Gear Thread
Doing exams on the weekend edition.
If you have questions about a new camera, what lenses to buy and anything related to gear or wondering about getting into photography, post it in this thread.
Do not attempt to make a new thread for your new Rabal, broken glass and being new. You have been warned!
I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!
And don't forget, be polite!
Previous thread: >>2713038
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software paint.net 4.0.6 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 2000 dpi Vertical Resolution 2000 dpi
I just bought an A7rii.
How much better am I now than all of you?
>>2715525
You have a camera that can take photos, just like everyone else on this board.
>>2715526
No I don't think you understand. I'm DEFINITELY better than you now, I just want to know how much.
How does /p/ feel about purposefully adding grain to a photo? It seems rather counter intuitive when most are trying to make their images as clear as possible.
This is an image I recently added slight amount to. I personally believe in some cases it adds a texture to the image, makes it look real and alive.
Thought?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T5i Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:02 07:19:17 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/11.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 48.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3456 Image Height 5184 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
editing photos in general is dumb and if you cant take a proper photo without the need to edit its exposure, composition, etc you should stop taking pictures or switch to film to learn the basics of photography
>>2713882
aah yes, because taking advantage of technological advancements its such a fucking crime.
>>2713886
>taking advantage of
you said it yourself..
if you can't shoot with proper exposure, framing, composition, color. contrast, etc. dont pretend that you can.
Looking to get a 600 series Polaroid camera because I'm a dirty fucking hipster.
Which ones do you recommend?
>>2713323
they are all the same. i wouldn't waste your money on one right now to be honest. the film is just way too expensive. BUT if you have the cash....
get the polaroid sx-70 onestep. its the one i have and will make you an EXTRA dirty hipster.
i have another type that i got at a garage sale (the best place to get polaroid cameras for cheap) but again, haven't used it, because the film is too expensive.
>>2713323
Do you plan on using it? Why no Instax, they are ugly as fuck but at least they don't make you poor
>>2713423
I do, actually.
I like the appeal of those old instant photos. Nostalgia if you will.
Post ur instant pics
(no matter how bad it hurts)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model LGMS631 Equipment Make LG Electronics Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2256 White Balance Auto Flash No Flash Focal Length 3.97 mm Light Source Unknown Image Orientation Unknown Metering Mode Unknown Image Height 2216 Image Created 2015:11:30 10:25:19 Altitude 0.00 m
>>2712940
Taking a terrible photo of nothing on an interesting medium is still a terrible photo of nothing. What about these scenes necessitates (or even remotely lends itself to) an instant format?
fp-100c45
Why haven't you bought a Leica yet?
>>2712528
i have a canon. i don't need another camera.
2poor
>>2712528
My E-M1 has much more functionality at a much much lower price.
making a tumblr thread, last one died.
post links to your photography tumblr urls with a picture that represents your style. give feedback, recs, etc.
3oiles.tumblr.com
>>digital photography art
>>experimental
>>multiple exposures
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2632 Image Height 1980 Scene Capture Type Standard
Sure thing.
http://alexburkephoto.tumblr.com/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Photographer Alex Burke Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2014:06:11 21:50:20 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 805
Méh, haven't been productive at all recently.
http://feldspath.tumblr.com/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2.1 (Macintosh) Photographer Feldspath Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:11:15 23:19:51 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>old one 3hunna
guys, how do I shoot a photo like pic-related? what setup do i have to use, or anything in photoshop? i like the old photo feeling. i have some hasselblads and also a nikon d4 if that helps.
cheers<3
>>2680703
I'm afraid you're going to have to upgrade your gear to get that kind of look.
>>2680704
what do i need? i swear this is like my holy grail esque photo, help me bro
>inb4 bait
email the girl who left her watermark on the picture and ask her what she did
hey /p/ i need a favour
so long story short i need pics like pic related without copyright shit and with better os at least as good quality preferable taken by yourselves and with permission to use any way i want (ofc that if i use them i`ll give the usual credit "photo taken by: XXX")
i`m counting on you guys
p.s.- computer on pic is essential and comfy environments are welcome ty.
>>2716275
Here, this chart should help.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 960 Image Height 960 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2716275
Sure, my rates start at £150 per shot.
Let me know if you're interested.
I would leave my email, but something tells me you're not interested. If you're not interested in paying for any of our collective experience, talent, time and equipment costs; do us all a favour and fuck off.
:)
How much do you pay?
I just got a Canon 70d and I am a pretty newbie. Can I have some feedback?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:09:30 15:32:04 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 29.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5417 Image Height 3612 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2716255
resize your photos so the longest side is right around 1k pixels, and post some more bitch
>>2716255
were you into leaves before you bought a camera?
I dusted off the camera.
Different model than I'm used to.
Hey /p/
So I recently purchased a Canon EOS 6D with the 24-105mm f4 and I am now trying to build up my lens collection. I have a bit of money to spend but I don't want to blow it on an expensive lens when something cheaper will do just as well from my purposes (total casual when it comes to photography; first DSLR).
So here's what I'd like to get within the next few months:
50mm prime
85mm prime
35mm prime
70-200 telephoto
Wide angle
Now, as far as prime lenses, the Sigma 50mm 1.4 Art has jumped out at me, but it's a bit more than I wanted to spend on one lens at this point. I could either go with the Sigma, or instead pick up the Canon 50mm 1.4 as well as a Canon 35mm or 85mm. Which would you recommend?
I was also looking at the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM as a telephoto. I also noticed they have another one has image stabilization, but it's also about twice as much. Should I get the one with IS or go with the cheaper one?
Haven't looked too much into the Wide angles. Any you could recommend?
I know I'm kinda asking a lot of questions. I'm just new to this, and I was hoping for some informed opinions on the subject. Much appreciated.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2008:05:13 08:57:11 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2658 Image Height 1225
>50mm
The Nifty Fifty
>35mm
The Nifty Fifty with 3-5 steps back
>85
The Nifty Fifty with 3-5 steps forward
>70-200
The Nifty Fifty with varying amounts of steps forward.
>>2716003
Is the image quality really negligible between the 1.8 and the 1.4 (or 1.2)? I'd like to get the best quality possible without spending more than a grand.
>>2716007
The Nifty Fifty is about $125, so you can get 8 of them to cover all of your needs.
So I just bought a Nikon D7100. This is my first DSLR. I'm fairly new at photography as a hobby. Is this too much camera for a newb?
No camera is to much for a noob.
Heres the only advice you need, don't come back to /p/ until you've shot your first 10k frames, you don't need these dicks ruining your early experiences.
Oh also, don't be a gear fag. Nice gear is nice, buy when it comes down to it, you're taking the photo.
>>2715967
what this guy said times 5
come back when you are confident enough to post a few photos, then get ready to be harshly criticized, learn from it and repeat
my other tips:
>Go look at other/find pictures/photographers that you like and try out different styles, you never know if you like people portraits or landscapes more
>Avoid facebook and social media sites, they are most likely to not give you any advice, but instead, give you dis-honest...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2715981
Why avoid watermarks. Won't people just steal your work if you don't add "My Name Photography" at the bottom?
I recently got my first photo pass to photograph the group 'The Chainsmokers' at the Roseland Theater. It was a great experience overall! Tell me what you think of my shots from that night.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Created 2015:12:04 23:09:12 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
2/14
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Created 2015:12:04 23:09:21 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 13.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
3/14
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Created 2015:12:04 23:09:29 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
4/14
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Created 2015:12:04 23:09:15 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
I'm ready to go small.
Should I get anything else than a Ricoh GRV?
Goto gear thread!Enjoy your dust.
You can look out for Coolpix A or Fuji x100 series.
Now you can delete the thread.
>>2714524
been using a GR for over two years and I have had no problems with dust. I get that some people have tho.
IMO it's the best pocket camera.
>>2714518
coolpix a
post em up.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448
>>2708694
You should start a new type of thread, called:
>Here are some photos I've taken with my guns because your camera doesn't matter and being a consumer isn't nearly as impressive as I previously thought it was, so I'll try being a creative artist in stead.
>>2708694
Wow, I've never seen such a collection of mediocre obsolete shit. please share mroe often.
Repostan I guess.
I've been into photography for quite a while and recently started taking actually taking pictures. I've never taken classes or anything similar.
>pic related, took it this morning, thoughts?
Another picture from this morning. Also itt post your favourite/recent pictures that you took
These look exactly like every picture people take when they first start out.
>>2716465
I'm pretty much one of them, aren't I?