Archived threads in /x/ - Paranormal - 983. page
- Home
- Board: /x/ - Paranormal
- Reading: Archived threads in /x/ - Paranormal - 983. page
Midnight in the Desert with Art Bell
http://artbell.com/
Streaming Links:
http://live.darkmatterdigitalnetwork.com/darkmatter.mp3
http://live.darkmatterdigitalnetwork.com/darkmatter.aac
Popup Player: http://player.streamguys.com/dmr/sgplayer/player.php
Friday, October 23skiddoo, 2015 9PM-12AM PST/12AM-3AM EST
OPEN LINES FRIDAY
CALL-IN
Telephone: 1 (952) 225-5278 (CALL-ART)
Skype: MITD51 (US/CAN)
Skype: MITD55 (Overseas)
Who will be first to call in and not embarrass themselves?
>>16882502
Have there been any good shows this week? I haven't been around.
>>16882507
are you kidding? wednesday night someone shot up his house dude.
It was majestic- see if you can pull it up in the archive
>>16882502
does anyone plan on calling in tonight?
Have you seen the light /x/? The Truth is out there if you seek it
There is ample evidence if just look enough /x/
>>16851539
Ive heard about it and saved some pictures as reference, can you tell me a bit more?
>>16851539
Unfortunately, this is all bullshit. While this stuff makes for fun steakpunk fantasy fiction, there is no science behind any of it.
Midnight in the Desert with Art Bell
http://artbell.com/
Streaming Links:
http://live.darkmatterdigitalnetwork.com/darkmatter.mp3
http://live.darkmatterdigitalnetwork.com/darkmatter.aac
Popup Player: http://player.streamguys.com/dmr/sgplayer/player.php
Wednesday, October 21st, 2015 9PM-12AM PST/12AM-3AM EST
http://artbell.com/wed-oct-21-dr-william-forstchen/
Dr. William R. Forstchen has a Ph.D. in history from Purdue University with specializations in military history and the history of technology. He is the author of over forty books, a number of them NYT best sellers. His book about the threat to the United States by use of an Electro-Magnetic Pulse was on the best seller list for twelve weeks and is credited with helping to start the Prepper movement. Forstchen is a professor of history and faculty fellow at Montreat College in Western North Carolina.
CALL-IN
Telephone: 1 (952) 225-5278 (CALL-ART)
Skype: MITD51 (US/CAN)
Skype: MITD55 (Overseas)
Here for dat dank bumper music fam
why does bellgab hate hoggie?
shit i was waiting for this thread, started to make one myself.
An introduction to Individual Philosophy, by means of the spoken or written word, is an interpretation, a particular human being according to the particular experience of that being.
A speaker or writer makes a particular interpretation born of his particular experience, translating that experience into words as best he can.
The listener or reader makes a particular interpretation of the original interpretation according to his particular experience.
At the level of sensory perceived objects, those particular interpretations, for the purpose of communication in the sensorily perceived world, apparently coincide.
Hence, when the word "bread" is used, two persons speaking the same acquired language, visualize a similar object. At this level, with variable efficiency, the human being, as a sensorily perceived object, functions in relation to all other objects in the sensorily perceived world. But, at a level other than that of the sensorily perceived world, there can be no certainty that interpretations do coincide.
For example, when the word "Consciousness" is used it is not possible for one person to convey to another exactly what he (inwardly) experiences as consciousness. Each must realise for himself what such a word means in his own experience. One can give another bread; one cannot give another consciousness.
One person cannot tell another what consciousness is because of the limitations of spoken and written word. The impossibility arises from the fact that, in order to describe an abstract experience, abstract words have to be used (abstract here meaning that which is other than sebsirily perceived or described in terms of senoriliy perceived world). And how could it be possible to define the abstract words needed in order to define the abstract?
Consciousness cannot be defined nor described because it does not have the properties and limitations of a sensorily perceived object . It is not possible to describe what consciousness is. All confusion in philosophy and religion is due one adopting the interpretation of another, forgetting the interpretation of another, forgetting that every experience of the indefinable and indescribable cannot be conveyed by the spoken and written word.
The fact that the forms of religion and philosophy are only interpretations tends to be forgotten; the maintenance, propagation and destruction of interpretations becomes an end itself.
The purpose of religion and philosophy is not to persuade or manipulate one to believe in another's interpretation and assertion, but to guide each one to observe and interpret his own experience; to liberate him, in fact, from the interpretation of others. Their purpose is not to include belief but to liberate from false belief.
The failure of religion and philosophy is that they become a substitute, deflecting a man from his responsibility, responsibility here being the ability to respond, the ability to observe and answer to his own experience.
For example, it is possible for a man to say: I believe in God. But only he can know what he means by the statement, He certainly cannot tell another what it means to him as an experience.
If someone asks: Do you believe in God? the appropriate answer must be: First you tell me what you mean by God'' And if one asks another to believe in his interpretation or assertion of the indescribable. For one cannot truthfully believe,be free, in the interpretations or assertion of another, If he truststhat another's interpretation or assertion is reliable evidence of the indefinable, he is deluded.
He must convince himself through his own experience.
For, at the level of bread', there are other people; at the level of consciousness', there are no other people. There are many loaves of bread and many people; but how many consciousnesses are there ?
At a level other than that of the senorily perceived world one person cannot be said truthfully to comprehend the experience of another. Two person cannot be in the same place simultaneously.
Particular speaks to particular. a part to a part; the individual, that which cannot be divided, cannot speak to another because He is One and Alone, All-One.
Can one person do another's dying for him? It is not possible for me to convince you' that you do not die; but it is possible that He does not die.
There is limitations in any philosophical interpretation/ The interpreter is limited in that he must use words in an attempt to define and describe and the receiver then has to make an interpretation of that interpretation, attempting to understand what the originator means.
There is therefore need for cation. The speaker or author and the listener or reader must be constantly mindful of his insuperable limitation. Each must exercise discipline, that of always being a disciple, one who needs to learn.
The speaker or written must use words with care, realizing that he cannot describe the Truth, only attempt to guide by demonstrating the un-true or false; and the listener or reader must neither accept nor reject any proposal until he has put it honestly to the test of his own experience, experience being that which reveals itself in any given moment
For it is not until a man begins to observe his own experience, free from indiscriminately acquired assumptions, that he can realize what is undeniable.
Words lead the mind into ignorance; they also have the power to demonstrate that ignorance. The mins led out of ingnorance dis-covers Truth.
In beggining was the Word. The Truth is before the beginning that which speaks the word in the first place.
Ultimately, a person can only discover what is undeniable through observation of his own experience, each person's experience telling him precisely what he needs to know. And this is not possible whilst the mind is occupied with beliefs adopted, assumptions made and opinions formed indiscriminately which is to say, adopted, made and formed unquestioningly without the exercise of reason.
Philosophy might be described as the examination of belief, for what a man believes in his philosophy. Every man is a philosopher in that every sane (healthy) man cines ti believe in something and what a man believes is the truth for him.To believe in something is to have faith in it or to trust it as seeming constant or reliable.
A philosopher is essentially the beliefs under which a man conducts himself since his beliefs usually rule and regulate his actions.
There are those who learn the interpretations of others, compare and contrast the interpretations of others and postulate their own interpretations without reference to their own experience. They thereby confine philosophy to a heretical study which has no practical significance.
And there are those who develop haphazard personal philosophies born of their varied experiences in the sensorily perceived world. These personal philosophies, crude and limited though they may be, serve the conduct of their day to day activities.
would any of you happen to have a link to the pdf
>the book the lock and key
i think i'm getting closer to some truth, but i believe this is a step there
>inb4 check sticky
dead link
>>16851048
What are you talking about? Sarah Dessen?
i believe it's the book of loci, but i cant be quite sure, might not be
>>16851061
Why don't you delete your thread and post again when you've figured out what it is you're looking for.
Lets say the Annunaki theory is true and there is no Abrahamic God, what about demons and ghosts?
I got dubs, yall motherfckers better answer me.
Sometimes i feel like exploring the underworld myself and go on a quest to see a demon with my own eyes. Dont want to go alone tho
I reckon... demons are like a ying and yang process we are the light souls occupying human vessels and they either don't have a physicality or are the darkness
Even if im anonymous people tend to ignore me tf is wrong with me
My best friends are ghosts. Their names are William sophie and fred. I am not fucking around they have helped me to be a better person and you can ask anything regarding them
>>16850404
When were you first diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia?
>>16850404
Which one of you is plowing Sophie?
This is probably a waste of time. This was my effort to relate my experiences with x so it doesn't suck anymore but whatever
Mind blown
Really this could be what so many have been looking for
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xrp0po_black-whole-part1_tech
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xrp1k8_black-whole-part2_tech
black Whole
Whole?
With a "W", and this is a talk by "physicist, Nassim Haramein"?
>>16850120
it's not about black holes, it's about sacred geometry or something
Someone make a meme out of this kids face
I just found this, I'll drop it and leave it. Put this number in the frequency box and post what it is. I have no clue. 7414.32 , http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/
>>16849749
Made my sound stop working. Thanks.
>>16849764
your probaly not using a proper audio browser
>>16849773
>audio browser
lost my spoopy pics folder, dump whatever spooky pictures you have
>lost my spoopy pics folder,
People always say that when they want others to post pics for them, "Sorry all my pix vanished and I forgot how to google." I mean /x/ would have to filled with people that continually suffer catastrophic HD failures to account for this thread starting technique being even remotely true...
> I forgot how to google
I had more than 1k photos, mate. One thread on /x/ can cover that
Does anyone see some strange bright shiny star, close to Venus, but a lot more brighter. Really like a small moon. I'm in Moscow if that matters - so mostly asking europeans.
I like that album.
>>16849313
no, too many clouds in the sky to see but I'm also in America.
A star went supernova and we are lucky enough to witness it as it happened in our lifetimes
I just had a dream that lasted for 2 months. However I was only asleep for 2 hours. Really fucked up shit happened in it and I don't know what to do about it. Does anyone know what this is all about
>OP has little to no concept of time.
>>16849144
Get over it because it was just a fucking dream?
>>16849155
Maybe he's a photon.
How do you know your memories are real? What if you were given fake memories just last night and everything you remember before then never actually happened?
>>16848271
physical indicators from past events that happened that i remember
Ever head of diaries, images, books etc?
>>16848282
If I gave memories I'd fake a diary for them too.
DO YOU HEAR IT FROM TIME TO TIME?
http://www.thehum.info/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bW9cyHmjeyk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJkcHwvKdv8
yes all the fucking time only when i stay up late though but usually my brain cancels it out
>>16847832
location? at wich times you hear it most? how long does it go usually?
vienna reporting in.btw
Is this "Gabriels horn"?
Sound should be made if there are changes to the EMF, Schuman field/radiation.
So if planets/whatnot align and affect it, or connect to it, there will be changes. & sound.
Lu/r9k/er here, give me your scariest shit /x/
>>16847320
There is a skeleton in your body right now controlling your movements.
>>16847331
WRONG!
Its the brain controlling the muscles that control the skelly
>>16847333
WRONG! Its the chemical reactions in your brain that control the muscles that control the skelly
