Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 132. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
What are some good pics to practice clone stamping and colour correction on?
Pic related. There was an old man in the foreground and the colours were a bit washed before.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:24 20:48:47 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 768
Basically any photo. On this one, remove all people and buildings.
I download my friends bad Facebook photos and color correct them.
>>2752825
Done
Also i'm not OP and i have no idea what im doing
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:25 19:27:47 Color Space Information sRGB
>>2753308
Not too bad. If you zoom all the way in & know what to look for you could tell stuff had been cloned. Kind of above the girl's head you can tell that the line of the sand isn't followed.
Keep on working at it!
Recent photo thread.
>>2757369 nearing 300.
Please remember to try and give thoughtful judgement and critique to the poster.
Thoughts on this?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-510 Camera Software VSCO Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 220 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition RGB Horizontal Resolution 314 dpi Vertical Resolution 314 dpi Image Created 2015:09:11 01:01:41 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/5.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 110.00 mm Comment Processed with VSCOcam with m5 preset Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 612 Image Height 816 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Soft
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:02 00:48:46 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 985
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:02 00:52:42 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1015 Image Height 1000
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:02 00:53:29 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1015 Image Height 1000
I'm looking for a slim everyday "man bag" that I can also use to carry an a7s+lens and maybe another prime, nothing more,
Priority is small size, easy fast and kinda stealth access (fuck velcro) while still being relatively safe when closed and a look that doesn't scream "camera bag". Don't care about water-proof materials, not in my country.
I saw a shitload of bags on amazon but they're all like this:
a: big camera bags, they all obviously have "I have a camera inside, pls steal it" written on them. I may...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Also I fucked up the subject. Anyway this is the other bag, maybe the 100 version, smaller than the 150, is better for me.
Check out the Ona Bowery, looks a tad gay but it's really small while still having enough room for a camera and a couple of lenses.
>>2756738
>Ona Bowery
Yeah it looks less gay depending on the colour, I like it. Problem is it's definitely out of my budget, the bags I posted cost less than 50$.
I want to start taking photos with something that's not my phone, but I want it to be something that's easy to carry around.
I can't stop hearing about the Ricoh GR here. Do I take the plunge with this, or do I look into the Fujifilm X100S/T?
Which would you recommend for a beginner who doesn't want a DSLR and is probably not going to upgrade this camera for a while.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2753880
gear thread you fucking cuck.
>>2753880
Get a fucking DSRL or keep using your phone.
the Ricoh doesn't even have a view finder.
also, gear thread.
>>2753884
>the Ricoh doesn't even have a view finder.
OH NO!
anyone mess with these types of lenses? they look interesting but are they worth getting
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2005:02:10 21:59:13 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 400 Image Height 334
>>2752397
Ask Eggy, he has a bunch
>>2752397
i audibly said WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT when i saw this image
seriously
what the fuck am i looking at?
>>2752445
A camera with a catadioptric lens.
/p/ is Facebook trier when it comes it criticism, but instead of a Like you'll get "your shit sucks" or "kill yourself". While both of these answers are valid for most of the pictures posted on here, because your pictures are Facebook trier as well, they don't really help the photographer improve.
We've had critique threads in the past and they didn't really work out as well, everybody just posted their stuff and very few people actually left a critique. Let's try something new:
I'll take my time to leave you an in depth critique of your work. I'll analyze the technical aspects as well as the picture language. I'll try my best to help you improve and become a better photographer if you follow my simple rules:
>board rules apply
I won't critique at any needlessly large pictures
>no snapshits
I won't critique your holiday pictures or similar stuff, chose a picture you think is worth it
>tell me about your picture
What was your intention of doing it, what did you try to convey? I'll spend my time with your work, so I'm expecting you to help me understand your point of view. A little background is enough, you don't need to write an essay.
That's it. If any of you would like to join in and start a discussion I'd appreciate it. Let's talk about pictures on here for once.
>picture sauce: Karl Peters, Otto Steinert bei der Korrektur, 1965
In case anyone is interested.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:20 11:21:52 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 800
