rate 8/8
>>2374638
Rate what and whats with the 9gag watermark?
Who has the greatest love of art?
Artist, Art-Lover, Art-Thief or Art-Forger?
>>2373358
Artist
the rest do not exist without the artist
Also, that pic looks like it was thrown together by a person with no understanding.
>>2373358
>Art-Forger
Is a artist too
add on if ya can
u did not just compare Giacometti to a college student. get your shit together OP.
>>2384680
feel free to move around shit if ya want, this is merely a skeleton.
I hate that american "old master" meme.
how can improve this?
i know it's bad, no need to tell
your good stop wasting your time on this boardfagggggggggggggggggggggggggoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
>>2384629
draw 1000 more hearts from reference, every 20 drawings draw an additional 5 hearts from memory/imagination
by the end you'll be able to draw a bretty gud heart
>>2384629
Don't make your own thread fucktard, read the sticky, get keys to drawing, do the exercises, go to the beginner thread.
Post your Tumblrs, Instagrams, Deviant art. etc
last thread >>2347503
>>2369735
www.abdushakur.com
>>2369746
thanks anon. interpols anti terrorism squad just came crashing through my window and confiscated my computer.
posting from phone
>>2369735
http://ammobot-hb.deviantart.com/
http://ammobot-hb.tumblr.com/
We tryin.
Can I become a master only by myself?
>>2384578
???
>>2384578
go to the question thread idiot
>>2384593
Dont make me unsheathe my katana noob
Good? No good?
>>2381858
no good
No good.
>>2381868
no, good!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockney–Falco_thesis
>The Hockney–Falco thesis is a theory of art history, advanced by artist David Hockney and physicist Charles M. Falco. Both claimed that advances in realism and accuracy in the history of Western art since the Renaissance were primarily the result of optical instruments such as the camera obscura, camera lucida, and curved mirrors, rather than solely due to the development of artistic technique and skill. Nineteenth-century artists' use of photography had been well documented.[1] In a 2001 book, Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters, Hockney analyzed the work of the Old Masters and argued that the level of accuracy represented in their work is impossible to create by "eyeballing it". Since then, Hockney and Falco have produced a number of publications on positive evidence of the use of optical aids, and the historical plausibility of such methods. The hypothesis led to a variety of conferences and heated discussions.
Where is your god now artfags?
>>2384386
Not this fucking garbage again
>>2384386
>that pic
you are an artfag yourself and ask this?
no rules, just tools nigga
you are blessed to live in a world where picture exist, so you can do a study, and when doing a portrait irl you will know to render better. you have mirrors so can detect flows in your art, and focus on dismissing them. the number of ppl which can afford the luxury to do art is bigger, so you get more critique than ever and from different points of view
you don't have to reinvent the wheel, which means more time to pick up and take art to the next level
ofcourse stuff which give us more time, stuff which helps us detect flows, stuff which helps us connect with more ppl are all gonna add up and rise the bar
>>2384411
>No rules, just tools
This is not what Vilppu was talking about at all.
You can't honestly conflate when he says "No Rules, Just Tools®" with Photobashing and the like when he often says in his very next breath that "We don't 'copy' the model' and that '99% of the drawing you do will be from imagination'.
The whole theory is obviously Hockney projecting his own butthurt, as he's someone who can't paint nearly as well as the old masters WITH all of the tools he accuses them of using (and the contrast between his assisted work and imaginative work is stark). Few of the old masters would have been even close to 100% reliant on these sorts of tools and fewer of them still would have been able to afford to have models present for more than a fraction of the work they'd done.
Hello!
With a semi cancerous request here. One of you fine people drew pic related for me a while back to use as an avatar. If you are reading this, a big thank you!
But that was a while ago and i would like a new one since i've grown a beard. As a reward i can offer an unused code for Witcher 3 - hearts of stone expansion pack for the playstation 4.
If you want the code, just be a tripfag for a second so i know who to request as a friend on steam or something to give the code.
It can look/have the same kind of artstyle but i'm not limiting anything here. I will post a refrence pic if anyone is interested and don't worry, no neckbeard.
I can delete the thread after.
>semi cancerous
>>2383057
very sarcastic. very. I just don't know anyone with skill.
Your only choice is to shave your beard.
Is kim jung gi better than Michelangelo? Or better than any old master at all?
Is he autistic?
How do he explain the shit he does? This guy is talented
He does 1 thing very difficult very well. But on a whole scale his compositions are pretty lacking.
So no, he really isnt that great, stop with the kimeme.
>probably the greatest artist to have ever graced thris planet
>korean
Gooks win again, white tears feed his pen
For you fucks who can shade good and draw realistically but can't do sexy to save your life.
>>2384074
those breasts look like a pair of blown up balloons
>>2384079
H O M O
O M
M O
O M O H
>>2384074
>implying this is even remotely sexy
Are you even fucking trying?
Are we witnessing the end of traditional media? Tiltbrush combines digital art and the physical sensation of real painting.
http://youtu.be/n97Q4sDawAs
>>2383592
VR is too expensive at the moment
you are witnessing a market that won't go mainstream another 2-5 years
>>2383592
No.
Traditional won't die.
I don't know what to do anymore, /ic/...
I want to
>do fine art
>do animoo shit
>do animoo porn
>make a comic
>do concept art for video games
ALL AT THE SAME TIME
I end up working on several things at a time and I feel like I'll never make progress in any of them if I don't focus on just one... But I also have to think of something that can be at least a bit profitable...
How do I make up my mind? Have you guys gone through something similar?
>>2383582
Dont create art just because you want to make money.
sit down and really focus on gittin gud before you do anything else, when you start going after money, it'll come easier if you already know your shit
My mind has done this sort of thing, but I always think that maybe signing up for an art college or someshit would actually get me making stuff.
Like, I can´t really do stuff on my own. I feel like in order to have things in order, I need something like "anon, you must make a character study of this involving this and concept" and then I make it.
Im not too good at thinking on my own.
I love to draw, and Im gud imo, but with this power, I don´t know what to draw desu.
How did you get through this?
I know I need to master the absolute basics before doing anything but drawing lines and cubes is so demotivating when you have this idea of how good you want to be. I feel like once I would enter the stage where I can produce half-decent drawings I would be a lot more motivated to work on improving myself. But I just can't find the drive to get there even though I know there is no way around it and I do want to be able to draw.
>>2382982
>How did you get through this?
I didn't.
...Why am I still here?
>>2382982
Why are you asking, it says right one there. You persevere, you keep working, keep pushing, until eventually you get there.
"You've just gotta fight your way through."
>>2382982
>master the absolute basics before doing anything but drawing lines and cubes
This is how autists think. You've seen 5 year olds paint before haven't you?
Don't fear colours, work on your skills as a whole. This isn't some hierarchy of shit to be learned. I mean, I didn't really get values until I started painting. It clicked when I was able to create a single-value flat painting with all the values encoded in warm/cool contrast.
We're all going to make it brah. That or become fucking photocopiers.
Alright if I don't call this done I'll spend another week on it.
There aren't lines, admittedly I got lazy and used lines in some parts, but if you're doing graphite correctly you don't use lines, you use blocks of shading. The point is to mimic real life where there aren't outlines on things, just different shades. Obviously I didn't do it very well.
before you lose total confidence because of some asshol lemme say you got some good things going on here
>>2384092
Oh?
I'm the artist but I did not post this on this board, some faggot from a /tg/ drawthread did it to be an asshole and take me down a peg because I turned down some advice and the whole thread threw a hissyfit over it.
To summarize, the advice was to use lineweight because things are too blurry. My response was that that wasn't a useful critique because the method specifically isn't supposed to use lines.
But hey, since they went out of their way to post it here for you guys to "chew you off and tell you the truth about what you've done" I might as well hear how much I suck.
![aDo1B1B_460s[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/KeJxQst.jpg "aDo1B1B 460s[1]")
