Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 3215. page
- Home
- Board: /g/ - Technology
- Reading: Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 3215. page
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34942685
>A new method of delivering data, which uses the visible spectrum rather than radio waves, has been tested in a working office.
>Li-fi can deliver internet access 100 times faster than traditional wi-fi, offering speeds of up to 1Gbps (gigabit per second).
>Velmenni used a li-fi-enabled light bulb to transmit data at speeds of 1Gbps. Laboratory tests have shown theoretical speeds of up to 224Gbps.
Will this catch on? Could I download the entire Taken series in a second or two?
>>51563072
>uses the visible spectrum rather than radio waves
I guess that makes sense. What's the range on these things?
>>51563072
You could download it from a server on the local network if it has matching disk speeds. Which it won't have. Also you won't have a server with the entire Taken series locally.
>>51563072
This makes absolutely zero sense in the real world.
Why? Because visible light can't pass through our bodies, or walls. What good would it be if you walked between the bulb and your laptop and cut the connection?
Which is better to get into and why?
>>51563063
Computer science
Because software engineering isn't an academic degree and you end up being a code monkey.
software engineering is a subcategory of computer science
One isn't science and one isn't engineering.
If true is false what is true? fucking nerds. Where is your god now?
>>51562964
It's simple nigger.
If false is set to true, then its true.
>>51563002
If false is set to true, then its false.
>>51563036
But if false is set to false, then it's true.
>make $60k a year
>work 30 hours a week
>don't even know calculus
web dev master race reporting in. what's your career /g/?
Damn man, and here I thought I was poor. How can you even live on a five figure income? I barely get by on 130k.
>>51562909
dumb frogposter
>>51562929
He probably doesn't live on the moon unlike you
Old /dpt/ at >>51557857
What are you working on?
memifying memelangs.
>OO "Programming"
Let's play what's in the box
>>51562788
another box
a new mac
>>51562788
A packing pillow.
![Android-Marshmallow-10-1280x855[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/sN2bTGm.jpg "Android-Marshmallow-10-1280x855[1]")
>tfw updated nightlies without realizing we had made the jump to CM 13
EVERYTHING IS BROKEN
My OnePlus One isn't doing too bad
>>51563015
i have an lg g3
sd card use is completely out of the question. it says a perfectly formatted card is corrupted and when the device itself formats it, it turns into a 16mb unusable card
also, when i connect my g3 to my computer, i can't access the storage.
it's been fun figuring out how to get gApps onto the damn internal storage.
i finally just downloaded it through my browser but my browser kept malfunctioning and every 3 seconds i have to close a notification about gApps
>>51563158
Ha LG L90 master race with bug free CM13
Should I get the FX 8320e or the 6350? And, on the GPU side, should I get the r9 380 or gtx 960? For reference, I'm coming from a FX 4300, and a gtx 550 ti. I'll be using it on a 1680 x 1050 monitor.
wait for zen
>1680x1050
why
>>51562613
Because I got this monitor in 2005, and I love it. I'm not going to bother shilling out 300~ dollars to get a half decent monitor.
>>51562604
I would, but I don't want to wait a year and a half to play games half decently. Also, I don't want to buy a new motherboard.
is this actually any better?
300megs
neat
>>51562376
no it's shit, buy nvivdia
could we always have different overclocks for different games?
![samsung-ue40ju6000-tv-light-leak[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/TPF5Do0.jpg "samsung-ue40ju6000-tv-light-leak[1]")
I just bought one of these cunts for £350.
I don't own a TV, does anyone have any experience with it?
>>51562122
High latency, enjoy
Great for movies, sports, tv in general
Kinda shitty for games due to the resolution being so high
>>51562122
Now you need a uhd dvd player and order uhd DVDs from amazon
Help me out senpai.
Im trying to get a new tv, 40"smart.
Im currently leaning towards ths sony w600b, but people are telling me to get the vizio e40
I know nothing about tvs so I was wondering what your guys take is on it
>>51562105
I would suggest getting a bigger tv. 40" is nothing really.
Why would you ever buy a TV? Do you consume media like a fucking normal?
>>51562136
Its for a relatively small bedroom, also dont like gaming on too big of a tv. I know sony is a solid brand buy im wondering if vizio here would be better
Should I go the comfortable route and get a 4970k with an lga1150 motherboard or should I plunge into the future with a 6700k and an lga1151 motherboard? Not to mention DDR4 memory. Is the future bright /g/?
>>51562010
Go X99
>>51562010
If you're buying latest gen, there is a price. Unless you specifically need CPU performance (aka, not gaming), it's probably not worth it.
>>51562042
This. Really not impressed with Skylake, was able to go X99 for only a little bit more and get more overall performance + cache. Try to snag the 5820K on sale if you go this route now though, Broadwell-E chips will be out early next year.
Is there a bigger meme than 64bit processors on a smartphone ? Is there any real benefit to it ?
You can have more than 4GB of RAM!
No phones have more than 4GB of RAM!
You can have apps that use up over 2GB of RAM!
Apps are limited to usually ~<1GB of RAM (192MB on the Nexus 5)!
So it's basically a useless spec that salespeople can point to.
>>51562075
kinda like >720p resolution on phones.. it does nothing but drain more battery!
aren't you glad you bought into this shit.
or larger screens which do nothing but make it unusable with one hand. or unable to comfortably fit in your pocket... also drains more battery life!
why wont the market go back to smaller is better? even the ancients realized this. (see how every great naked man was depicted with a small penis)
>>51562329
Why even have screen? That drains more battery. Camera? Speakers? Cellular connection? Battery drainers.
Can someone educate me on these m.2 drives, the read and write speeds look fantastic on paper, but in real world load and boot times they are barley as good (and sometimes worse) than regular SATA SSD’s.
http://techreport.com/review/29221/samsung-950-pro-512gb-ssd-reviewed/4
So what’s the deal with them? What is their purpose? Will software improve in the future to take advantage of these read speeds or are they just a piece of meme hardware
>>51561828
the fucking 850 evo is faster in some tests
>>51561828
most mobos seem to embrace them now
I'm preparing to leave me mum's basement so I can finally bring some sluts over and get poonanni. I'm planning on cutting way down on bills, especially electric bills. How far can I get with solar panel chargers that I can have inside on my new apartment's floor that I can buy off of amazon?
I know I can recharge an ipad / iphone, but what about a microwave, foreman grill, desktop pc, minifridge?
any help /g/
/g/ please
final bump
