Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 135. page
- Home
- Board: /p/ - Photography
- Reading: Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 135. page
Why have camera producers stopped creating colour cameras?
Remember the end of the film era - Champagne finish Canon, pentax, Nikon, mf Fuji or grey Minolta. Yes, the quality was low, but back then most of the cams were plastic. Nowadays we have all those alloy bodies which in theory could be easily painted in any colour you like. Yes, pentax does it now, but you probably would get tired of their Lego colors too fast.
Why can't we get a higher class dslr in color? Or even mirrorless if we think of sony. I'm talking of something of at least 6d/5d level.
I'll post some more pics related to the topic
I wish sony would make a golden a7
How do you achieve this look?
He is Takashi Yasui
https://500px.com/_tuck4 take a look to understand what I'm asking
>>2755877
Most important step - Gorgeous soft light and a low contrast simple-color scene
Then, add lots of contrast in post
Then, raise the black point a bit.
>>2755877
1) Go to Japan.
2) Live in Japan.
3) Shoot full frame.
4) Apply VSCO generously.
>>2755881
lol
Really is it just a bunch of presets?
How can I do it "manually"
old one almost 3hunna / #keepitonefifty / limit reached >>>>2755096
Fuck being polite - post images.
Mom's getting old.
Feels bad man.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 6 Plus Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 Windows Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 29 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016-01-31T19:36:59+01:00 Exposure Time 1/35 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 32 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 3.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.15 mm Image Width 1040 Image Height 790 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual
feedback, one of my first edited pics
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties:
Still learning to use my camera. Help.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software Ver.1.04 Photographer Picasa Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.9 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 36 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 160 Image Height 120 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:31 20:46:55 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 1.7 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 24.00 mm Image Width 665 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown Unique Image ID 0525fbf6408b6b89b01608b574d2189d ISO Speed Used 100 Image Quality RAW White Balance AUTO Focus Mode MANUAL Flash Compensation 0.0 EV ISO Speed Requested 100 Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV Lens Type Unknown Lens Range 18.0 - 55.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 513
I'm curious about what it is you gain in your artistry (if not artistry and/or taste itself, in case you didn't have it from the beginning) by attending a (prestigious) photography school. What do they teach you that you can't teach yourself? Is it the atmosphere and the environment that develops your creativity and artistry? Is it the fact that you're granted a lot of resources to do whatever you want, because you're a photography student on paper? I really want to know, since you can read about composition yourself, you can get mileage yourself, but there always seems that there is this little piece of something that is unattainable as "self--taught".
I am limited by time, space and money. Sometimes it's extremely frustrating because I try my best to develop myself outside of these constrictions, regardless of the fact that I'll not be able to learn or do some things for a good while yet.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 525 Image Height 422 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2757148
You get to learn directly from talented professionals. If you don't have 'it' this doesn't mean shit, you'll still be a crap photographer. If you do, it'll just progress you farther and wider.
Most famous art photographers are self taught or worked in the industry (assistant, second etc). Photography schools are a new thing, relatively speaking.
If you're a talented artist, you don't need school to make you good, but it can help you on your way to being great.
>>2757148
sometimes seeing some faggot one up yourself in a week term project is very good for forcing you into creativity and into finally get better. good motivation. competition does nice things to people.
i havent ever attended photo school, but ive been selected to participate in workshops with artists and art curators and its a comforting thing to beat up artists in their own field with your self taught abilities.
>>2757149
>>2757153
Thank you, solid replies. I sometimes pretend I have a deadline and need to be better than this or this person I've discovered. I can totally see why it works wonders. I'm alone with photographing among people I know and in my town (I live in Sweden). In october I entered a small local competition but got nothing, some 14-year-old took a generic picture of a labrador and won a set of studio equipment worth ~500$. Photography for me has always been a very lonely and immersive thing and I feel it has to change at some point if I want to develop.
As mentioned I just got my first camera an EOS Rebel T5 Canon with a 18-55mm lens.
Obviously as a beginner I know jack shit about cameras and the magic they can really do.
All in all how good is this camera for a beginner and which other options could I have looked in to? Oh yeah, I got it for $400.oo
>>2758297
It's very good for an absolute beginner.
>>2758297
itll do far more than what youll ever be able to ask it to do. its very capable. dont spiral into some stupid buyers remorse, because it aint do you any good.
start taking pictures already.
I'll post some I recently took on a hike! And please review! I'd like to take this seriously as a hobby.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T5 Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.1 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:01:14 17:36:27 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Landscape Mode Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3456 Image Height 2304 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative ISO Speed Rating Auto Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Landscape Image Size Medium Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 135
Ctrl+f'd for cinema/cinematography, found nothing so I gotta open a thread:
I've just seen Hateful Eight in 70mm, the full 187 minutes, and I was BTFO'd by the photography. Go fucking see it. That's all.
People who've seen it in 70, were you blown away too or I'm just easily impressed? I absolutely loved the format, I almost cried like a little girl.
And yeah, the movie was pure, unadulterated Tarantino, and I loved every second of it, but that's for another board.
Also
>all screenshots floating on the web are either obscene dogshit quality or high res but cropped so they're nearly square
travesty
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 144 dpi Vertical Resolution 144 dpi Image Width 3360 Image Height 1236
>>2757494
did they had that kind of yellow and that kind of rubbery texture back then?
it was cool, my neck hurt after the movie though
Can anyone objectively define composition, and more importantly, good composition?
Subjective evaluations and opinions hold no meaning or merit.
>>2756877
The arrangement of items and form in the scene.
Good composition balances the scene's visual weight, as well as uses light, color, texture, form, and lines to guide the viewer around the image.
>>2756882
>visual weight
but what does this mean
>>2756885
In your OP image, for instance, the hair, jacket collar, and mouth-area are all "visually heavy". They anchor the image, and draw your eye. The hair is heavy top and right, so having the mouth left, and the collar bottom right help to balance it. This image is doing well in terms of balancing the visual weight.
i'd rather take /p/'s abuse than do my homework, so i'm posting a thread for once
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>2756161
semester just started and you already slacking
get yo ass in that school book
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
The case for the Ricoh Theta.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1171904-REG/ricoh_910717_theta_hardcase_th_1.html
Oh, that's getting inserted.
It's even water resistant.
>>2755618
"Enjoy a new world of images you have never experienced before."
went for a walk today, took some photos
all critique very welcome, I realize I'm still a noob, but I'm trying
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3115 Image Height 2592 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:28 14:22:50 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 832 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3730 Image Height 2374 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:28 14:23:04 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 636 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3888 Image Height 2592 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:28 14:23:17 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3852 Image Height 2592 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:28 14:23:28 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 673 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
Why did nobody ever tell me that I can do this with my wide angle lens? This is a thread for wide angle macro photography, or using a wide angle lens to take close up photos of objects.
Does anyone here take a lot of wide angle close up photography? What can you tell me about your experience doing this? Any tips for choosing or orienting a good subject? Do you use a shallower depth of field, deeper depth of field? Post your best wide angle macro photos.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software PENTAX K-3 Ver. 1.11 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 21 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:27 23:11:14 Exposure Time 4 sec F-Number f/18.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 14.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1280 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Macro
>>2754989
Here's a shit pic I took with a friend's fish eye a while back. I never edited it but I did a quick 30 second edit.
It's pretty crazy how close some wide angles can focus. I remember this 8mm lens could focus all the way up to something touching the lens, and then a bit more.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:28 00:09:04 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 8.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2754989
This is really popular actually, it's called porn
My 8mm can focus on things touching the elements, was messing around on my bed with it and at f/22, and the blanket touching the lens was in acceptable focus. No pics on my harddrive of it unfortunately.
What happened to that faggot who was talking about a photobook?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448
>>2753604
what happened to the /p/ book? I've been gone a few days
>>2753609
This is what Im talking about, faggot collected a bunch of pictures and vanished.
Let me hear what will make this (and any other pics annons wish to post here) a better photo. What do you like and what do you not?
Make it level, fix your black-point, make it sharper.
>>2752578
i fucking love that image. its perfect. i live in a shitty city that blows horse cocks. id kill to be there in that morning mist in a comfy cabin.
>>2752578
Also, no subject.
Is this the only reason uncle terry is famous?
>>2750333
Nice trips. I've rarely see him outside of these walls.
>>2750338
He takes photos with some of the most famous celebrities, he must be known to other people too
>>2750333
>father, famous fashion photographer
>Is this the only reason uncle terry is famous
/thread
What is the correct aspect ratio for photography?
>>2757191
8x10 is the patrice ratio. runner up are 6x7 and 1:1. everything else is pleb as fuck.
>>2757194
>aspect ratios not even close to the aspect ratio of the human eye
for what purpose
>>2757191
""""""correct""""""
