Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1008. page
- Home
- Board: /k/ - Weapons
- Reading: Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1008. page
In terms of actually having an effect on the air war, what was the greatest aircraft of WWII?
>>28661426
ur mum's underwear after the elastic broke and they went flying.
>>28661426
likely a cargo plane. just like on land, the big truck moving shit to the front lines is what keeps the war machine going
C47.
So /k/ I come to you with a question. I'm in the market for a 6 inch 357 magnum revolver and have narrowed it down to the Ruger GP100 and the S&W 686+. I like both, but I'm leaning towards the S&W because it seems more refined and has an extra shot. What I'm worried about is that damn "Hillary Hole" on the smith. I've only heard of the lock failing once and that wasn't even proved it was the lock in the first place. Am I worried about nothing or should I just stick to the ruger? I'm also looking at the GP100 Match Champion but that's a 4 inch and I'm really wanting a 6 inch to utilize that 357 goodness better. So which one is best in your opinion?
>>28661335
Personally I lean towards Ruger.
>cheaper
>insanely durable
>lots of insurance for retard-tier handloads
>no HH
>much simpler internals, you can actually take it apart in the field
Downsides.
>Slightly heavier.
>Not as polished, but that's perfectly fixable.
Personally I have a Security Six and I have in fact once taken it apart using only a dime.
>>28661409
Seconded. It's the closest thing to indestructible you can get with a functional firearm.
>>28661409
Good points, Ruger's customer support is top notch. I also like how easy it is to change the front sight to whatever you like. The price is also more attractive but not really an issue. That 6 inch GP100 is certainly a looker too in its own right. Fuck I wish S&W did away with those fucking locks.
why are some gun owners complete autists?
anyone got anymore stuff like this?
>>28661307
>restricting your sales to LE, Mil, and first responders
>for a fucking S&W Shield
>muh privilege
>muh secret clubs
>muh circlejerks and pity parties
>>28661329
it was a pawn shop located nowhere near a military base trying to sell it, they were also asking 500..for a shield.
When deployed overseas, did you get to interact with local women?
Share stories anons.
>>28661182
I went on raves in Germany. I probably got a lot of pussy judging by how often it burned when I peed, but I remember little of it. In the middle east "fraternization" was a court's marital offense, but it happened enough to other people. I wasn't gonna risk it though, because I was kinda "that guy" and was under scrutiny for other reasons.
>>28661235
>but it happened enough to other people.
Where?
>>28661182
If you have a thick beard and a pissed off look yeah the Sadie women would be all over you but if you have a clean shaved face and a "please give me sympathy" look then no the Sadie women would not want to be near you.
Source: my beard told me.
Would you an integrally suppressed handgun?
Not unless NFA gets repealed. Fuck paying a suppressor stamp that can't be used on any other firearm.
>>28660840
Can you english?
>>28660840
i want a VSS a lot more
Does anyone have a screencap of the thread where a /k/omanndo unboxes PP19 parts from Russia?
Also Russian subgun general I guess.
Contributing
>>28660808
Pretty sure that was Zasta, don't have the caps though
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
MWAP MWAP MWAP MWAAAAPP
MAWP
>>28660796
WHAT? I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
Does /k/ even lift? How do you expect to fighting against the gubbermint when they come to take your guns, or go fight terrorists alongside your qt3.14 Kurdish waifu, if you can't climb a flight of stairs without gasping for air?
Post routines and stats. Current .mil gladly welcome.
>inb4 go back to /fit/
290 APFT, run 3x/week, ruck 2x, lift 4x
>>28660323
>rucking
Enjoy your early onset arthritis
>>28660323
If someone can not do 30 pull ups they have no reason to lift. They have not even mastered their body weight.
>>28660323
I browse /fit/ it's the same as working out
I did the thing edition
Blizzard 2k16 edition
>>28660203
$27 moneys
>>28660217
Still hoping the snow didn't delay this and the stuff from Cadet
Does USS Virginia still hold the most advanced submarine so far?
What about those fairly new Bong ones?
>>28659538
So there's a submarine inside there, huh?
> Yo dawg, we heard you liked submarines
>>28659538
So if I take the USS Virginia off, will I find the most advanced submarine under it?
Should i sell my sks and buy a WASR 10?
>>28658488
No. Keep your sks. At least it was assembled properly and isn't complete shit.
>>28658510
>>28658524
You'll regret it. Just save up and buy a vepr, why a wasr anyway?
anyone knoww the status of the /k/ommandos from this night?
Nah, but I'll bump in case somebody does. Last I heard saiga was in court.
>>28658357
backround please?
>>28658370
just look up saiga marine and black powder ranger
I feel I'm in moderate shape. Could always improve, but not a weakling. Was thinking a good way to improve my health was to take up a fighting style. After lurking for a while, people seem to really favor grappling on the basis of getting your opponent on the ground right off the bat. But any other suggestions?
Kicking, screaming, urinating on yourself while using pregnant woman as shields
Boxing, MMA, JKD, Muay Thai, and some others I'm forgetting.
Any form of fighting is usually effective as long as it's employed by a tough, fit, and knowledgeable individual.
I am not a tier-0 ninja operator, so I guess take what I type with that in mind. Though at least I'm being up front about it.
I have been in a couple of real fights. Not lifetime fighter melee champ, but hey, more than zero fights in my life.
I have a little bit of background with grappling trianing. But honestly, that has gone out the window in my fights where they quickly turned very sloppy.
I think the absolute number one thing to do to prepare for a hand to hand fight is just to get strong. Lift and get big. Get stronger than anybody likely to try and start some stupid fight against you. Sure in an ideal world for your opponent, they could use some advanced leverage technique and beat you, but most likely if you ever do get in a fight it won't be against somebody who is a master of technique.
I've had somebody play around and think he could fight because he was a non-lifter who was moderately skilled in some fighting style. He tried some leverage technique on me and I was able to just push him over. It might be a dummy fighting style, but pushing down people weaker than you works.
Thoughts on face shields integrated into helmets? While yes goggles do the same thing, perhaps a faceplate with a low ballistic rating and simple dust filters that seal around your face could be useful inna desert/breaching/etc. post examples real or imagined
>>28657296
Nother
>>28657296
>Having worked manual labor and use angle grinders, I can say a face shield definitely is an improvement over just safety glasses but that's just my opinion
Wew that's a whole lotta targets there all in one place.
Be a real shame if somebody blow them up.
>>28657218
I'd like to see you try.
Good fucking luck
>>28657218
good luck steaming to an inlet on one of the two coasts
