events. Care to explain why you're bothering to do this?
Just curious because the central commandment of photojournalism is 'get the shot' and you're infinitely less likely to do so with film.
last roll of fuji superia
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-29_31 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 78 dpcm Vertical Resolution 78 dpcm Image Created 2015:11:18 21:28:06 Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-29_31 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 78 dpcm Vertical Resolution 78 dpcm Image Created 2015:11:18 21:40:52 Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-29_31 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 78 dpcm Vertical Resolution 78 dpcm Image Created 2015:11:18 23:24:28 Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-29_31 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 78 dpcm Vertical Resolution 78 dpcm Image Created 2015:12:09 06:00:45 Color Space Information sRGB
I bought a gray card but it's too big for me to carry around. What am I supposed to do with this thing even?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make samsung Camera Model SM-G900P Camera Software G900PVPU3BOG1 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 31 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2048 Image Height 1152 Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:08 10:34:52 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 80 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 2.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash Flash Focal Length 4.80 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1152 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID F16QLHF01SB
>>2717683
>I buy things without knowing why
>>2717683
I think those are pretty much unnecessary now that you can just change the white balance in lightroom.
>>2717702
lolwut.
Hi, I'm new to photography and after having had my film developed, I noticed most (80%) didn't turn out so well.
I had gone out at night to take pictures and this is clearly noticeable as there is a lack of contrast in my pics, and not enough light entering. Do I require a flash?
Also, I noticed that the pics are very grainy, is this due to the film (im using kodak gold 200) or could it be the iso that I set to 800? I thought you should set the iso to 800 around night?
I'd really appreciate some feedback so I'm going to upload some pics.
I got these developed at Costco so could this be a factor?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1545 Image Height 1024
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1545 Image Height 1024
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1545 Image Height 1024
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1545 Image Height 1024
What, specifically, did this guy do to get this look in post?
I'm talking curves, layers, gradient maps? How can I emulate this?
Images like the one on the left are a good example.
http://time.com/4070686/paraguay-soy-plantations-war/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015-10-12T20:59:20-04:00 Image Width 2560 Image Height 2560
shot film
Why don't you ask him?
FILM
I
L
M
You can achieve that quite easily without any PP at all.
What camera is this?
>>2716363
If you can give me a good reason for why you care, I'll tell you.
>>2716365
To know if my gf is hanging with her photographer friend out too much?
>>2716366
pls delete your kuk fantasy thread. thank you
The thing is, I want to become a professional photographer.
But I don't like Zoom lenses. Only primes can deliver the results I want.
So instead of using one single camera with zoom lenses to cover from portrait to group photos. I will try to use two DSLR, one with a 50mm 1.4, other with a 24mm 1.8
But to make things faster, I want to be able to shoot from my left hand.
Is it possible?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON Camera Model COOLPIX S220 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.1 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2010:04:24 13:26:49 Exposure Time 1/130 sec F-Number f/3.1 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 80 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 6.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 620 Image Height 426 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
SAY CHEESE, MOTHERFUCKERS
>laughingwhores.jpg
OP is a cripple. LOL.
>>2716215
Dude what
How far have you gone to take a picture? Was it worth it? Was it fun?
I climbed through 20m of forestry and up a hill to get to this section of a railroad. I'm a completely novice photographer and I my camera started losing focus in the low light. It was not really worth it but it was okay.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT Lens Size 75.00 - 300.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware 1.0.1 Owner Name unknown Serial Number 0520300235 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:25 04:22:00 Exposure Time 1/13 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Landscape Mode ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3456 Image Height 2304 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative Sharpness High Saturation High Contrast High Shooting Mode Landscape Image Size Large Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Red-Eye Reduction (Auto) Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 192 Camera Actuations 837157042 Color Matrix 0
I then moved onto the railroad bridge. I was spooked when some of the mesh walkway wobbled down under my feet, so I walked on the wooden beams. A bad photo from poor exposure, I will find out how to fix this for my future photographs.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:05 22:10:39 Exposure Time 1.3 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Landscape Mode ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 22.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2304 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Ive jumped fences, climbed steep embankments, fallen off a sailboat, got attacked by a pelican, got hit by a 300lb black woman, gotten bitched out by a 100lb white woman, kicked out of buildings.
Nothing is too far.
I climbed 600 feet up a radio tower, by myself, at like 3 AM, in the rain, ultimately... Was probably not worth it, but I still had fun. I was up so high that I was above the clouds. It was really sick.
Alamby appears before you and offers you two choices:
1. She is your slave forever
2. Any camera under $10k
Which do you choose?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 4S Camera Software iPhoto 9.5.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2013:08:31 14:14:42 Exposure Time 1/3067 sec F-Number f/2.4 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Brightness 10.8 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.28 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1766 Image Height 1766 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2715959
>hurr durr not making her prostitute herself for over $10k
God fucking damn she's adorable.
#3, roll with "the crew" taking photos and fucking shit up on the streets of HK.
Does anyone fuck with toy cameras? Thinking of gifting my brother a Diana F+ kit for Christmas. What does /p/ think of them?
>>2715928
theyre real shitty on purpose. they are literal meme cameras for hipsters (hipster tax included).
get him a small film dslr with a 50mm and a handful of film. same money, but much better buy.
>>2715928
Sure, if you really hate your brother this much.. go for it then.
Otherwise, get him a nice film compact to fuck with.
>>2715928
i was given one. literally shite.
i cant imagine why anyone would pay 50 quid for a plastic piece of shit.
you can buy a fed 4 for the same money. still has the hipster vibe but is actually usable.
