>new military thing is designed
"wow this thing is fucking gay and will never work"
>new military thing is built
"wow this thing is fucking gay and has so many problems"
>new military thing is fielded
"wow this thing is fucking gay"
>new military thing is designed to replace old military thing
"wow this thing is fucking gay and will never do as good a job as the old military thing"
>>29219595
>>29219595
>old military thing shows up in store
"hey guys check out my new milsurp"
>>29219620
It's true, but that doesn't mean that anyone, including grunts, officers, and engineers, can accurately predict what weapons are going to actually be important.
Wich one does /k/ prefer ?
>>29219554
14 seems to work better.
The ar15.
>>29219554
14
>>29219575
wrong thread you faggot
Is it possible to store personal firearms at the range? My super-depressed friend wants a moist nugget but wants to keep it at the range/gun club.
>>29219534
Only for Europoors. Storing a gun at the range is the same fucking thing as renting the same gun every time you go to the range. He either wants to defend his home from Jamal or he don't
>>29219534
I think some ranges allow it.
>>29219564
Renting ends up being much more expensive in the long run.
>>29219831
The difference between paying for sex and sex for free is paying for it is cheaper.
I've been looking into getting a new HD gun and everybody keeps telling me to get an AR15. problem is, I'm worried about over penetration and accidentally shooting my neighbors if I ever have to use it. So, I was wondering, is there any good 5.56 to mitigate this? alternatively I've been considering getting a PCC in .45ACP with a magazine capacity of around 30rnds. kinda limited on options for that though that aren't crap or stupid expensive.
pic kinda related. what I'm actually considering for a 5.56 HD gun.
>>29219014
Yeah, the aug has magic bullet-altering properties that prevent 5.56 over penetration.
Because dangerous overpenetration in HD isnt a complete meme
>>29219058
Not everyone lives in rural areas or houses.
>>29219014
What makes you think an AUG won't overpenetrate but an AR15 will? Plus 5.56 hollowpoints will probably be fine.
Sup /k/ommandos
On Tuesday I was on my trash-picking route when I picked up some boxes that contained over $5000 worth of skin creams and ointments.
What kind of guns do you think I can trade them for? Maybe I can get like 10 Glocks or 2 AR-15s lmao
What are your thoughts?
Just rub it all on your dick
>>29218869
An Colt SP-1 and 8000 rounds of ammo
>>29218869
The people that use high end skin creams are typically not the type of people interested in having firearms.
All in all, I suggest you just rub it all on your dick.
Now this is a kraut killing kit
>>29218493
>tfw no slav removal kit
>>29218493
And this is all I need to get rid of some resistance.
>>29218634
I'm not fight Slav
>>29218680
You got BTFO out of my nation
If Helium had been easier to mass produce, would we have had more airships in WWI-WWII?
>>29217862
The US actually used a hella of a lot of blimps in WW2 and the brits used loads in WW1
>>29217862
>>29217886
brits used a lot of blimps during the blitz as passive AA
>>29217862
Maybe. The trouble with blimps is that all you have to do is load up your fighters with incendiary and the whole thing goes up like kindling.
are there any rifles in canada that are nonretricted, but can take ar 15 parts (trigger, charging handle, mag, grip, stock, guard, bolt carrier group, barrel)?
as far as i understand, the law states that if it can take an AR 15 upper then it's restricted. but are there non ar 15 uppers...that take ar 15 components? i mean, what if the armory made their in house parts but it happened to support ars by "sheer coincidence"? can the government still designate it as such?
pic unrelated. probably a famas.
>>29217850
Alberta Tactical Rifle has an AR-10 clone witj proproetary receivers that is non restricted called the Modern Hunter
Average about $4000 based on options
Theyre also release a new rifle this spring called Modern Varminter in .223 Wylde. Same concept it will be nom restricted. Base cost is 3500 on preorder rigjt now.
NORTH EASTERN ARMS has an ar 10 clone being examined by rcmp right nownfor classification. Theure hoping NR.
Likely 1500$
You can an AR 180B But not worth the price...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>29218075
welp time to move to murrica. which state is the best?
>>29218321
Vermont is based I hear.
Why do people who like guns wear cargo shorts as well?
They're common, not special snowflake tier, and cheap.
>>29217819
Because they're comfortable and easy to wear
Hey /k/, this is a bit /diy/ but I believe it's still best to ask here.
I need affordable storage for my guns, it's gotten out of hand, I kept buying shit whenever I could get a good deal during sales and shit, but these guns are everywhere. I sleep on the fucking couch because it takes too long to move them all elsewhere.
I'm looking for an affordable way to store them so that they take up less space.
I think the best way for me would be to have a setup that has them leaning against a rack side by side.
Any good things I could alter to turn it something...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>29217788
a fucking safe
If you have that many guns then there is no reason not to get a good safe.
>>29217788
buy 50 gun socks and throw them bitches under the bed.
Hope you never get broken into.
It's cute but is it worth $5,000?
no , you can buy 25 sks's with that money
>>29217576
I wouldn't mind at all if this thread just became
An SRS is worth X amount of Y rifle.
>>29217565
Do they have a hydraulic trigger?
Autistic question here, is the recoil in Counterstrike Global Offensive "realistic"? Or is it way way more than real recoil? Or is it less, and real recoil is actually far more unforgiving?
I'm just curious because I see all this stuff about how automatic fire is almost never used by US soldiers and I wonder if there is even any point to it being on firearms at all anymore.
Also general questions thread for retards like me.
the ballistic dont compare to the fire mode and the "hipfire" in cs
>>29217253
Dunno much about the recoil of other guns besides my WASR but from the look of the muzzle break I'd say GO is right about how an un-sighted AKM would travel in it's select fire mode.
I just picked up an SKS and the magazine has about an 1/8th of an inch play left and right on the magazine (very slight wiggle). I just picked it up and haven't taken it out to the range yet.
Is that a normal thing for the SKS? This is my first one.
Hi /k/. Noguns here but I want to start. My question is, is a Nugget just a meme at this point or is it worth purchasing one?
First, stop being a cunt.
Why are you purchasing a firearm?
Target shooting?
Hunting?
Home defense?
Or is it just a [spoiler]meme?
The nugget is (by now) overpriced for what you get. Its fun, its loud, its indestructible, and it was used to defend Mother Russia from decades of enemies.
Now git
It's a good gun, and still decent boom for your buck but there are better choices now that prices have gone up.
Get an SKS.
>>29217184
Probably for target shooting and if shit ever hits the fan I will have an emergency gun.
What is it?
Isn't that a blyat?
>>29217152
An old fucking thread
>>29217152
A clipazine
Is it worth buying an expensive magnifier? The prices range all over the place. All they are are just little monoculars with pic rails. Anyone have experience with a cheapo vs an expensive one?
Magnifiers are shit, regardless of how much you pay.
I have the exact magnifier in your OP and it was... Okay, I guess. I had it set up with an aimpoint PRO But I don't think it alligned perfectly with the RDS. It felt cheap like it would break if it ever got hit by something. The finish wasn't that great. I think you'd be better off with either getting just a dot sight or a magnified optic. Or maybe even a variable maginified optic. I got a Vortex Strike Eagle eventually and it seems decent enough. I also know it's tough because I dropped a couple nuggets on it by accident.
I wish I'd been able...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>29216925
care to elaborate?