Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 1306. page
- Home
- Board: /g/ - Technology
- Reading: Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 1306. page
How will AMD recover from this?
>>54595321
CPU defendant game, so the results are less impressive
>dat 4k performance gain
bravo nvidia
the 4k card guys
the way it's meant to be played
Is there any point in this? I bought one to try with a laptop and it sounds wrong whether I place it to one side or behind. Don't tell me people actually blast music in public with these with the tablets or phones?
>>54595285
Before someone said >beats,
I did not buy beats.
>>54595297
>Beets
I bought a chink speaker and I use it with my phone, it's comfy
We all know ARM is needed when the lowest power consumption is needed.
But why there exists PowerPC? SPARC? Intel x86 is around here because it is just the most usable architecture, right?
>>54595277
Have all the disadvantages:
>RISC makes compilers hard to implement, CISC makes hardware hard to implement.
>RISC can take more cycles (due to more instructions) to complete a task, CISC will draw more power.
>>54595305
But modern processors aren't CISC, are they?
>>54595277
powerpc is such a beast.
[spoiler]in 2005[/spoiler]
Official Thread #055: The "Ten Eighty" Edition
Good Morning,
This thread is to consolidate graphics card and display technologies discussion to reduce unnecessary thread clutter on /g/. Let's also keep the shilling to a minimum, no-one fucking cares.
Direct any and all questions regarding Graphics Cards and Display Adapters here first, including purchase and sale questions:
Use >>>/g/gcg/
For non-related questions, link to find the stupid questions thread:
>>>/g/sqt
Support questions should be directed to >>>/wsr/, as per /g/'s sticky. Or just fucking Google it instead of shitposting.
The GTX 1080 and its reviews are released tomorrow.
In the news:
>DOOM has a suspicious lean towards Nvidia in its benchmarks. The culprit seems to be the game defaulting to OpenGL 4.3 instead of the more efficient 4.5 no matter which settings when running with an AMD display adapter:
https://twitter.com/idSoftwareTiago/status/731269988242202624
http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/doom_pc_performance_review/8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>id software
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2012 API's
>AMD launching Polaris at Computex:
http://videocardz.com/59947/amd-to-launch-polaris-10-at-computex
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/52124/amd-launching-next-gen-polaris-10-based-radeon-400-series-computex/index.html
If you find any news, post it below! Try to get at least two sources first!
Budget crown:AMD RTG Radeon R9 380X
Performance crown:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 [pending]
/GCG/'s Choice:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 [pending peer review]
Buyer Guides:
>GPU's
www.logicalincrements.com
www.pcpartpicker.com
>Monitors/Displays
https://pcmonitors.info
Logical Increments happily accepts suggestions, comments, and criticisms. Falco Paunch!
Drivers:
http://support.amd.com/en-us/download
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us
Thankyou.
17/05
1080 reviews when?
Polaris reviews when?
Upgrading my R9 280x DC2
I fell for the 6700k meme and sold my 2500k sandy bridge. So my 6700k needs a decent GPU.
Fanboys aside.
1080 (Ti)?
or buy Polaris / wait for Vega?
It's the fucking same story EVERY FUCKING YEAR. HELP ME
Should I sell my R9-290 for $289 and get a GTX1070 for $435?
>>54595396
How do you plan on getting $289 for a 290? You can buy them new for less
"If the founders of a new face recognition app get their way, anonymity in public could soon be a thing of the past. FindFace, launched two months ago and currently taking Russia by storm, allows users to photograph people in a crowd and work out their identities, with 70% reliability."
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/17/findface-face-recognition-app-end-public-anonymity-vkontakte
I barely leave my apartment, but even if I did, how would a photo "work out my identity"?
There isn't a single picture of me on the interent.
Hell, googling my name doesn't even return any results related to me.
only if you're dumb enough to be on social media
>>54595025
>>54595026
>not on Facebook
wew lads, get some lives
What's your favorite technological meme?
Mine's the ppi meme
>>54594702
it's only a meme when
a) it's an inside joke used ironically
b)In /g/'s case when it is "snakeoil" technology
c)When is technology that the mainstream thinks is great, but in reality proves no benefit.
PPI is not a meme, is a characteristic. and depends entirely on the use of the display, as well as the size of the screen, distance from eyes, etc.
>16 GB RAM
Everyone told me "dude weed lmao its 2016 u need 16 gibberish of rams" but I never use more than half of it.
>>54595245
>I personally don't use something so its a meme.
Why is /g/ so cancerous.
Microcucks will defend this.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3053711
Its retarded but you're more retarded if you name you account 'user'.
>>54594617
My Indian cousin Useraji doesn't find this funny…
>>54594617
>voluntarily divulging metadata through descriptive logins
>Moto G4 and the Moto G4 Plus. Both phones share the same basic design with a 5.5-inch 1080p display, a Snapdragon 617 processor and a 3,000mAh battery with fast charging. Where they differ is in the details: The Plus has a 16-megapixel rear camera with an f/2.0 aperture, "big pixels" and laser and phase detection autofocus. It also has a fingerprint sensor. The regular G has a 13-megapixel camera (likely the same as in the current G), and no biometric magic.
>The vanilla Moto G4 comes with 2GB RAM and 16GB internal storage. The G4 Plus will have the same, unless you opt for the model with 32GB of storage, in which case you'll get 3GB of RAM.
>We're still waiting on US pricing, but the UK versions will start at £169 for the regular, and £199 for the Plus.
>G4 plus looks identical but has mildly better hardware and features
Literally why?
>>54594569
>Paying for a device with a locked bootloader
But why?
>>54594609
Because most people don't give a fuck?
I mean, it's already implemented and doesn't come with any noticeable performance increase. Even in most non-sensitive webpages SSL is recommended as it not only encrypts but proves that the webpage being visited isn't being altered. Since 4chan often is highly sensitive and https://4chan.org already works I can't see any reason to why it isn't the default. You guys have any idea?
>>54594552
This begs the question as to why https isn't on by default for you.
Should be, are you using 4chan x? If not check the native extension
https seems to be rate limited compared to http though, maybe they only cache http at cloudflare.
Why are people critical of what OS, software or hardware others use? It's like two serfs arguing over which of them has the shiniest chains
>Intel vs. AMD
>Windows vs. OS X vs. Linux
>Android vs. iOS
>phone brand vs. identical phone brand
In reality, there are only two teams in existence: the suckers who spend money and the winners who make money.
>>54594544
In reality, there is only one group: Suckers.
Hope that helps.
>>54594544
YES YES OH GOD YES
Finally somebody gets it and doesn't just argue about this shit. I'm so done with /g/ just shitposting about which product is better instead of actually doing something cool. Fucking 4chan
>>54594544
I never thought about it because I don't even talk with people who are like that, but you have a good point.
Old: >>54582728
>>54594458
can /g/ do my homework for me?
Do these actually do anything?
>>54594474
Yes.
>>54594491
No.
>panic
I always have the same node also sometimes it gives me a long address with X n shit telling me that i'm not using Tor.
here so when this happen i just restart tor obviously but i wonder why it happen.
Are you trolling or just retarded?
You are using the tor browser?
Hello
Did anyone here work with SimpleCV before ?
I've made a robot and equipped it with a camera.
I want to make it follow a certain object around.
For example if the object is to the left the robot should turn to the left to face it. If it's too far it should advance towards it and so on.
How do I go about detecting the position of the object on the image and its size. The size doesn't have to be exact, just enough to tell the robot to advance or go backwards
>>54594382
Mine does never look this good.
>>54594382
You do http://docs.opencv.org/2.4/doc/tutorials/imgproc/histograms/template_matching/template_matching.html
If the object is simple you can use Hough transform.
If you have a lot of photos of your object you can train classifier. This is the most universal approach.
>>54596563
that's in C++, I've already implemented the communication using python.
This thread is about the appreciation of watches, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that is required to make a fine watch.
Required viewing for newbies:
http://youtu.be/508-rmdY4jQ [Embed] [Open]
Strap guide:
http://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
Previous thread:
>>>>54569096
>>54594305
1st for NO TRIPFAGS
First for quality divers.
1st for best G-Shock.
Is it possible to make a botnet out of smartphones?
What you think Google and Apple are doing?
