http://aattp.org/special-ed-student-who-recorded-bullies-tormenting-him-accused-of-felony-wiretapping/
I remember the old /b/ when we would do something about this please don't let me down
Pic unrelated
>>541824081
And you're doing what for the cause?
wat the mother fuck.
please please please tell me this is fake.
since when is a school a place of "expected privacy" if at the same time kissing and sexual things are "publid displays of affection"
>>541824081
This is fucked up. We must do something.
Guys what do to her.
>>541840589
Treat her to a lovely meal at a nice restaurant
Deport her
>>541840701
This. She's cute as hell.
wouldholdhandswith/10
Need more loli!
>>541836813
That explains the baby angels in paintings
post some if you want some, that's how it works
Roll for your filipina GF
I'd rather not...
I think they're ugly besides 1 or 2 of them. Why are asians usually so damn ugly?
>>541806218
just roll dude
She fucked with my head for a year and a half. She's an attention whore too
>>541831742
Will?
rape her instead
/thread
gotta go, my phone is about to die
heres dillon the hackers address
720 N93rd St
Mesa, AZ 85207
confirmed here - https://twitter.com/DillonTheHacker/status/454719052548964352
Have fun /b/
>>541812823
we should order pizzas, does anyone know how to call internationally for free
>>541813475
i'm using the domino's website
>>541813475
Make multiple Skype accounts? You have like a free 2 minutes or some shit with Skype right? That's more than enough for a pizza order if you do it quick enough.
Ask a guy who has a non-sexual but friendly and affectionate relationship with an Asian girl anything
>>541814327
post pics
>>541814391
form of a question
image hit limit on last thread so next loll thread GO
>>541819684
nice spelling genius
>>541817556
>>541819981
I'd imagine doing so will lead me to break the internet for everyone
I've had a hard day, maybe a loli thread will help cheer me up
The loli train never stops.
Once you pop you can't stop.
Previously on The Walking Loli
>>541725075
I have a tale I’d like to relate, if you’re keen. It’s wincest, and comes in two parts (parts, not posts)
>>541801710
please don't
unless it's OC, then go ahead by all means
>>541801856
I should say so. I just finished typing it up
It's not greentext either. I could never get on with that
>>541802008
Proceed sir.
creep shots !
>>541748076
That's so hot. It's Cinderella. I think Disney should use this picture to advertise.
self bumb
common wanna expand my folder /b/
>Tl;dr Women are generally delusional about the way markets work, and any evidence to the contrary is dismissed on the spot. They have virtually no ambition and complain about statistics that they don’t bother to fact-check or try to understand.
I’m a Resident Advisor at my university and a member of the Social and Education Committee and FEA. I graduate in less than a month with two Summa Cum Laude degrees in Economics and Political Science.
Resident Advisors get a stack of fliers every week that we are expected to pin to our...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I realize that it isn’t everyone’s fault that they don’t know about gender economics. With Obama and every news outlet in the country spouting the 77% statistic, it’s a wonder anyone knows the truth about gender pay. I decide that, given my soon-to-be credentials and position in my committee and Finance and Economics Association, I could prepare a presentation and lecture to educate people on the issue.
I prepare an event with reputable scholarly articles, references available for fact-checking, and I break down the misconceptions in a reasonable manner—all the while keeping the presentation very pro-women. It addresses the fact that the 77% is a mean-ratio and doesn’t control for education, experience, or even occupation. It addresses that when controlled for this, women actually make about 98% what men make. It also addressed the social reasons why men generally occupy higher paying fields and why this is a problem, and how it can be remedied.
I took the presentation to my committee chair. He told me that it would be inappropriate to contradict the other event since Student Housing already endorsed it. If I was to go forward, I would have to go to the Women’s Resource Center and receive permission, as well as speak to the President of Housing and ask if I can present this controversial material and risk branding the association as prejudiced.
I thought: “Hey, this is okay. If the Women’s Resource Center likes my presentation, they may endorse my event.”
>cont.
I go to the Women’s Resource Center (WRC). The first thing I address is the cost of their event. Is it free to everybody, or just women? If it’s not free to me, how much does it cost?
>It’s free to everyone, but we are marketing to women. It’s an advertising strategy.
Okay. I tell them my predicament but not that my event might contradict theirs. I ask if they can provide me with the works cited for the information in their lecture so I can add some of it to my own, or avoid sending mixed messages.
>We...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I get an email from them two days later. The email has the website I asked for: www.wageproject.org
I go to the website to do some fact-hounding. I find absolutely no cited sources. None. They put one link at the bottom of some graphics: “U.S. Census Data on Women’s Wages”. I click on it; it’s a dead link. This site is complete shit. I do find this, though:
>women’s work is consistently paid less than men’s work
>Are janitors really worth more than nurses’ aides, parking lot attendants more than...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
anyone have the set?
monitorin
>>541738996
Lurkin
bump, i can post the uncensored versions of whatever you can post
YLYL THREAD HARDMODE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XALVTzMOeQ
