[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 165. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

File: DSC_0261.jpg (2 MB, 2074x1382) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0261.jpg
2 MB,
Was looking through my old photos and found some that kinda intrigued me.

There is obviously a cage on the foreground but it looks like it has been blurred so much that it has become invisible.

What settings would make such an effect show up?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3100
Camera SoftwareVer.1.01
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2013:10:12 11:25:56
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating3200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length300.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2074
Image Height1382
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
3 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: DSC_0265.jpg (2 MB, 2074x1382) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0265.jpg
2 MB, 2074x1382
Here's one with the bars still somewhat visible

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3100
Camera SoftwareVer.1.01
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)277 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2013:10:12 11:28:33
Exposure Time1/640 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length185.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2074
Image Height1382
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>2732246
Wide open aperture for a shallow depth of field.

Need a good lens or else it can get really glowy and undefined.

File: light_000001.gif (3 MB, 480x270) Image search: [Google]
light_000001.gif
3 MB,
Just whipped this together. Got any tips to make these better?

It's OC. Share yours!
3 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
No one has anything to contribute?
>>
>>2732034
why is this as noisy ?

also what's the point

File: 1451364393173-751434213.jpg (2 MB, 3264x1836) Image search: [Google]
1451364393173-751434213.jpg
2 MB,
New to/p/ but my girlfriend just got this camera from her grandmother,and I was wondering if anybody could tell me more about it. What is it, when was it made, etc.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-G900V
Camera SoftwareG900VVRU2BOK3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3264
Image Height1836
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:12:28 22:46:58
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating2000
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness-3.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3264
Image Height1836
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image IDF16QLHF01VB
4 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1451364473132189338716.jpg (1 MB, 3264x1836) Image search: [Google]
1451364473132189338716.jpg
1 MB, 3264x1836


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-G900V
Camera SoftwareG900VVRU2BOK3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3264
Image Height1836
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:12:28 22:48:23
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating1250
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness-2.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3264
Image Height1836
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image IDF16QLHF01VB
>>
Minolta autocord. Looks like the one you have is missing the name plate which flips down over the lightmeter.
>>
>>2731671
Thanks! Looks like a later model from what I can tell

File: canon powershot.jpg (8 KB, 225x225) Image search: [Google]
canon powershot.jpg
8 KB,
Got a new canon powershot sx50 for crimbus, any opinions on the camera from an experienced photographer
4 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2731562
bridge cameras are shit, but if you're good, you can still take okay photos in good light, with a great subject
>>
>>2731562
You will need a bunch of film canisters for it. Also be careful not to expose the mirrors to direct sunlight.
It's an okay camera if you learn to properly use it.
>>
>>2731563
this

waste of money imo OP

File: styles.jpg (81 KB, 620x524) Image search: [Google]
styles.jpg
81 KB,
So I got one of these Konstrucktor DIY film
cameras

Great little build, very excited to use it but I've only ever used a DSLR.

Any advice for a film novice.??


Also anyone have one of these cameras and whats your opinion or share some shots

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2013:06:13 08:44:26
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width620
Image Height524
11 replies and 3 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2731548
I got one for christmas as well
It's a fun little toy

One problem I've had was that the film counter doesn't work properly and it seems to tear the sprocket holes.

Anyways I wouldn't use this for any serious shots, maybe at a party or something. Take fun pictures and then print them out and hand it to people the day after or something.
>>
>>2731548
They're great for decoration. Not for taking pictures. The point of the Konstruktor is to be entertaining when you're building it, not to actually be a functional camera.

Buy a cheap Zenit for $5 and have some fun shooting.
>>
>>2731560

Thats interesting cause my film is winding fine without tearing. Yeah i cant see myself using this over my Nikon

>>2731734
Yeah I couldn't imagine a build your own film camera would come close to a factory built cam. But was fun to build

File: woohoo.jpg (609 KB, 1000x665) Image search: [Google]
woohoo.jpg
609 KB,
Why do we not have recurring technique discussion threads when we have gear threads and recent photo threads?

To start out, I am happy today because I managed to take a photo @ 1/15 shutter speed and 200mm focal length hand-held that wasn't just blurred out. Trying to improve the steadiness of my hand. The lens did have VR, but Nikon's only accounts for 3 stops... so it's way below the recommended minimum for that focal length. I found out that each lens has to be held differently to be stable enough for the VR to make any difference in a situation like that. This opens a door to a whole new realm of practicing my hand.

Now it's your turn. Let's discuss techniques, both for shooting and post-processing.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3200
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern1094
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)300 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6016
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUnknown
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2015:12:28 21:25:24
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceFine Weather
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length200.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height665
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
3 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
a good rule is 1/focal length as your handheld shutter speed )before lens stability comes into play)

so, a 100mm lens should be handheld at 1/100s shutter speed minimum, unless you're pretty steady. This is really helpful.
>>
>>2731238
That is true. What I am practicing now is my ability to take sharp still images below that limit hand-held, mostly without any movement in them. As you said, "unless you're pretty steady"... well, I want to become pretty steady.

I think it's a good kind of self-torture that also benefits me in times when I do have enough light to stay above them. Nothing worse than a shaky photographer.

File: star110.jpg (48 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
star110.jpg
48 KB,
Hi, I was cleaning stuff around the house and I found a Kodak Star 110. I have no idea how it works but I want to know where I can find film for it. Thanks.
4 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
http://shop.lomography.com/en/films/110-film/lomography-b-w-orca-100-iso-110

took 5 seconds to google
>>
>>2731225
/thread
>>
>>2731210

a 110 cam was like the first camera I owned and boy did that camera suck

File: 51gxrogvNKL._SX371_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (39 KB, 373x499) Image search: [Google]
51gxrogvNKL._SX371_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
39 KB,
>mfw i wanted to buy this one because it was pretty cheap
>but didnt because the cover is horrendous

why a cover like that is allowed at all? in a book of art, of all things.
3 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Taschen makes much better photography book mate. Just grab something else.
>>
The autism is strong in this one

File: 120.jpg (2 MB, 2048x1398) Image search: [Google]
120.jpg
2 MB,
Alright, im a 4 year vet who shoots with a 60d, some decent to good glass, i shoot people for newpapers and realty....

I have to over compensate on my 430ex flash with a gary fong diffuser to make up for the poor iso performance....

I need more iso so i can go lighter on the flash...

The 7d mark 2 and the 6d are the same price, Is a full frame sensor able to capture available natural light better then an apc?

I only have one l series lens and a lot of lenses that the 6d cant use so im leaning to the 7d mark 2 right now.... however, if full frame sensors are better and capture more accurately, should i go with a 6d then?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 60D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:12:26 13:33:56
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/9.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Lens Aperturef/9.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length14.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
5 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Capture.png (295 KB, 579x294) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
295 KB, 579x294
>>2730861
how hard is it to look it up yourself?
>>
Obviously the 6d is a better long term investment, significantly better in low light too.
>>
Sounds like you need to get yourself some fast prime glass, or learn to use your flash off camera. ISO performance should be a last resort fix, when comparing to benefits of more/different light setups, or wider apertures.

If you want to buy a new body for low light, then get the 6D. I can shoot mine at 25600 and it looks like a crop camera's 3200. 6400 on the 6D is as usable as 800 on most crop cameras.

File: R0133741 (Custom).jpg (105 KB, 1000x662) Image search: [Google]
R0133741 (Custom).jpg
105 KB,
toast photos in this bread

read the sticky and resize ur shitsnapps

last one >>2725154

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:21 17:44:44
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Brightness3.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
4 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Haven't been here for 5 years. Can't believe this shit is still fucking up p.
>>
File: R0133741 (Custom).jpg (141 KB, 1000x662) Image search: [Google]
R0133741 (Custom).jpg
141 KB, 1000x662
>>2730658
>in p
>in rpt
>has no p

here, have a cropped pp

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:27 16:58:05
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Brightness3.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>2730660
We already have a RPT that's like 150 posts deep. Look before you post tripfag

>>2728886

File: tumblr_nzp5dq77co1rxvaf2o1_540.jpg (82 KB, 540x365) Image search: [Google]
tumblr_nzp5dq77co1rxvaf2o1_540.jpg
82 KB,
how do you do this cold and contrasty-silvery feel in photoshop?

i know this is a vsco preset, but i want to know what goes on behind the scenes, so to say?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone
Camera SoftwareVSCO
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:20 23:10:16
CommentProcessed with VSCOcam with a9 preset
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2560
Image Height1730
Scene Capture TypeStandard
5 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Lower colour temp in w/b
Lower reds in colour mixer
Not being definition of autism
>>
>>2730650
the whites are slightly yellow though...
you dont get that by lowering temp in wb
>>
>>2730648

make the blues cyan. it fixes everything.

File: stupid_genius.jpg (8 KB, 292x266) Image search: [Google]
stupid_genius.jpg
8 KB,
Hi /p/ stupid question incoming:

Is there an adapter to use a micro four thirds lens on an old four thirds body?
5 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Why not google it or ask in the stupid question thread?
>>
>>2730611

This post should help.
>>
>>2730611
you can't adapt a smaller flange back distance to a larger one. at least not without horrible lense lensing.

File: 537c85417c5e133caedf06308adb2e47.jpg (528 KB, 1010x659) Image search: [Google]
537c85417c5e133caedf06308adb2e47.jpg
528 KB,
I want to do a documentary project on industry in my city. How does one get access to the locations and people I need? I feel like I'd just get laughed at if I called up companies asking for access to their plants for a personal photography project. I've thought about just driving down to the industrial area and taking photos from outside/talking to people, but I don't know how well that will work.

Very much inspired by Salgado's Workers and want to do a (much smaller) project in that vein.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHasselblad
Camera ModelHasselblad H3D II-39
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
PhotographerBob Tursack
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3000
Image Height1956
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution100 dpi
Vertical Resolution100 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2012:04:03 00:51:15
Exposure Time372827/33554432 sec
F-Numberf/20.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/20.0
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1010
Image Height659
2 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
How did Salgado get his fucking tones?

To answer your question OP, just ask the construction companies if you can be a visitor to for your "documentary project"

Construction sites get visitors all the time. You'd get a hard hat, you take your pictures, then you leave. nbd. Worst that happens is they say no. They may say no for a variety of reasons. But I doubt you'll get "laughed at" so stop being a scardey cat and just ask!

Or you can walk around and get close to street workers and take pics. Not a big deal. Dress like a tourist....
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: g7leadpanasonic.jpg (64 KB, 630x412) Image search: [Google]
g7leadpanasonic.jpg
64 KB,
Boys, I'm buying a G7. I am going to be doing some video projects next year. Is the 14-42mm kit lens good enough for general tomfoolery until I save up for some GOAT crisp primes?

I mean, even the so-so image of the kit lens will be 10x better than the cheapo camcorder I have now, right?

Or should I get the body only and get a different zoom lens?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePhotos 1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:03:02 15:42:14
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width630
Image Height412
3 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
It's fine yeah, there's no point getting the 14-140 and the only constant aperture zooms are the 12-35 and the 12-40, which, whilst a he'll of a lot better are a fair whack more money
>>
>>2730568
>Is the 14-42mm kit lens good enough for general tomfoolery

Yes it is but don't expect any miracles from it. The 14-42 is a cheap kit lens which can be outperformed quite easily.

be sure to get that ultrasharp 20mm f1.7 pancake lens. It's a beast.

File: phpuamqrk.jpg (149 KB, 970x679) Image search: [Google]
phpuamqrk.jpg
149 KB,
Help me /p/!

So I have been in this huge pickle on what new camera body to get and after watching all the different review videos and comparing specs, I am turning here for help.

So, I shoot a lot of model photography (Mostly in low light scenes) as well as a lot of low light photography overall, so everyone is pointing me to the Sony A7 series of cameras or various Cannon/Nikkon, now I also do a ton of sport video/ short filmaking and I am looking for a camera that does some decent slow motion/low light video as well (4k would be nice to have but not necessary)

So...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
3 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2730458
OP here again, forgot to mention by budget is arround 5000$ (Lenses + Acc Included)
>>
Sony a7rii?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6kSMd78oTU&t=12m27s

Crop mode video is on par with the a7s in low light but only goes up to 25,600 ISO.

banner
banner
Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216]
Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216]
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.