Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 110. page
- Home
- Board: /p/ - Photography
- Reading: Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 110. page
Anyone have pictures that will make us say to ourselves 20 years later where have we gone
Has anyone ever gone as far?
fuck zuck is that with a hashtag?
>>2775323
>tfw u ask /p/ to write ur buzzfeed article 4 u but dey kno
I'v just found an old Lomo LC-A camera. Do you have any advices/tips/tricks/etc, or web pages how to use it in a nice way? (yup, heard about lomography.com)
>>2774627
Sell it to a hipster and put the money towards a better rangefinder with a sharper lens and less vignetting.
>>2774627
Take pictures with it or sell it to some trust fund kid at 2x the price.
>>2774646
this.
/thread
Tldr; I need to take pictures to emphasize whites. My class is a B&W Film class. Can i get some good ideas or inspirations? Please!
>>2775249
Read. The. Fucking. Sticky.
No. The whole point of an assignment is that you build the skills and do it yourself. If you get some other people to come up with ideas for you you're cheating yourself out of the learning process and you'll end up with gaps that are a pain in the arse to fill later.
Good luck with your assignment though, if you try hard I'm sure you'll come up with something.
>>2775249
>dat pleb tier printer gamut
How are you supposed to learn from that?
I need your opinion on which lens I should keep.
What does /p/ think.
Is the Sony F4 70-200 better than my Sony 24-240 3.5-6.3 FE
Currently auctioning my 24-240 FE Sony lens.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make samsung Camera Model SM-G920T1 Camera Software G920T1UVU2COFB Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.9 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:21 17:36:51 Exposure Time 1/103 sec F-Number f/1.9 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 40 Lens Aperture f/1.9 Brightness 4.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash Flash Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID A16LLIC08SM A16LLIE11GM_
In the same situation as OP, can't seem to decide. Any input?
>
Anyways, your judgement is correct.
>>2774666
>F4
Don't bother. Get a Tamron 70-200 F2.8
I saw a few mentions of greentoe on various photo forums and very few user reviews. does anyone have experience negotiating for equipment through the site?
>>2774102
They are a service.
They have to make money, which means that is some you don't.
>>2774104
looks like it. I submitted an offer roughly 80% of retail, my guess is I'll be hearing back from somebody shortly
>>2774106
seems like it. I'm curious to see wha tthe counteroffer will be as authorized retailers are forbidden from selling below the advertised price
They are legit. Check out photography-on-the.net . Thread in there has over 90 pages about them.
How can I obtain radial bokeh? Is it a certain type of lens?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 276 Image Height 183 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2774433 Vintage lens. Helios 44 and many others.
Helios 77m-4
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:07:18 19:58:30 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/1.4 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/1.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
helios 44-2 is well known for it
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Hey /p/
I have a sort of photo theory question for you fine folks.
Now I know that focal length and distance can affect the look of a photo. Taking photo X, then taking photo Y twice as far away but zoomed in 2 times will show different behavior between subject and background.
But I'm wondering if crop conversion make a difference at all. I have a full frame camera and an APS-C camera, so 1.6x conversion. If I took a prime lens, let's say 50mm, and
took one photo with the APS-Camera, so 80mm equiv shot, then took a shot at the same spot with a full frame camera, but then crop it so it's zoomed to 1.6x, would the photos look different, or would they look the same? Maybe the focal lengths described are too short to make a considerable difference, but it's just something I've been wondering. If I wanted to achieve the most shallow depth of field I can, I'm wondering if popping the lens on a crop camera and increasing the effective focal length would make a difference between subject/background, or if the only difference is maybe the image resolution since you'd be cutting down the full frame picture to get the same framing.
Other than different depths of field the images will look exactly the same. The only thing that affects the compression between foreground/background is how far away you are from the subject, as long as you are in the same position and use the same field of view it doesn't matter what format and focal length you use.
So would the depth of field of a 50mm on a crop sensor be shallower than a 50mm on a full frame then digitally cropped?
>>2774711
Everything you need to know is in this shot.
left is full frame, right is aps-c.
For me personally, it's hard to focus on the eyes when doing portraits or when photographing other things, where you have to work precisely. Therefore I often don't use the viewfinder and use the live view by zooming in.
How did you get yourself to do perfectly focused photos? Is it just practice? Is anyone else using the live view instead of the viewfinder sometimes?
Live view, Focus Confirm
Practice and getting good in estimating distances
>>2774348
split prism focusing screen (film) or focus peaking (digital)
Old photo thread?
anywhere between 1980 and 2007 is welcome
>>2769797
shithole countries also welcome as it's still 2005 there
>>2769797
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2005:03:31 20:14:05 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/22.0 ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 533
I currently use a Cannon 5D Mark 2
Can you fellow /p/ broes recommended the best Lens for wide angle shots for shooting Real Estate / Houses ETC.
Thanks!
>>2773736
>The best
TSE 17mm or 24mm or w/e
Thanks how do you feel about the black magic camera since the lenses are interchangeable ?
TY
>>2773736
>Canon 11-24mm f/4 L
>Canon 16-35 f/2.8 L
>Nikon 14-24mm f2.8 G ED
>Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR
Or sell it to get an Apsc
>Nikon 10-24mm DX
>Canon 10-22mm EF-S
I'm photography noobie with little to no theoretical and practical training. Last year I had to take picture of still life for class at my uni (I study architecture so not all that related). I've made two versions of said photo (got decent grade for it) with the same idea and I'm about to re-purpose it now. I'm however unsure if version #1 or #2 is better, so I hope you guys could give me some critique and help chose the one that's less-shitty. Here we go.
Photo number 1 attached to this post.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4384 Image Height 2922 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:22 03:11:59 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4384 Image Height 2922
And the other one. Help greatly appreciated. Than you.
Photo number 2 attached to this post.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4143 Image Height 2762 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:22 03:12:12 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4143 Image Height 2762
posting some more photos I've done to keep the thread alive until I get replies, consider this just unrelated to my question form of entertainment; as I said I don't know jack shit about photography so please don't feel insulted by my works
Magic of photoshop right there, hope you don't mind. It was taken and edited in huge rush so I wan't able to achieve desired result by other means sadly
So I am looking for some constructive criticism. Photography is new to me but I've been into craft beer for a long time. I decided to start photographing my beer. I'm going to post a few of my shots, some have just a bit of editing using snapseed. I'm shooting with a Nikon D3300 with a kit 55mm lense.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Snapseed 2.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:02:11 21:28:57 Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Snapseed 2.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:02:01 17:08:11 Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365
...last one.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Snapseed 2.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:01:28 20:57:09 Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365
critique my noobish photography
shooting with t3i 18-55mm kit lens baka
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T3i Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:20 16:52:43 Exposure Time 1/20 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3456 Image Height 5184 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2774165
Before photography I would consider goals like literacy first. Read the sticky.
>>2774165
I don't know what to tell you lad, it's a photo of tree silhouettes during a sunset in a small suburb. the same subject matter can be found by looking at a #sunset tag on Instagram and seeing photos of the same thing taken on shitty androids that will look near same.
Try getting photos with a more complex composition or subject matter
do you have any different photos?
Watch some youtube videos on photography before playing with your new toy from Best Buy.
Look up videos on every function of your camera, get in the habit of shooting manual, and be ready to take up an entire day going to someplace interesting and finding something good to shoot.
Source: I was you 5 years ago.
I was wondering, can you put lens on a Sony HandyCam HDR-CX405?
>>2773923
>Lens Thread
Sony HandyCam
what an abomination of a thread this is
>>2773971
It has 9.2 megapixels and still beats nikon's offerings. You can't beat that 60x zoom.
hey guys!
i was searching about 360 degree cameras lately and i decided to buy one of them very soon. I would like to ask you what could i shoot with a 360 degree camera? I have some projects to make a short-movie and music clips and i wonder what is the usage of a 360degree? I searched some videos, here are the links;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6SsB3JYqQg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvkwAlaDais
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lsB-P8nGSM
and some cameras;
http://video.360heros.com/
http://dailytekk.com/2015/09/08/the-7-best-360-cameras-and-rigs-for-shooting-insanely-awesome-vr-video/
https://360fly.com/
http://www.360.tv/en/
So what is the limit of these cameras in your mind?
Let me start with "nightlife.istanbul". This will be my project after i got that camera. ".ist,.istanbul" is a new for internet just like ".net,.com.org" etc. and what i want to do is capturing all bars & night clubs both in day and night to show people especially tourists, where they might want to go. Basicly that's it.
Yeah, what you think?
IMHO one of the biggest issues with 360˚ video is finding subjects/scenarios that actually benefit from being filmed in 360˚ & actually promote the viewer to look around them. The 360˚ aspect should offer some sort of advantage to the viewer over a traditional fixed frame that is moved by the director.
A lot of 360˚ video I've seen so far falls foul of this, like the second YouTube link you posted. Nearly all of the action takes place directly in front of the viewer's initial position, with almost no need to move the point of view at all - in fact, the view directly behind the viewer is just a featureless garage door for the entire scene!
Shooting 360˚ video also isn't cheap - for the same price as a 360˚ setup that provides relatively mediocre image quality with very little creative control, you could buy a very good traditional video setup. So you really have to use the 360˚ aspect as something other than a gimmick.
I got your point, if a shot moves without your decision and all you can do is just to look around, it's kinda boring. What i think over this argument is, let people look around however, main subject moves around the camera slowly that audience can capture and follow the quest. Not quickly nor very slowly but catchable easily and made people think they have some role in the movie.
the elimination of "creative control" is one of the main concepts of 360 recording / VR playback. photography/cinematography has always centered on choosing the perfect composition to impose the creator's intent on the viewer. we are now removing most of the author's ability to control what the viewer sees and giving them the same freedom to observe as someone physically present in the scene.
