Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 125. page

I like the colors. I wish there wasn't that shadow creeping up on the left hand side, as it seems out of place.

I would have moved to the left in order to position the tower in-between the two buildings in the background, right now it's obscuring half of the one on the left which looks odd.

>>2762612
Yeah, I was kind of focused on trying to get the moon and the building on the right in good spots.

>>2762613
I don't think the moon really adds anything to it, to be honest.

>>2761838
not real, dumbass

>>2761850

But it is.

>>2761854
What world?

>>2761018
how bad is it?
I have a zorki where the vertical is off just very slightly and it's still perfectly usable. To calibrate the vertical on a zorki you need to take the top plates off and then adjust screws inside the camera.

Search flickr to figure out how to do this, i'm not sure.

if you don't have to do it, don't.

>>2761056
Its only the vertical and its not too bad so I can focus still, but its not easy.
From what I've read you need to take off a bezel off but I'm not sure if it's the front circle window or the viewfinder bezel.
Also I have no clue what to do after I take off the correct bezel.

>>2761056
>if you don't have to do it, don't.
probably the best idea, but I've heard its easy to do.

File: DSC02321[1] - Copy.jpg (5MB, 3630x5414px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

5MB, 3630x5414px

Opinion on this? Apart from noise?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>2750398
>>2751602
They're both terrible, do these photos look attractive to you? I just don't know why you'd bother

>>2751606
Appreciate the honesty. Although i'm more interested in why they're terrible. Thanks though.

I just bought a used X100S with a shutter count of 3.5K, did I get really lucky?

>>2760777
Why would that be lucky? What did you pay for it?

>>2760777

Depends on the price.

Seems to be the story for the X100 line, though. I got mine with about the same number of shots run through it. Dudes buy it thinking they're going to be the next HCB and then never use it.

File: Re- Atheist Wisdom - A Nod.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

9KB, 480x360px

>>2763382
I absolutely agree with your opinion my good sir

>>2763382
>>2763422
In this moment, I am euphoric. not because of any phony building's structure, but because I am enlightened by the sun's reflection.

yes buy it and fuck off

yes buy it and fuck off

>>2762669
>>2763534
Great thanks

File: kittycat.jpg (2MB, 1235x1500px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

2MB, 1235x1500px

I've had a disk crash, so don't have access to all my stuff atm, and have some stuff to scan, so I'll repost a few pics to start off with.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	360 dpi
Vertical Resolution	360 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:09 16:23:54

File: pony.jpg (324KB, 1280x835px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

324KB, 1280x835px

Godspeed

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	360 dpi
Vertical Resolution	360 dpi
Image Created	2015:07:16 17:21:24

>>2758755
>>2758753
>>2758752
You're an awful trip.
Why the fuck would you use the same OP image that we've been looking at for the last month?
Delete this thread and kill yourself.

File: leghettofaec.png (68KB, 800x526px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

68KB, 800x526px

>>2763413
Now go click some pictures

>>2763413
Any working camera you get for $15 is a deal

>>2763413
>flash on the grip side
Enjoy your burn.

D750 is a better performing camera in pretty much every respect. Df has interesting ergo's and an interesting look to it.

Performance is still great in both, so it's 100% up to you how much you value those ergo's / aesthetic versus marginal performance increases.

If I was getting one for professional use, D750 no question. If I was getting one for everyday use, Df no question.

At the level you're asking about, it really comes down to which camera physically appeals more to you.

Do you like the modern plastic fantastic body style? 750.

Do you like retro 60's body style? Df.

They're both full frame, both have excellent sensors, both well built, etc, etc. It really doesn't matter.

>>2762083
take some photos faggot. fuck you

File: Independence_California.jpg (61KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

61KB, 480x640px

>>2763342

> I want to get into an extremely competitive field of an extremely competitive industry
> I lack the ability to google shit and find out basic information on my own
Good luck with your dreams, Anon. When you get your first shoot check back and we'll let you know what shutter speed and aperture you should use for every shot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	CYBERSHOT
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2003:03:26 05:56:10
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	6.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	480
Image Height	640

Anyone?

>>2761341
Clubs like photographers. I have friends that do it.

The clubs pay them to take pictures of people either inside or outside of the club to make them feel like celebrities (some of them have like a backdrop thingy) and also to promote the club (people tag themselves in the pictures, their friends see them having fun).

Specific artists and DJ's also employ photographers to go on tour with them.

I'm not sure you make good money doing this so I can't say how this guy is able to make a career out of it, although, many people in the arts are simply trust fund kids so I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case.

>>2761808
>>2761808


thanks.

That said LSP is one of the most famous ones for being one of the first to do this(along with cobrasnake) he doesn't even do club shoots anymore much so I have no idea where he gets his income

I'm not going to college. What's an argument paper? Do you have an argument? What's your argument? What do you mean by "discussing the ethical factors in photojournalism"?

>>2763295
There seems to be a few topics within photojournalism where the question can be asked, "Are some the actions photojournalists take ethical?"

Some examples from the Wikipedia article:

"Photojournalism works within the same ethical approaches to objectivity that are applied by other journalists. What to shoot, how to frame and how to edit are constant considerations. Photographing news for an assignment is one of the most ethical problems photographers face. Photojournalists have a moral responsibility to decide what pictures to take, what picture to stage, and what pictures to show the public."

"Photographs of the dead or injured arouse controversy because more often than not, the name of person depicted in the photograph is not given in the caption. The family of the person is often not informed of the photograph until they see it published. The photograph of the street execution of a suspected Viet Cong soldier during the Vietnam War provoked a lot of interest because it captured the exact moment of death. The family of the victim was also not informed that the picture would run publicly."

"Other issues involving photojournalism include the right to privacy and the compensation of the news subject. Especially regarding pictures of violence, photojournalists face the ethical dilemma of whether or not to publish images of the victims. The victim's right to privacy is sometimes not addressed or the picture is printed without their knowledge or consent. The compensation of the subject is another issue. Subjects often want to be paid in order for the picture to be published, especially if the picture is of a controversial subject."

"Another major issue of photojournalism is photo manipulation – what degree is acceptable? Some pictures are simply manipulated for color enhancement, whereas others are manipulated to the extent where people are edited in or out of the picture."

>>2763298
So is your paper going to be about those particular controversial subjects or is it about you taking a side in them and explaining why?

Its a great camera. Just be sure you do your research first know its downfalls and if it meets your requirements for shooting. I have one and love it just make sure its what you need in a camera

Yes.

I owned the original GR and liked it far more than the X100S I also had at the time. It's mind-bogglingly good for its size.

I'm now using a GR II as a lightmeter for my Hasselblad.

>>2762731
I mean if it fits your needs.

A good camera doesn't make good photos, you make good photos with the aid of a camera.

But it is a good camera if you're looking for something pocketable without sacrificing quality

Depends on the scale of the film, you should be able to cover most of it with your gear, but you may want another person doing cinematography, reshooting scenes at other angles can be a pain

>>2762593
Lighting.

A prime lens with de-clicked aperture would probably help, but you don't NEED it.

>>2762596
That's the thing. I'm scared of letting someone else to the camera work because they way I see things in my head, I want the shot to be exactly that. I don't feel comfortable letting someone else decide the shot.