Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 126. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Hi 4chan !
Can you give me your opinion of that picture ?
Thank you !
ps : this is not the light of a car , but of the city
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 854 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 57 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:02:03 12:55:37 Exposure Time 4 sec F-Number f/4.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/4.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 38.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 5747 Image Height 4000 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
Get off the road before you get knocked down!
only if you resize
>>2759476
Delete this.
Post again at 1000x666
Why aren't you selling photos of potatoes /p/? Don't you want to make millions of dollars?
>>2759333
I'm honestly shocked. That's an amazing photo of a potato. DAT lighting
>>2759333
it looks like a hairy rock in the asteroid belt
>>2759399
Fun fact: in the original star wars scene where Han loses the empire ships that are chasing him by flying into the asteroid belt, they used a potato as one of the asteroids when shooting.
Also used a shoe.
This is may be regarded as a gear thread, although I see it as slightly more technical in nature: I've been using a canon 5D mk3 w/ MP-E 65mm in my setup and was wondering about trying the S or S-R, however I can't establish whether moire will be an issue as I couldn't find anyone on the other forums whose used either for insects. Does anyone have experience with the S-R?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3744 Image Height 5616 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:08 09:10:39 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1722 Image Height 1221
>>2763102
Can you rent?
>>2763106
unfortunately not where I live
>>2763102
I'm using a 5Dii and the mp-e 65mm. I've been looking at this as well and have been considering renting a 5Dsr to see if there is a serious issue with moire. If I recall correctly the fellows over at lensrentals (the kings of gear nerds) seem to think it won't be an issue. The real question is what does the MP-e resolve detail at. Yes you will end up with larger files to print from but with only marginally better detail if mpe doesnt resolve detail to that resolution. I suspect that it doesn't but this is just a gut feeling after having used the lens for so long. I also may be talking a bit out of my ass. Gearfagging isn't a specialty for me.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh) Photographer Reagan Davis Pufall Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:05:16 16:16:16 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 65.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 900 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
Hello all.
I like the way film looks in comparison to the way digital photos look. I would like to buy a decent SLR. However, I know nothing about film, cameras, lenses, or brands.
Can you guys help me out please? I don't want to use disposable cameras.
- Removable lenses
- SLR
- Not too expensive
- Good quality
- Reliable
- Things to watch out for, things to know.
- Film, what to know, where to buy.
Okay, thanks for any information you can give me, /p.
>>2762118
I like olympus slr's because theyre small and the lenses are great for nice price. But i recommend just looking for a camera in a thrift store.
>>2762118
> I like the way film looks in comparison to the way digital photos look
Cheaper option: Apply software filter to your digital photo in post.
Film looks without all the expenses.
Old mechanical SLRs aren't differentiated in the way modern cameras are. Pentax, Mamiya, Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Minolta and even cheap shit like Chinon and Praktica are all pretty much the same and the 50mm 1.7~2 kit lenses are all great. The electronic ones (aside from a basic meter) are more differentiated but also generally lower quality and more likely to be broken.
I need help /p/ I my house got robbed recently and all I got were these shitty videos from the neighbors camera. Is there a way to get a cheaper image or maybe some sci Fi csi shit to zoom in and get a license plate?
More
Another
lol, thanks for laughs op.
ITT: Cine film
Anyone uses Cinestill, or Vision 2/3?
Anyone washes their own Vision film for shots? Before or after? ...Ive used some pre washed V3 (water+baking soda), looked like shit. Then shot V3 washed post-shot, and it looked decent when scanned, but still too yellow greenish, too lomoish.
Any other method besides water+baking soda wash for the remjet?
Pic is from somewhere else. Cinestill 800 i think.
>>2759453
from http://filmphotographyproject.com/store/135-cinema-film-fpp-kodak-vision-250d-1-roll
>1. When pouring your chemistry back into your containers, please use a coffee filter in your funnel to capture any "rem jet" waste. This will keep your chemistry clean for re-use!
>2. After your Blix, rinse your film in a half bucket of hot water (80 - 102 degrees F) with a few table spoons of Baking Soda. With your thumb, gently rub the non-emulsion side of your film as you remove it from your film reel. Careful not to scratch the emulsion of your film. Final rinse under running water before submerging your film into the two-minute Stabilizer. You will see the black rem jet in your water as you rinse.
that or just shoot cinestill, not that much more expensive. or just be a normal person and shoot ektar or portra, they use vision 3 technology so don't vary much apart from color balance/speed
>>2759456
>or just be a normal person and shoot ektar or portra
i dont wanna be normal. i have a brand new 400ft metal canister full of V2 200T waiting to be shot.
>>2759453
I use Cinestill 50D. It's currently my favorite general-purpose color neg film, but the slow speed is a bitch when I'm not outside. I wish they spooled 250D into canisters too, I would buy that in a heartbeat. 800T has horrible, ugly grain that I can't get into.
I would never even consider removing the rem-jet layer myself.
OP, have you ever shot any Vision 2383? It's really slow but it doesn't have a remjet layer. Seems like it would be interesting.
But, im a poorfag and need a solid camera for under 200€ (250$) can anyone recommend me some good ones?
Canon - PowerShot ELPH 160
20.0-Megapixel camera that's good on your budget. You can then get a good memory card and a case for it
Nikon - Coolpix L840
A camera right on your budget with some wiggle room to get accessories. This camera is able to compete with most professional MFT cameras that cost 4 times as much. (pricier alternative Canon - PowerShot SX530)
>>2762865
In addition: Nikon - Coolpix S9900
Comparable to the Ricoh GR which costs three times as much. This comes with a tilt/flip screen and preforms amazing under low light. Good manual controls and very pocketable for it's 30x zoom range.
>>2762862
Always look for second hand, take a friend with you who knows cameras. Ask for a recent unedited photo of any prospective SLR to get an idea of shutter count (you can upload this photo online; there are free tools to work it out).
I got my first D70 and 50 1.8 for $200AUD $150ish USD second hand. There was some haggling but I always loved that camera.
Personally I would prefer a 10 year old SLR to most modern point and shoots. I prefer the ergonomics (and now I have plenty of glass for 'em too)....
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
![120145[2].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Ryl0YGz.jpg "120145[2].jpg")
Has anyone here used this brand of film, particularly its 4x5 CHS 100 line? I'm thinking of trying it out but I want to see what other people have to say about it.
Lets talk Snow!
Ive seen lots of bickering back and forth about which tones snow should be and how you should post processing on it.
lets share experiences and techniques. I can provide some raw files, but theyre only olympus and shot through a train window, so if anyone want to share some of theirs, feel free.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rem9ilg8w0u3ojx/P1200215.ORF?dl=0
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh) Photographer Daniel R. E. Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 70 dpi Vertical Resolution 70 dpi Image Created 2016:02:07 12:54:26 Exposure Time 1/1600 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 45.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2762806
i dont understand whats happening with the resolution
this is the jpeg from the raw file
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh) Photographer Daniel R. E. Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Color Filter Array Pattern 854 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 100 dpi Vertical Resolution 100 dpi Image Created 2016:01:24 22:05:03 Exposure Time 1/1250 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Shade Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 45.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
new to photography
do I hit order??
Sure, it's only 500 bucks.
>>2762364
Is this a good camera? is there a good alternative to pelican cases?
>>2762368
A strap.
So I got a box of cameras from someones attic. Crap mostly. I was hopeful for the Kodamatic, and it DOES work, but the film expired in '85 and is practically useless. The Canonet seems like a good camera in general but the shutter and the aperature blades are completely stuck. The rest is some agfa stuff either not working or using 126 film. So the only camera that actually (mostly) works is a Porst FX 4 with a Meyer Görlitz Domiplan 50mm f2.8. I'm kinda disappointed because I'd been waiting for that particular box for months and now it's really not of much use/beyond repair/LQ.
I'll post some test shots I did with the Porst on HP5 anyway. Maybe I can at least kill a gearfag thread with this and all of my anticipation will not have been for naught.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>2760600
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>2760601
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>2760603
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
Anyone have a cool profile? Looking for new places to see or artwork in general. Artwork is mine.
IG: Hi my name is chef
>>2762644
If only there was already a thread for this
Just saw it, never mind.
![Samsung-NX1-vs.-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GH4-1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/f6KoWll.jpg "Samsung-NX1-vs.-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GH4-1[1].jpg")
Guys I have to decide what camera to buy from this two models of choice.
They both are excellent to me but I can't really decide...I'd buy the Sammy but it uses only NX lenses, on other hand the Panasonic has much much more choice.
Destination of use: stills photos, animals and landscapes, also videos at amateur level (nothing serious).
>>>Gear thread
:)
>>2762077
Sorry, I'm an idiot.
Posting there.
I'm thinking about getting a scanner so I can.. scan (obviously) negatives.
I'm on a bit of a tight budget, and I'm wondering what in specific I should look for. Will a regular old scanner do the job?
How about printing?
>>2761376
>Will a regular old scanner do the job?
No, not for negatives. You need one with a light in the lid that will shine through the negative to the scanner sensor.
If you're on a budget, check out a V500 for medium format, or a Plustek 8100 for 35mm.
>>2761386
Brilliant, thank you!
I should have said it is 35mm I'd be scanning in the original post.
>>2761386
Is there any reason to get a V500 over a V550? I notice that the V500 seems to be discontinued and costs more than the V550, which I could go get from Fry's right now if I wanted to.
>have decent photo op
>completely ruin it with shitty HDR
what did they mean by this?
>>2761118
Process your pics however you want.
>>2761118
the flowers are a little too bright, but it's not too awful as far as hdr goes.
I bet it would sell a lot of prints though.
>>2761118
It ain't bad, the colours are a bit too intense I think but hey, some people like that, and there is some weird "haze" over the trees caused by the HDR process
But I really think that an HDR would be the way to go to take this picture on a mid-range DSLR
