Archived threads in /tg/ - Traditional Games - 796. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Order of the Stick #1030: Naming Names
>trolling
The first panel is the only important one.
>>46248058
third panel is also kinda worth notice as a self-contained joke
How do you make a ruthless tyrannical princess that in not the BBEG?
>>46245440
Have them be right.
>>46245440
She's a tyrant because she doesn't respect the lord-vassal relationship.
Turns out the vassals are shitters, and who cares about the nobility?
>>46245440
Just make them on the same side as the protagonist and make the enemies worse.
Ever played with a typical "meathead" or a typical "bimbo"?
How did it go?
>>4624468
one time an ant came onto the table and i tried to pet it but i crushed it :/
[Cake playing in background]
>>46244685
I had a meathead sit down and join us back in high school for a few sessions once because he'd seen us chuck dice and talk shop during lunch and figured he'd at least give it a try before making fun of us. He played a bard and considered himself to be, in-character, a rock star, and thus fully capable of getting "the bitches". It was actually pretty fun and our Stick-up-the-ass Sorcerer hated it. He said that he'd play if he saw another game around, but probably wouldn't pursue it.
What is his alignment (D&D)?
Is murderer an alignment?
>>46243644
Lawful Evil?
>>46243669
No more than hobo
>GM/Player
>System Preferred
>Times Available (with timezone!)
>Method of Play (Skype, IRC, roll20, etc)
>Contact Info
>Additional Notes
>GM/Player
Player
>System Preferred
5e
>Times Available (with timezone!)
Evenings, CST/EST but I am flexible
>Method of Play (Skype, IRC, roll20, etc)
Whatever, really. I prefer text to voice but it's not really a deal breaker.
>Contact Info
Skype: glorytusk
>Additional Notes
I am new to tabletop RPGs.
Please don't die again.
>>46245897
i think its gonna die
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SFM6-LC6io
>There are people on this board who'll play as overgrown leeches and sacks of decaying flesh
How heretical
>>46242318
>>46242318
>There are people on this board who'll play this game released by overgrown leeches
I mean, I didn't particularly even mind that they wanted to nickel and dime people for the other factions.
I thought; "Okay, that's just the way games are these days."
But what really pisses me off to the extent of personally boycotting SEGA is the way that they ALSO pull so many features out of the game.
You can't reconquer the Empire of Mourkain...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>46242428
>There are people on this board who'll play this game released by overgrown leeches
![legio-victorum-2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nhtxmi1.jpg "legio-victorum-2[1].jpg")
i liked the 40k epic thread.
i am completely new to it and want to see it discussed more.
(can anyone explain the part about some secret club selling mini's?)
![chaos-knight-gilgamesh-in-two-scales-1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/AItQCQC.jpg "chaos-knight-gilgamesh-in-two-scales-1[1].jpg")
>>46240343
Saw this the other day, someone built a Chaos Knight for 40k, then made an Epic-scale version of the same Knight! Love the creativity.but i would fucking love if someone would tell me where to get one of those forumware Epic Cerastus knights
>>46240527
did he scrap built this ?
![chibi-knight-wip-19[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/NA4CH7j.jpg "chibi-knight-wip-19[1].jpg")
>>46240698
Kitbash; termi torso on raptor legs, with CSM pauldrons glued on the wrong way (he won't say where the parts for the feet are from).
https://eternalhunt.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/the-warrior-king-reloaded-one-last-look/
Wtf MaRo. Are they really taking this shit THIS seriously?Apologies for being a mobile poster but I was reading this on break and had to share.
What the fuck?
Non-issue that didn't require a thread to be made.
>>46240186
That's... uncharacteristically aggressive for MaRo. Especially since the question wasn't particularly disrespectful, and could very possibly have been someone who actually likes the way the story has been going, and maybe just wanted to be clever.
Boros Edition
>RESOURCES
http://www.mtgcommander.net
>Official Site: Contains deck building rules and the current ban list.
http://www.tappedout.net
>Deck List Site: You can search for decks that other people have made. Authors often have comments that explain their deck’s strategy and card choices.
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/the-game/commander-edh
>Another resource for commander discussion; they have an entire forum...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Boros edition? Aright. In the steel cage, which Boros commander would win in a no rules cage match?
Posting this list once more. Looking for advice on making this deck list more cutthroat. The idea is to have a B/W control deck capable of forcing the game into a state of advantage for itself over time.
http://www.mtgvault.com/phobes365/decks/bw-edh/
>>46238921
Pretty sure the OP would win every time. Indestructible is pretty good.
How do you make a horror campaign that actually scares your players?
Add Skeletons. ALL OF THEM
1.you must be a good story teller
2.learn what's spooky, play an appropriate system. If it devolves into grid based combat for an hour it will be the opposite of spooky.
3.95% of horror is build up
I've scared my players before. What you need to realize is that a horror campaign is like a horror story, you need to narrate as if you're telling a horror story, and structure it like a good horror story, with slow build up, mystery, intrigue, tension, and finally BIG BOOMING HORRORS.
The more you can get them roleplaying and in their character's shoes, the more scared you can make them.
Why is Slivers making a comeback?
Why do people still use Bogles?
Why do people use Burn decks when it's matchups can be unwinnable?
Did you know that MBC players like sniffing paint?
>Why is Slivers making a comeback?
Decks that handle it well aren't significant in the current meta.
>Why do people still use Bogles?
No, but we still act like it's relevant.
>Why do people use Burn decks when it's matchups can be unwinnable?
Same reason people use burn decks in any format.
>Did you know that MBC players like sniffing paint?
Wait. / like sniffing paint. Was I a MBC player this whole time without realizing?
>>46235522
>Dead Format Edition
It would really help if you just used a cool staple or a promising new common as the OP image. This one doesn't really stand out in the catalog.
Would this have any potential at all?
>>46237948
>3 mana to dig 4
1 mana can dig three
That's only justifiable for also filling your graveyard,
but it doesn't do that very well either.
you can add things and discuss those things.
I'll start: the world was originally shaped by five sages, one of earth, one of water, one of fire, one of wood and one of metal.
>>46234268
Fine, I'll take the bait.
This world's magic system runs on alchemy.
There is a small faction that abhors magic and all it stands for and prefers instead to focus on clockwork machinery and augmentation. They will occasionally attack buildings of magical import, such as schools, libraries or places of worship and are considered terrorists.
>>46234268
>Fire
>Earth
>Water
>Wood
>Metal
So which of these do we breath seeing as how we don't have any fucking oxygen/air.?
The newly united people of the Colony and the Plainsrunners look up in awe as the shadow of the New Necrotic Fleets first Flagship passes over and swallows the town in temporary twilight. High above in the upper atmosphere the colossal craft drifts as you glide through it's wide halls. Catwalks and balconies of bone and pitted metal surround you, braziers of glowing crystal or torches of voidflame illuminating your path.
The core of the massive craft sleeps and dreams in silence, the hallways an airless void. Kyn'tk twists in on hand and you gaze at the insectoid...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
i thought you were kill
>>46231065
IT LIVES
![tms-064[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/L2mh0kv.jpg "tms-064[1].jpg")
