Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 15. page
- Home
- Board: /p/ - Photography
- Reading: Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 15. page
About 3 years ago I bought an Orbis ring flash adapter,. played with it for 20 mins then promptly forgot about it until half an hour ago.
What good are these things, is it purely a fashion photography thing? Can't for the life of me think why I bought it.
Also yes, my penis was too small to stick through.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D4S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 4958 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 26 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:28 16:40:57 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory, Return Not Detected Focal Length 26.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
portraits
>>2872454
except that's clearly done with some weird triangle shaped setup.
>>2872491
it's the same principle of surrounding your subject with light
Ring flash is also pretty good as a fill
Looking for other movies like Love Collage. Or great photography flicks in general.
Post them.
Heroic Purgatory has the greatest photography I've ever seen in a film.
Watch the opening here to see what I mean but I would recommend finding a good download online to watch it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYyyp1ufzAY
>>2872058
This does look quite brilliant. I will indeed find a good copy of this online.
some bernie people gave me shekels and said 'take sum snapp'
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Leica Camera AG Camera Model M8 Digital Camera Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:15 21:23:34 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/3.4 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 2500 Lens Aperture f/3.4 Exposure Bias 0.3 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID 00000000000000000000000000003E20
there's a lot of snapp, so sit back and relax. make some popcorn or soup.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Leica Camera AG Camera Model M8 Digital Camera Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:15 21:23:23 Exposure Time 1/90 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 2500 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0.3 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID 00000000000000000000000000003E18
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Leica Camera AG Camera Model M8 Digital Camera Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:15 21:23:27 Exposure Time 1/90 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 2500 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0.3 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID 00000000000000000000000000003E1A
hahaha people still support that loser?
didn't he back clinton after being butt blasted by the polls?
I've just ordered a new Fuji x100t instead of buying used Leica M9 with Biogon 35/2, how badly I fucked up?
>>2870427
>digital leica
you did fine, get an m6 if you want a leica
the fuji is a great camera
>>2870427
Why would you buy either of those meme cameras? You could've gotten a much more capable camera with your autism bucks. You just dropped over 1k on a shit camera.
>>2870433
accordez l'exemples, please
What would be a more capable camera? Dusty Ricoh GR or maybe some big-ass SLR?
Does /p/ reckon high-end camera phones will overtake DSLRs in the near future?
I had a look at some unedited iPhone 6s shots and tried it myself, and I have to say I was very impressed at what can come out of such a little thing
Probably not even though there's tripod mounts for iphones and that the autofocus is still getting better
>>2867004
Pretty impressive considering the actual size of the camera though
Absolutely disgusting
Because the last one Timed out.
Post your recent photos here.
Criticism welcome.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-G70 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 218 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:06:15 23:28:32 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 109.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 866 Image Height 1152 Exposure Mode Manual Image Quality Unknown White Balance Auto Focus Mode Unknown Spot Mode Unknown Image Stabilizer Mode 1 Macro Mode Normal Shooting Mode Manual Audio No Flash Bias 0.00 EV
Yep, it's a bad photo of a squirrel, alright.
>>2864840
This one better?
I need a guide for basic colour-grading.
I don't knwo when to use colour-zones and when to use color-balance (gammaliftgain)
What do I do if one colour is absolutely dominant in one area, like left or right of the spectrogramm?
Should I always try to get an equal distribution of red-green-blue?
Is there a ressource with different styles/looks when to use them and how to achieve them?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-G70 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.16 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 280 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:06:15 23:29:05 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 140.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1152 Image Height 866 Exposure Mode Manual Image Quality Unknown White Balance Auto Focus Mode Unknown Spot Mode Unknown Image Stabilizer Mode 1 Macro Mode Normal Shooting Mode Manual Audio No Flash Bias 0.00 EV
>>2864841
wrong one...
meant to be this.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:06:16 02:42:07 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software LightZone Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1024 Image Height 820 Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>2872370
This is not even remotely in focus. Your contrast is so fucking high that you've got blown highlights and shadows. You're approaching Kenian levels of saturation. Also, the girl looks nasty with those painted on eyebrows and that horrid eye shadow. Delete this and never look back.
>>2872374
...holy fuck, dude. Whatever sharpening and/or high pass filter shit you did to this turned it into absolute shit. Seriously. I can't even begin to understand what crazy fucking retarded shit you did to this photo to achieve those textures. This honestly looks like it was printed on fucking sand paper.
I mean, I guess at least the girls are smiling.
But for fuck's sake these are terrible.
What's better, rotated crop or rotated?
Personally I prefer the rotated as it's easier on the eye, but it makes the fence look weird.
#1 is rotated, #2 is not, #3 is original aspect ratio with no crop.
#1
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3885 Image Height 2589 Number of Bits Per Component 32, 32, 32 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:29 15:51:59 F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 21.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 562 Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
#2 of 3.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3885 Image Height 2589 Number of Bits Per Component 32, 32, 32 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:29 15:53:40 F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 21.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 562 Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
#3 of 3.
I don't know why but I have my camera set up to shoot at 16:9 but it will still shoot at this instead. Any ideas?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3885 Image Height 2589 Number of Bits Per Component 32, 32, 32 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:29 15:56:34 F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 21.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 666 Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2872278
defiantly the first but they are all hdr scum.
Im not being a dick but when you can try get some ND grad filters it will look much better than hdr
Is there any large, unified resource for learning about photography styles, movements, classics, and masters?
Sort of like wikipedia but if it also included critical analysis of photographers work, rather than just cataloging info about them.
If not, what are some good places to start with, if one is interested in researching?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2009:07:02 11:26:11 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 600 Image Height 910
>>2871782
University (not art school)
>>2871808
There's nobody on the internet that's tried to create a site that analyses famous work and tries to educate people?
who is this cum crevice
>Bill Cunningham, the street-style photographer whose photo essays for The New York Times memorialized trends ranging from fanny packs to Birkin bags, gingham shirts and fluorescent biker shorts, died in New York on Saturday. He was 87.
RIP :(
What camera is he using in the picture?
>>2870173
who cares
>This photo from 1967 shows him with his first camera, a half-frame that cost $35. "I had just the most marvelous time with that camera," he said. "Everybody I saw I was able to record, and that’s what it’s all about."
Shame he died in the closet.
Biggest fag there ever was.
RIP Billy.
Would anyone be interested in a very standard, by the numbers, color correction guide for photoshop? I could also try and make guides for whatever else you guys need in photoshop
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop 7.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2005:10:13 11:28:17 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 750 Image Height 617
>>2868927
yes.
>>2868927
yes OP hurry the fuck up!!!
My bad, forgot to check back in. Ill start the tutorial soon
Is full frame over rated?
Depends what you use it for. I shoot a lot of low light stuff so FF makes sense for me
>>2868262
Compared against the most modern APS-C? Yeah, for the most part, though there are exceptions.
For instance, according to some testing, the XPro2 is only about a half stop behind the A7II at high ISO performance. Though it's nowhere near the A7sII, most full frame isn't either.
If you're not a gearfag, then yes, it's overrated.
Hasselblad is aiming to wipe out the MF competition.
>>2867666
I'd rather use one with a proper viewfinder
>>2867666
I say it takes nice photos, but I'm not sure who this is aimed at.
Has anyone found a habbelsad face on it yet
I need some help, /p/. I don't have a full frame body, I never had. First I state the obvious (because this is what I understand so far), then I ask my question. When you put a full frame lens on an APS-C body, the lens will behave differently because of the sensor size: you have to calculate with a different focal length (lens's focal length x 1.6), and you will get also get a different DOF (eg. you loose the creaminess of the bokeh). The question: since the DOF is ALSO affected on an APS-C, does it mean, that your f-number had to be calculated differently? Does that automatically also mean, that if you shoot with the same lens with same f-number settings, you have to use a lower shutter speed on the APS-C to have the same ammount of light?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop 7.0 Photographer Jerod Foster Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 96 dpi Vertical Resolution 96 dpi Image Created 2014:11:01 14:18:34 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias -1/3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 21.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 900 Image Height 600 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
Exposure values are constant. You're cropping into where the lens is sharpest. Only Canon's APS-C is 1.6. Everyone else is around 1.5x.
>>2867542
The amount of light coming through is the same. f/2.8 has the same exposure value on full frame and aps-c. The depth of field will also stay the same, so long as you don't move your feet. The field of view crops in.
The closer you are to something, the less depth of field you get from the same aperture, meaning the opposite is true. The further away you are, the wider the depth of field.
So if you shoot a 50mm on full frame, and then take that 50mm and put in on APS-C, to get the same framing, you have to step back, which means less depth of field at the same aperture, with the same framing.
There's math to figure it out, but who cares. It's about a stop difference, and that's really all you need to know.
It only really matters to bokeh whores who, for some reason, think that the smaller the depth of field you have, the better your photo will be (???)
>>2867548
the most useful answer I found on the net, thanks. unfortunately there's a (seemingly quite agressive) debate between the Northropes and other photographers about whether you have to multiply the f-number too on APS-C cameras or not.
Seeking suggestions and critiques.
Please CC
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:15 22:22:14 Exposure Time 2.5 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 2 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:15 23:22:01 Exposure Time 2 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 2 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:15 23:34:13 Exposure Time 1.3 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 2 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:06:16 00:38:42 Exposure Time 1/4 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
