Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 35. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
working for a school and getting paid over the summer is amazing
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5DS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer www.reagandpufall.com Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:03 23:19:41 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 38.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 900 Image Height 600 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2857702
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5DS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer www.reagandpufall.com Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:06 13:03:52 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 38.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 900 Image Height 600 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2857704
probably the last new mantis portrait for a very long time
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5DS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer www.reagandpufall.com Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:06 20:10:33 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 65.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 900 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
a̶m̶a̶z̶i̶n̶g̶
the problem
You public union cunts destroy everything.
just got a cam and am running around taking snapshits everywhere
are these worth editing, or should i just format & forget they ever happened?
>>2853744
>>2853745
>>2853746
I really like this one.
I know I may be asking for much since it's such a subjective topic but can we have a civil discussion on what exactly makes film images look different than digital?
And how could one replicate it with digital cameras in post?
___
Obviously film records images differently than a digital sensor. But the images we see on the computer were converted to digital with a scanner. So how does the film look carry over to the digital version?
___
Small format film tends to look blurry/fuzzy and have visible grain but even medium and large format...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2851692
>Obviously film records images differently than a digital sensor. But the images we see on the computer were converted to digital with a scanner. So how does the film look carry over to the digital version?
the same way an oil painting looks fairly decent when captured in a digital photo. you are capturing a flat canvas where all information is stored within a fraction of a mm surface.
scanning a neg =/= photographing reality, some people tend to forget about this little detail.
Emulsions, film ISO, low resolution scanning and printing, etc
>>2851692
Colors
They can be recreated. Those portra profiles for lightroom are so good you can't tell the difference between that and a good scan
Ask all stupid questions here.
How do I do this crumpled/faded look in CS5? Pic related.
So I bought a Chaika 2 without a shutter curtain. Guess I can't use it for shooting right? lol
At least it was only 5 bucks and came with a broken Industar 69
>>2844441
>Industar 69
you could probably use that on a MFT camera
Hi! I came across this picture and I'm wondering what kind of filter the photographer have used? I do know that the photo has been in either Photoshop or in Lightroom but I still wonder how I get this kind of effect.
>>2857368
Bright light, over exposure, tan girls. Maybe a bit of vibrance added in post.
>>2857368
>How do I get this effect?
Be rich and not fat.
Post you Kodachromes.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model Nexus 5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:06 19:17:09 Exposure Time 12503077/500000000 sec F-Number f/2.4 ISO Speed Rating 235 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Flash No Flash Focal Length 3.97 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 726 White Balance Auto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3532 Image Height 2380 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:06 18:58:57 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 664
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Created 2016:06:06 18:50:57 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 670 Image Height 1000
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3532 Image Height 2380 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:06 19:09:32 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 671
Bored late at night here, wondering what everyone has done to get their names/photos out there. I know there are so so so many 'photographers' out there. Most of them just starting out with their Iphones or posting selfies with their DSLR posting about "OMG just became a photographer!" editing them with instagram filters.
I've been passionate about photography for many years and only recently gathered the funds to start buying my own gear instead of borrowing. Has always been an expensive hobby but would love to get my name out there. Would love...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2857296
>Most of them just starting out with their Iphones or posting selfies with their DSLR posting about "OMG just became a photographer!" editing them with instagram filters.
You're one of them. Have some self-awareness. Go do something else.
I actually sell camera equipment as well as take photos so when I'm selling I usually use my photos as a demonstration for certain lenses or bodies. Then sometimes I get asked if I could do a photo shoot for that person. Then every so often one person tells another person and before you know it you've got a stream of customers both looking to buy gear and customers looking to have a shoot done. It's especially nice during wedding and graduation season because people will come in to buy a camera for their kid as a gift and end up buying it as well as wanting a...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2857296
Go meet people. Become a positive part of the community. Produce photos that people remember/like more than the others around them. Have something unique or interesting to say.
>that feel when you emigrated with the grand idea of becoming a self employed photographer/assistant and ended up back working in IT
How did eric kim do it? I feel like I'll never become locally successful
>>2857238
I don't follow him but from what I've seen he mainly finances himself through workshops. He manages to fill these because he has a personality that people like and I think because the directness of his photographs is something people want to learn.
From what I've seen art jobs are just super competetive. You need to have a style that people like and you need to be able to sell yourself really well.
>>2857238
If you want people to pay you for your photos, then you have to take photos that the people around you will pay for. That's usually providing a service, like shooting a wedding, engagement, senior photos, birthdays, etc. If you want to make money with your knowledge, you have to take your time to give it to people through workshops or something online.
Nobody is going to pay you for photos of flowers and sticks and strangers' backs on the street, and why would they? What are they going to do with that?
>>2857238
I'm a scientist and I've made peace with the fact I'll never make money from my hobby, it'll remain just that.
How to get colors like this /p/?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlaeJ6k75cY&
How can I edit my photos to look like it?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Francko Guttierez Image-Specific Properties:
>>2857157
>Guttierez
You have to go back, Paco. Save your money because you're going to pay for the wall. Make America Great Again.
>>2857157
You fuck with the split tone sliders and colour temperature. Put some green/blue in the shadows and leave the highlights white should do it
Is this true?
it must be if you found it on the internet
So fuji must be a wholesome woman
You forgot to make fun of filmfags and the rich bastards that shoot digital Leicas and Phase Ones.
I just inherited a Pentax 'program plus' from my mom. She never used it and gave it to me a week ago. I just got it up and running, and am thinking about getting into photography as a small hobby maybe. Any tips or pointers I should know?
Also, is there anyone else who is just starting out?
The first place you go to for tips or pointers is 4chan? You need a lot more help than just that.
Just go out there and shoot.
Don't copy others and develop your own style.
>>2855967
Exposure triangle, diffraction, depth of field
These are the things you have to look up on the internet. Develop your film at a lab and ask for the negatives.
How do I repair it? :(
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make XIAOMI Camera Model HM1S Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Exposure Time 1/17 sec ISO Speed Rating 600 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 3.85 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Time (UTC) 18:17:28 Date (UTC) 2016:06:04
>>2855655
>throw it in the thrash
>buy a non meme camera
>>2855655
It's on the inside btw. I can only see it's broken when I turn it on
>>2855655
And that's why you buy cameras with viewfinder
Alien base ?
"ConsumeConsume explore a world near overdose by using satellite photography :
http://consume-consume.com/"
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
The problem isn't consumption, the problem is overpopulation.
>>2854786
you need proles to make goods.
>>2854786
What does overpopulation mean?
Maybe that more products need to be produced?
But then again, there is an overabundance of
products.
So, the main problem is even distribution.
Right now, as in all of human history, distribution
of goods is all but uneven. Systemically uneven.
The production unit in pic related is not meant to
serve people equally, it is made to produce profit.
Just got out of surgery, sold some vital organs to be able to afford this setup. Now i can finally take those family portraits i've always wanted.
but in all seriousness, why the fuck would anyone drop this much money on this shit
Because they probably don't own it unless they are very rich. You would either rent the camera when you needed it for a shoot or it would belong to the agency/company which you work for and which would provide it to you.
And that lens is a cine lens, it's not for photographers it's for movie studios which rent those lenses from rental companies that stock and maintain all that type of equipment.
And why don't you just shitpost in the gear thread instead of making more threads?
>>2854117
"people" don't buy them. Major studios, agencies, and rental houses buy them and then spend the rest of the gear's lifetime renting them out to artists who will use them.
The fujinon is a cinema lens, so it would be a rental house or a movie studio that would buy a lens like that and make its money back very quickly.
The hasselblad is a top-tier commercial product that will deliver unrivaled images and blows anything you'd produce from your shitty consumer dslr out of the water. It's something you'd use to shoot a 4 million dollar ad campaign, not the senior photos down in Fuxacousin, Alabama.
I hate myself for starting this thread, but need some advice. I need a wide to normal zoom. Canon fag, have tok 11-16, 70-200f4, 18-55kit lens, 100l. Had a 17-85 that I absolutely hated, so I sold it. I'm need of something to replace this and the 18-55, as that feels cheap and horrible.
Don't care about brand. Constant aperture very much preferred, internal focus preferred, internal zoom would be great but unlikely. Obviously good image quality is necessary.
Use the gear thread you stupid prick
>>2851645
I am using this older version of Tamron 17-50/2.8 and I like it. http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/289-tamron-af-17-50mm-f28-sp-xr-di-ii-ld-aspherical-if-canon-test-report--review
New version seems to have much worse optical quality.
>>2853813
Either Canon 15-85mm, which is a great lens, or
>Constant aperture very much preferred
Canon 16-35 f4 is/ f2.8
Sigma 18-35 f1.8
