Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 162. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
What would you do?
Budget $1799
for main photo editing computer:
A) Macbook pro 15"
16gb Ram
I7 Quadcore 2.5ghz
512GB ssd
2gb ddr5 Gefore GT750M
OR
HP envy DESKTOP
3.4 i7
16gb ram
256GB sssd + 1tb 7200 hdd
4GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
500W Power supply
+4k Monitor
>>2736582
Where are you getting that price on a 15" macbook pro retina? They start at $2000 new.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Photographer unknown Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000
>>2736584
b&h has the 2014's NIB at that price
so WHICH WOULD YOU GET
How to be a fine art photographer?
>The true price of any item is what somebody is willing to pay for it
be friends with the right people is 99% of it
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
http://www.chrisdixonphoto.com/galleries/ocean-art/
Hi /p/ I was wondering if you guys could give me some hints and help guide to me what I should buy to suit my purposes.
I am looking for a a way to film videos in clubs and other low light environments.
I am wondering about the type of camera I should buy and what lenses would be good.
My budget is around 1000-1500.
If possible I would like to fulfill the role of being able to film lectures. Meaning that it would have a good battery life and some means of storing a lot.
Any advice would be welcome.
Or would there be a camcorder that would be better for the job?
Get whichever body does the minimum frame and bit rates you need and spend the rest on fast primes. A 35mm preferably and something longer and hella cheap for your lecture shit
>>2735800
What would you recommend for filming say two people talking in a bar? In terms of frame and bit rate?
Creative filmmaking idea or ultra hipster?
https://youtu.be/g0iTKFWDxNE
It depends.
>>2735685
On?
>>2735689
what the product is used to create
Can someone tell me how to achieve this in ps? I tried some stuff but i can't seem to achieve exactly that.A tutorial would be nice, some similar stuff, or some ideas. Thanks.
>>2735247
solarize. now delete this shit thread ty.
>>2735251
tried that. i want the exact same thing, only 2 colors.
Bump. I'd like to do this to video. For my Kubrick psychedelic meltdown sequences, obviously.
Why photographers are usually so fucking ugly/fat or beta?
People behind the camera are usually people that wouldn't have a career in front of it.
>>2734590
Speak for yourself. I am awesomely good looking, I lift regularly and travel frequently to exotic cities, mountains and jungles where most people are scared to go alone. Girls often ask me to take their photo.
>>2734590
I don know about that because whenever /p/ has self portrait threads a lot of the cucks pictured are pretty good looking.
In honor of how good the Star Wars movie was.
What do you guys think?
>>2736163
panty lines and one of the worst facial expressions I've ever seen in a portrait. Also, the stick looks like a bed post.
Vignetting and obvious shadows make it pretty painful to look at as does the softness of the while image. Looks like you missed focus as her shoulder is sharper than her face
The fuck is this shit
I can't seem to get these kind of photos right. Can I get some CC /p/?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 6D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:04 17:42:03 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2736091
Not enough fill. Your dark shadows are adding a tone to the image that doesn't match what it seems like you're going for.
Also, ugly face lighting.
>>2736091
Background seems a little weird to me. It's all pink and red hues on the left but then transitions to a faded khaki on the right, with this big old patch of dark on the bottom right. I think if it was uniformly either red/pink it'd work better and be a decent backdrop.
>>2736094
Seeing the image in a smaller size really has highlighted to me how bad the face lighting is, thanks for the direction.
Composition porn.
Hi /p lets see a photo you think has amazing composition. It can be yours, it can be someone elses.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer k Image-Specific Properties:
>fence post is leaning over
>have model lean over onto fence post
C O M P O S I T I O N
but anyways, I really like Arnold Newman a lot.
>>2732383
>>2732384
God-tier cinematography thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 500 Image Height 331 Scene Capture Type Standard
motherfuckin' Benoît Debie
Aces
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D800 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Photographer Chris Large Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 1150 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:03:31 01:04:11 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 2000 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 3000 Image Height 2159 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
Any tips for setting up a business portfolio on Squarespace?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software Shotwell 0.18.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048
>>2736229
i want to hear about encounters and/or experiences you've had whilst out photographing, good and bad.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 83 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2014:09:08 01:15:32 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 4.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
i told a girl on tinder i did headshots so she came over and we fucked and had a little pregnancy scare
The good times have been incredible and the bad times only a bit frustrating.
Best of the good times have probably been getting on stage with some incredible musicians, hanging out back stage with them. Getting into a national broadcasters studios to film musicians perform live, I was shown around Israel by a former paratrooper, he brought me up to the Golan heights and to the border with Lebanon which was all amazing.
The bad stuff? Just getting bitched at really, people at protests venting on me for
>"the lack of press coverage...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2736147
>golan heights
>90% of it is landmines, barbed wire fence, and rusted blown up halftrucks
>areas literally designated "fire zones" a walk away from tourist attractions, where you are in danger of getting fucking shot
cool place
Alrighty, so I'm looking for some cheap ways to get a nice lofi/vhs/whatever the fuck look. I'm looking at some cameras like the Digital Harinezumi for film stuff but want to know what some other alternatives for that kinda look would be. Also, I have a Nikon TeleTouch 300AF that needs a new battery and a Canon A-1 that is damaged in someway that I don't know, so I was wondering if I were to get them operating would they give me the kind of look im going for?
Keep in mind I'm completely new to photography but I've got these cameras and I'm pretty fucking interested in the filming shit so I could really use some help with finding some cheap stuff
>pic related, it's pretty much what I'm going for I guess
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1280 Image Height 922
pls help, im just a poor boy
Sony Handycam TRV130 is a Hi8 camera with a VHS appearance. 140 on Amazon
You're probably better keeping your money, filming on your phone, then using filters. Eg;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDNItuOvpMU
I took two pictures of mountains.
One at f/5, one at f/22.
I thought a smaller aperture was better for landscapes. However, I think the f/5 looks better than the f/22.
Both images:
* ISO-200
* 55mm Focal Length
* 0 exposure bias
* Canon Rebel T5
* EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens
f/5: http://i.imgur.com/gUc14my.jpg
* 1/2000 sec exposure
* tripod, pic taken with timer
f/22: http://i.imgur.com/Pnslfke.jpg
* 1/100 sec exposure
* tripod, pic taken with timer.
I read up on depth of field, and it seems like at this distance it doesn't matter, everything will be "focused" as long as I don't have a foreground subject.
However, I think the f/5 looks better than the f/22 (although I'm not super happy with either picture). The mountains are a bit sharper in the f/5 for example.
Why is this? Is it better to shoot at higher apertures for landscapes if I'm just taking pictures of mountains?
Any other advice/recommendations to make my pictures look better?
I'm a complete beginner, so any advice is appreciated
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T5 Camera Software Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:01:03 15:36:37 Exposure Time 1/2000 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB
the OP image is the f/5 picture, here is the f/22 so you don't have to go to imgur.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T5 Camera Software Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:01:03 15:36:26 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction
When any wave passes through a small hole it gets slightly disorganised on the other side, more so the smaller the hole. This is called diffraction. When you shoot at f/22 your aperture is absolutely tiny and thus diffraction decreases the sharpness of your image by interfering with the light waves.
Most lenses tend to be sharpest around f/8 to f/11. f/22 shouldn't be used unless you really really want a long exposure for some reason and there's too much light around. Also if you shoot at f/22 dust spots on your sensor appear because the depth of field is so...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
