What does /ic/ thinks of Gerhard Richter's work?
Roll only if you have at least half an hour to work on you roll and post it. Do not reroll, flex those creative muscles.
If you want to escape /ic/'s slow post count, use a random number generator such as random.org or randomnumbergenerator.com
I'm still learning the basics but here we go.
Rull
>>2416807
sure, why not.
>>2416976
>an elaborate hairstyle
Hair, my one true weakness.
It's been a while since I've actually drawn anything. What the hell did I do wrong?
stop spamming this
>>2453162
it's really good , I like it
Anyone have any tips for drawing anatomy? Even when the proportions look equal and correct I struggle to draw figures with the casual slouch that we naturally have, and people end up looking as stiff as a board. Any trained/talented artists have advice?
The only advice that matters is the same for all these retarded "how I do dis?" threads. Practice, a fuck ton.
It's not what you lazy assholes want to hear but that's what works. If you don't spend the time doing the studies (Drawing figures from life/photos) to understanding what the fuck you're drawing no amount of tips or tricks will help you. It's a trained skill and the only way to get your figures to look good is to spend tons of hours drawing them badly and slowly making improvements until they're good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsxm4mUjf4w
thank yer models kids
Fantastic
oh I love that film, thank you for posting.
but I gotta say, the style is Sheridan College all over the place and I am not sure if this is a good thing. I am wondering what would have become of the artist without the disney flavour.
This is the best work I've seen in years. Thanks for posting.
I like the style
artwork your never going to finish thread
i did this one in adobe during my highschool art class
post all of your unfished works
>>2453720
It would look nicer if it wasn't so compressed, you should redo it some day
>>2453721
haha, its not compressed. i was going for a "pixel art" kinda vibe
guess it didint come off like that
>>2453722
I'm sure if it had been finished the pixel art look would have come through.
Drawing I SFUCKING IMPOSSIBLE
HOW DO YOU PEOPLE FUCKING DO IT
I"VE BEEN READING ALL THOSE HOW TO DRAW BOOKS AND IT AINT WOKRING
>>2446081
>I"VE BEEN READING
cool, now draw diligently for a couple of years
>>2446081
Try doing what you see on each page instead of reading them.
I would recommend to start with a real book like Scott Robertson - How to Draw (not now to draw on the left half of your ass) after that you will be ready to start studying humans by Michael Hampton.
I'm so sorry Pianorei. It shouldn't have been like this.
How the hell does this happen? How can one artist dig themselves into such a shit hole.
Also, general confusing artist change thread.
>>2453605
was this drawn by adolf?
>>2453605
They are two completely different styles, not surprising when switching to a new style you're shit until you get good at it.
didn't think this was something anyone needed to be told.
>>2453616
> muh style
no, this is what happens when you go mango and banana first before Loomis. If you can Loomis then style shouldn't even be an issue. Just observe and memorize the proportions and grind and you'll be gud. Like those Japanese animators or assistants that can master a new style quickly? yeah they got the eye.
My drawing please comment
It's shit.
>>2452842
blog?
>>2452842
Loomis.
How do I achieve shading like pic related? Is this some kind of crosshatching?
http://keimeguro.com/
A link to his website if it helps. He does say he uses photoshop in his FAQ but only to clean up smudges. Can I still achieve the shading traditionally?
>>2452798
Light straight hatching, maybe smoothed with a tortillon. I'd guess.
>>2452792
If you look close (zoom in if it helps) you'll see the drawstrokes.
There's no magic at play here, he's just using very light strokes and the direction of them lways follows the form of the subject, and he's obviously very skilled at it. Read Loomis, he explains all of this.
It should be possible to do this with pencils in fact it looks like pencils to me.
Let's have a t/3/apots lewd thread since such things aren't allowed on /3/.
>>2438663
We don't treat photobashers kindly around here, fuck off back to /3/
>>2438676
its already too late /3/ has invaded
Original thread: https://warosu.org/ic/thread/2453215
Is an objective art necessary, or simply a outdated remnant of a centralized Modernist society?
>>2453486
Meant Braque, but it's actually a Picasso. The other is a Gris, he BTFO of Picasso in terms of colour.
>>2453487
The problem is subjectivity. See Postmoderism, what is good is a fractured mess dependent on your life. There is no one context, we don't have an institution say this is good art, nor any rules to break. PM despair is a bitch. Art is dead! Objectivity is dead, all is equal, Chumbum is God.
But we can't have one objective art, without a collective goal to work towards we make little progress and repeat ourselves. A centralized art is doomed and necessary. See Postpostmoderism or Metamodernism for a restructuring of Art.
>Art must look good!
https://chunhuacatherinedong.wordpress.com/2015/06/07/art-must-be-expensive-shame-shame-shame/
Image is a spring landscape
Finest of taste or generic junk of shit?
I'm making a go fund me where I'm going to turn some 5x7 mermaid art into postcard prints for $5 backers. I'veneverscannedwiththeideatoprintthough and I'm nervous/scared.
I scan it in at 600 dpi? Is that necessary?
Is really all I need to do is just play with the contrast?
>>2451980
are you popular? that's all that matters.
>>2452004
I have no doubt that I will be able to sell 250 prints matched with my current financial situation, and my art is kitchy cute, so. Let's say "sure".
How should I edit the art for a print? Let's say vista print?
>>2451980
Scan at whatever the max optical (not interpolated) resolution of the scanner is, and then resize the file to whatever size and resolution your output is going to be. You shouldn't do more than fix contrast and color / saturation depending on the quality of your scanner; maybe reduce noise and sharpen a bit since prints tend to come out a little softer than the digital image.
There is a '.locky' virus floating around now that will encrypt all your files. It just fucked my shit up and I lost all my precious photos on the :C drive and it started making it's way on my external. Luckily it didn't cause too much damage since I plugged it out when I quickly noticed it. (My gave saved files are locked though).
Remember to BACK-UP your files! And always have a proper AV software installed!
>>2453296
Thanks for the heads up, but did you really open up an "invoice" microsoft word attachment from an unknown source?
>>2453296
how did you catch it? that's pretty scary senpai
If you're smart then this notice will not apply to you because you will be smart and not retarded
