Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 184. page
- Home
- Board: /p/ - Photography
- Reading: Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 184. page
What does /p/ scan their negatives with? I'm planning to shoot a roll of 35mm film and was wondering if any of you guys have had any luck scanning your negatives through an ordinary printer/scanner device (not meant specifically for photographs). I've also heard of using a DSLR to capture negatives. I'm on a budget so I'm looking for a cheap alternative. Thanks.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2011:07:14 17:17:28 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 620 Image Height 388
>>2717359
Pic related is my printer/scanner. I'm also going to community college so that also might be an option, although I haven't took a photography class or know anyone in that department. Walgreens/CVS scans photos, the results aren't very good though from what I've researched.
This if I'm making a large print and/or for paid work.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SAMSUNG TECHWIN Camera Model NV40, VLUU NV40, LANDIAO NV103, VLUU NV404 Camera Software 809011 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 34 mm Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.9 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2009:11:04 16:56:49 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown Exposure Time 1/10 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 6.20 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 912 Image Height 684
>>2717381
and this the other 99% of the time.
Hey /p/, I bought a used camera yesterday and took a couple of pictures today. When I come home to edit them, I realize that the pictures are 16 mbs in size, and they come in a CR2 format? Is there any way I can change the size of the pictures and change the format, if not, is it something that has to do with the camera itself?
help?????
>>2724921
Could you truly not have used google for this?
>>2724941
suppose I could. can you answer my question?
>2015 is almost ded.
>/p/ makes a book everi year.
It will make one this year.
Someone needs to elect themselves as leader, collect submissions, coordinate a group of curators, and assemble that shitfight into something that can be printed and bound and bought by the overly keen, or downloaded as a pdf by everyone else.
This is the thread where the leader will be chosen.
This is the thread where we will determine the categories and criteria for selection.
I humbly submit that this years book should be split into two halves, B&W and Colour, because having them mixed in together makes for a very jarring viewing experience.
I also humbly submit that only photos posted on /p/ in the 2015 calendar year should be eligible.
None of this niksudrabs or gervin swooping in and getting 6 submissions because he put a link in a fucking flickr thread one time bullshit.
If you didn't participate in the board, you don't get /p/ book glory.
>let the shitfight begin
I am the Führer. I will also be a curator of this fucking book. Don't have the nerves to wait for Iggy put his shit together this time. Color & B/W. Every anon can submit three images.
Anyone against what I just wrote? No? Good. The entire thing (rules etc) will be posted tomorrow.
Who wants to be a curator?
>>2723473
No curation this year. It's antithetical to /p/ and the democratic nature of 4chins.
>>2723463
Whats ISI's instagram account? Who the fuck is isi
Does anyone else have trouble pushing themselves to go out in the world to take photos? I'm such a solitary homebody that sometimes it's difficult to get out and engage.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software Shotwell 0.18.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
>Does anyone else have trouble pushing themselves to go out in the world to take photos?
literally everyone on this autistmal dungeon of a board to be honest
>>2722038
I go outside, but mostly just the same places and I feel like everything I take is routine. I need a vacation
>>2722038
>Does anyone else have trouble pushing themselves to go out in the world to take photos?
literally nope.
what i lack is apt vision for getting a driver license, which is a real bummer. no amazing landscapes for me i guess.
Pls no more than 1000px/1MB.
Be nice, but not too nice.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 360 dpi Vertical Resolution 360 dpi Image Created 2015:12:07 23:03:59
Comments?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 200 dpi Vertical Resolution 200 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:08 02:00:46
>>2717201
You've posted other stuff from this work site, right?
Should I feel guilty about wanting to shoot a young model friend of mine wearing sexy outfits such as leather corsets and metal-studded chokers? What about sexy adult Halloween costumes? Or Victoria Secret lingerie? At what age should it be not be considered unethical or just too creepy for each of those items? Seriously.
Inb4: why would I want to wear such things while taking photos. Yeah, and one morning Groucho Marx shot an elephant in his pajamas (how he got in his pajamas is a mystery).
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
Is this supposed to be funny .. or what?
>>2715496
Only the reference to Groucho. Seriously wondering if /p/ would shoot or not, given the opportunity. I already have some wonderfully inappropriate clothing. Just don't know if I would be able to edit the photos afterwards without feeling terribly ... guilty.
>>2715482
No need for guilt because there's 0 chance for anything remotely sexual happening. Only a hyper autistic permavirgin would post as awkwardly and as humorlessly as this.
Hello /p/. I've had a Sony DSLR from the alpha series for a few years, and have enjoyed it, though I would like to take a step up. I've been looking into and considering taking on the Pentax line, and would like some recommendations, reviews, and comments you guys may have with regards to Pentax.
My intended first model might be the K3-II. Please let me know,
Thanks!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSLR-A900 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5845 Image Height 3732 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2014:03:22 18:30:18 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 2500 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Brightness -2.1 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Daylight Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 766 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation High Sharpness Normal
>>2725019
I just noticed the coincidence of the exif data for this photo provided. It's not mine, but I do like it a lot.
My Sony is on the lower end of the line.
>>2725019
For what.
What are the limitations of your current camera that are making you want to step "up" to a Pentax?
>>2725024
First of all, I want to change to a different product line (Pentax looks good), and secondly mine is lower end so I want increased quality.
I see absolutely no reason to keep going higher, as something like the K3-II is totally fine.
I'm assuming as a whole, you guys would know much more about them, as a product, a line, and a company, than I would.
Anyone here do back button focusing? I just started trying it out and I'm not did if I like it yet.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D40 Camera Software Ver.1.10 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 690 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2011:07:20 20:01:18 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Exposure Bias 1/3 EV Subject Distance Infinity Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2722444
Not sure*
Damn phone
>>2722444
Yes.
I do, and I love it.
What is your subject material?
Should I get a 35mm DX 1.8G prime lens or stick with the kit lens for my first camera (Nikon D3300) ?
>>2718624
gear thread you cunt
Listen to me bro. I have a d3100 and i have bought recently the 35mm dx 1.8. I quit to use the 18-55mm. The quality and the sharpness of the 35mm lens is beautifull.
>>2718624
You should stick with the 18-55 for your first step in photography.
The 35mm should be useful later when you will know what you can and can't do with it.
So /p/ why haven't you bought your Leica Monochrom yet? Don't you know that color is vulgar?
>>2725149
you dont own one either. go away, poorfag.
>>2725149
if this shall be ironic then you obviously have no clue how sensors work and where the advantage of a non-beyer sensor is.
so go be "smart" somewhere else.
Ignoring obvious shit bait...
Because I prefer Tri-X in my M6.
I'm considering selling my dad's old Nikon "Nikkor" F, basically the chrome version of pic related, with the Nikkor Auto-s 50/1.4 and its case, all in good condition.
Apparently these are quite rare, only made for the German market.
Anyone got an idea what it might be worth? If it's only a bit more than a regular one I'll probably keep it, cause it's a fun camera. I could only find one sold on ebay but it had a "Nikkor" Photomic finder so I'm not sure the price it sold for is a good indication.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2008:06:12 15:40:09
>>2724845
don't sell it. you'll regret it
>>2724845
Zenit-E is MUCH better.
>>2724845
>Apparently these are quite rare, only made for the German market.
Pretty sure it's just a regular Nikon F.
Only with a different label to avoid the trade dispute raised by Carl Zeiss (Nikon is too similar to Ikon)
I doubt people will pay extra for the different name, but with hipsters you never know.
Post hot girls with sexy cameras
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1600 Image Height 900
what does she think she is doing. that tripod isnt even on all of its legs
whats the purpose of a tripod if it isnt stable on the ground
Well fuck me /p/, my sister just asked me to photograph her wedding tomorrow.
Now before you tell me to not do it, hear me out. Tomorrow is what we call the "civil" marriage at the courthouse, and it's supposed to be small and quick. Only family and close friends, sign the papers before a judge, exchange some rings, read some stuff. No bridal gown or tuxes, but formal wear nonetheless. Should be done in 45 minutes or so. The big event will be the "religious wedding" at a church with a priest, and that's when the tuxes and gowns and lots of guests will be happening. That's in 6 months and my sister has hired a proper photographer for that.
Nonetheless I don't want to fuck it up, despite my sister telling me she's happy with only 10 pictures. I have no idea what the venue looks like. I've used off-camera flash in a studio environment but have very little experience with events.
Here's what I've got:
- Fujifilm X-T1
- Fujifilm X100S
- 18-55 f/2.8-4 lens kit with OIS
- 16-55 f/2.8
- The following primes: 14/2.8, 16/1.4, 23/1.4, 35/1.4, 56/1.2, 90/2 (X-T1 is crop sensor so the FF equivalents are 21, 24, 35, 50, 85, and 135mm)
- A couple of Yongnuo flashes + wireless transmitter
- A smalled Fujifilm flash
- Spare batteries and memory cards
I'm thinking of bringing both cameras, the 90mm, and the zooms. I tend to avoid shooting at less than 1/100th of a second since my hands aren't the steadiest, so if the venue is dark I'll go for the kit lens since it has pretty good OIS. I don't want to use flash but I'll bring a Yongnuo just in case.
>shooting poorly lit events with mirrorless
How badly did I fuck up? What else should I know before going in there blindly?
>>2724879
Always shoot from the brides side.
Include parents, ring stuff, family and friends.
Make a group shot at the end.
I'd bring the 16-55/2.8 with one body and the 56/1.2 with the other.
I have no idea what I'm talking about though.
>>2724879
I don't know if they'll let you use a flash inside the courtroom for photos so it'd be best to go with >>2724928 and bring fast glass. But yes, bring the Yongnuo just in case they do.
Move around as much as you can. Now, don't go up to the judges stand there and play with the damn gavel but maybe set specific boundries before the preceding and stick within them. However make sure you pre-frame the shots (if you can) so you have the best angles possible. I think your sister would apperciate it more if you can try and get her husband-to-be in in the pics too, just a thought.
>>2724879
Do you not own a tripod?
I'd probably try to bring the smallest amount of gear possible. X-T1 and the 50 and 85mm primes would be your best bet, since you're going to be taking mostly candid portraits.
>A thread for sharing great experiences you've had because you are a photographer, that you would not have had otherwise.
Personally, I've been to more cities, and seen more sights along the way, than I EVER would have without the job. I'm grateful every day for the trips I get to take, and the things I would never have seen otherwise.
I traveled before I considered myself a photographer. Photography came first as a way to express the amazingness there.
But then again, it's not my job.
>>2724539
Doesn't have to be a job! Just thinks you did with a camera that you wouldn't have done without one! A side trip to take a photo, exploring down a dark alley you would have otherwise ignored, and happened to find a $20 bill! Just ways that photography has positively changed your life from what it would have been.
And share photos!
>>2724540
>A thread for sharing great experiences you've had because you are a photographer, that you would not have had otherwise.
>Personally, I've been to more cities, and seen more sights along the way, than I EVER would have without the job. I'm grateful every day for the trips I get to take, and the things I would never have seen otherwise.
>Doesn't have to be a job! Just thinks you did with a camera that you wouldn't have done without one! A side trip to take a photo, exploring down a dark alley you would have otherwise ignored, and happened to find a $20 bill! Just ways that photography has positively changed your life from what it would have been.
>And share photos!
OP its clear youre not from this board or even this site. You talk like a faggot blogger or something. Do your own shit and stop harvesting stuff from other people.
Fuck off.
SUDDENLY REALISED FILM IS NICE BUT IT'S EXPENSIVE AS FUCK HOLY SHIT WHAT HAVE I BEEN WASTING MY MONEY ON
TIME TO INVEST IN HIGH QUALITY DIGITAL THAT WILL STICK WITH ME FOREVER
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D40 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 838 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 42 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2012:11:02 20:24:07 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 280 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2550 Image Height 3300 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Landscape Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2718412
>FOREVER
kek
Average 35mm film camera with lens
>20EUR
Roll of film
>5EUR
Chemicals to develop at home
>50EUR
Scanner
>70EUR
Costs of getting started with film:
>less than 150EUR
Average DSLR
>700EUR
Memory Card
>30EUR
Costs of getting started digital:
>less than 750 EUR
Hasselblad CM500 + film
>750 EUR
Phase One XF
> :^)
At least come up with some bait that makes a little sense
>>2718421
>only needing one roll of film
>not counting opportunity cost of the extra time developing and scanning takes
okay
