Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 658. page
- Home
- Board: /k/ - Weapons
- Reading: Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 658. page
What went wrong?
>>29754774
No good replacer when it got old.
>>29754774
The same as with every knock off.
But still, the best T-72 variant is M-84.
It was produced 1971 as a low cost MBT.
Anyone have any experience with this thing?
lol that bitch looks so thick, I thought it was supposed to be boolitproof.
>ROTHCO
>>29754743
looks kinda comfy...
Tfw I will never operate because I was prescribed anxiety and depression meds in the past
Tfw 23 year old going nowhere in life
>>29754731
Volunteer and go to Syria, fight for the Kurds.
so do something about it
>>29754744
>>29754731
Or just fucking lie and join anyways
First there was the 1887
then the Adler a110
then the Pardus
a couple of days ago the Uzkon
now there is Alpharms
https://www.cleaverfirearms.com/Products.aspx…
what the actual fuck turkey, they are cramming all these lever actions down the Australian throats
Australia is like an alternate reality now, where lever actions became dominant over pump actions
well there is a few snazzy pump action rifles being released this year.
Dont forget the IAC, and the Marlin 336 .410.
brings the total to 7.
>>29754661
the IAC I'd just call the 1887
and yes technically the marlin is, although there are a few .410 lever shotguns
bumping.
Can we put a ban on things this ugly entering service?
Like what the fuck were they even thinking
What the fuck is this shit
>>29754531
What purpose does it even serve?
As far as machine guns go, is it better to have a very high cyclic rate of fire like the MG-42 or a slower one like the BAR?
>>29754526
Somewhere in between so you are creating a denser field of fire but not blowing through your ammo at an astronomical rate.
>>29754526
depends on the situation.
ideally you want something with a moderate cyclic like a 240B or M60.
but if you were dealing with hordes of enemy from a guarded position where you could deal with barrel changes, high cyclic like an MG42 would be great.
but if you're unable to deal with barrel changes, jams, etc, you want a lower cyclic to reduce the chance of that happening.
>>29754526
depends on what you're planning to do with it
Be honest /k/, how often do you entertain the inner child in you by pretend-room clearing your house?
>>29754265
>Pretend room clearing.
>Not going fully armed, ready to kill any nigger or school bus full of children you find in, on or near your home.
This isn't a game, motherfucker.
>tfw fighting off the impulse on buying a rail, sling and building a scoutlight for my ar just to do this
>>29754302
a-anon that's spooky
AUSTRALIA THREAD
PORT ARTHUR 20TH SHITSTORM EDITION
If you haven't yet:
>Go join Australian National Firearms Lobby on Facebook
>Go give Firearms Owners United a like
What guns have you bought - where are you shooting this weekend - how are we going to be fucked by the meeting tomorrow
Also: There is legitimately a conspiracy between all the media outlets in Australia, Walter Mikac, GCA Australia and other organisations.
It all makes sense now
>>29754212
Nofuns from Brisbane, looking at doing my safety course this weekend.
I mean of course the media outlets, politicians and general uneducated unwashed masses read from the same bullshit anti textbook, but do you mean anything specific when you say "legitimate conspiracy"?
>>29754212
Got my licence and pta coming back soon. Wanna get the high powered semiauto death machine 12g lever action
Who knew the Australians actually knew how to make good guns?
>>29754176
>Austrians
Yeah, they're kinda underated in the world. The M95 was pretty revolutionary
>>29754176
>australi
>good
>anything
>>29754195
are you off your medicine or just stupid
What's /k/'s opinion on the Bursa Thunder?
I'm thinking of getting my first handgun and I'm really loving that it doesn't have a synthetic grip like some topheavy glock, it feels really ergonomic and doesn't have a really bad snap recoil.
Cons are the 380 ammo which I've heard bad things about, also has some safety features like it won't shoot without a magazine in. Idk why this is a bad thing though.
It has a lifetime factory warrenty but a lot of people already do that, and the factory is in Argentina so I'm not so impressed at the idea of nigger engineering.
But fucking christ, $250 for this makes it really tempting
>>29754103
I keep one in in my truck and at work with me, solid little gun. Never had any issues with it, but yea .380 is a bit of a shitter. Of course a mag of hollow points from whatever caliber is going to ruin anyone's day.
>>29754103
I own quite a few quality firearms and I still want one of those guido black and gold ones
you get what you pay for. Ask your local gunsmith what he thinks of Bersa Thunders and he'll laugh you out of the building.
Any recommendations on finishing my project/slug-blaster 870? Things I still need to address.......
1) A way to raise the cheekweld, that does not interfere with the reciprocating stock.
2) Lowest-possible-profile picatinny Iron sights. I didn't think these would be hard to find. I was wrong. (was hoping for a way to add picatinny 3-dot / simple pistol sights, but that's not a thing I guess....)
3) A way to make the LER-Scope work, with said ironsights. Preferably without using a quick-detach or related method. I'd like to use both/either. Not necessarily cowitness (obviously), but co-usefullness without user-intervention.
4. Sling and sling mount. Not a big deal, but i'd love to hear what you use / what you like.
....Oh, and i'm not changing the foregrip. Handmade/walnut, and I love it.
>>29754000
Get a cheek riser, they are under $20 for synthetic fabric.
You may have to have something made. I needed elevated Picatinny mounted beads once and had to make them.
You don't have a lot of options but maybe a McCann would do something for you.
http://mccann(removethis)industries.com/product-line/mounts/fors-mount/
>Knoxx spring loaded stock that slaps your cheek with every shot and belongs in the garbage
>not even a Monte Carlo design for proper scope height
>wants a cheek riser that doesn't absorb recoil
>wants ironsights that don't block a scope
>a scope that's on ultra-low rings already
>my face when all these things that don't work for a reason
Anon...
Ditch the Knoxx garbage, get a Monte Carlo slug stock or the Magpul if you want plastic fantastic tacticool, and put some 45 degree iron sights on it if you absolutely positively need iron sights that don't involve moving the scope.
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/631596
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/565670
https://www.magpul.com/products/mbus-pro-offset-sight-rear
https://www.magpul.com/products/mbus-pro-offset-sight-front
>>29754149
That's what i was initially thinking.
Then I put my 45 degree angled iron sights on it.
Then I realized how idiotic of an idea it was.
Naw dude, 3" slugs kick a little too hard to handle at 45 degrees.
So, the Croats have this recoilless anti-materiel rifle using a venturi tube.
Why the fuck don't they make an infantry rifle like this? Imagine 308 with the recoil of 9mm.
If you have to use it in tight quarters, just close the junction and use it like a regular rifle.
>>29753922
1. too large and heavy
2. recoil isn't that big of a burden
>screeching
>>29753934
>"recoil isn't that big of a burden"
>what are follow up shots
>what are lmgs
>what are "9mm vs 40" threads
>what are "223 vs Grendel vs 308" threads
What does /k/ think about the Thompson?
1928 is objectively the sexiest gun ever made by humans.
I jerk off to it daily.
>>29753770
It's heavy as FUCK. Besides that, it's a neat design that works alright.
Who AZ here? Glendale/West Phoenix checking in.
tucson here
Moved to AZ and have been settling in. Tragically, I haven't fired a shot in 6 months.
Question. Is guerilla warfare outdated the way anti gun types say it is?
Even in Vietnam the NVA backed the Vietnamese guerillas and the USA was winning by every conceivable measure. The only reason Vietnam ended as a stalemate was because President Nixon was impeached and the democrat dominated government voted to pull out before the NVA could surrender during the Paris peace talks.
Nowadays there are even greater challenges to modern guerilla groups.
>Modern 1st world militaries have GPS they can spy on you with
>Modern 1st world militaries have drones you can't even see nor hear, and they can destroy a whole city block with one payload if they wanted
>camouflage won't fool an attack helicopter that can spot you with FLIR from several miles away
>most modern 1st world civilians have very little will to stand up to their government by writing petitions let alone have the testicular fortitude to take up arms
It seems as though guerilla warfare is outdated and almost completely out of the question, as in the 2A literally can not save an armed population against a government like the US Gov't anymore.
Any thoughts?
Guerilla Warfare will always be a viable until we figure out a way to glass entire planets 40k style.
>>29753498
this
>>29753479
>Question. Is guerilla warfare outdated the way anti gun types say it is?
It's more effective than ever because modern nations are unwilling to use effective tactics against it.
The British had tremendous success against guerrilla ans unconventional armies for centuries.
>The only reason Vietnam ended as a stalemate was because President Nixon was impeached and the democrat dominated government voted to pull out before the NVA could surrender during the Paris peace talks.
You're half right.
The North signed the peace agreement before Nixon was impeached.
The Democrats cut all aid to the South, and were obviously opposed to lifting a finger to helo them, which allowed the communist backed North to attack again and claim victory after an initial defeat.
>>Modern 1st world militaries have GPS they can spy on you with
I think you mean drones and such, not gps.
>>Modern 1st world militaries have drones you can't even see nor hear, and they can destroy a whole city block with one payload if they wanted
Unfortunately nobody is willing to do that, under the misguided belief that inflicting civilian casualties has magically become evil and immoral in the last 50 years.
>>camouflage won't fool an attack helicopter that can spot you with FLIR from several miles away
True.
>>most modern 1st world civilians have very little will to stand up to their government by writing petitions let alone have the testicular fortitude to take up arms
Only a very small percentage of them would need to actually fight in order to seriously compromise a government's control of the people.
![rt20_1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/dZF1LUB.jpg "rt20 1[1]")
