>He's never coming back
>>62988606
In the end the devil beat him
>>62988629
I get it.
>this man died of a heart attack
Literally how. He was the most relaxing person ever.
How long until new content?
>>62988406
New Pre-Rec coming tomorrow!
>>62988406
Plinkett Episode VII post mortem in late 2018
>>62988406
They're currently editing Max Landis talking about himself. It's gonna take a while.
I just watched Halloween, should I ignore the sequels?
The second one is good, the rest are shit
>>62988358
Halloween 2 and 3 are great. Four is watchable and not bad if you take it for what it is (schlocky slasher fun).
>>62988358
I like part 3 because it stars based Tom Atkins, but it isn't for everybody.
Thread theme
>https://youtu.be/2lPX5b9m7roBut seriously T&E thread
>>62988197
OO MAMA MAMA OO MAMA
>>62988311
Do you love your mama anon?
>>62988334
i love ur mom if u catch my drift ;)
![MV5BNDQ2NTM3MTAxNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNTY1NjgzNDE@._V1_SX640_SY720_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Vb13vUo.jpg "MV5BNDQ2NTM3MTAxNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNTY1NjgzNDE@. V1 SX640 SY720 [1]")
>Since crafting a potently polarising masterpiece with 2011's The Tree Of Life, Malick has become a man on a mission. A mission to stuff a movie so full of coded self-indulgence it seems like a perverse joke that has misplaced its own punchline.
Holy shit this sounds awesome. Who else is hyped?
>>62988123
>Holy shit this sounds awesome.
I don't think that was a positive review, OP
Malick is a genius and literally everything he makes is a work of art that will be cherished by further generations.
>>62988123
>>62988164
if some pleb really got that buttmad about it, it must be good
If you were one of the crew members of the spaceship that had the A.I. "Hal" onboard would you have sided with the A.I. or the crew members?
Honest question really can you sympathy with Hal and actually trust Hal or go with the crew and not trust Hal?
I know the film is old but it's really a good movie if your into that sort of stuff.
Also vintage sci-fi movies and film thread.
>>62988082
I was always on HAL's side
>>62988082
I think HAL is a perfect case of what happens when people become too reliant on technology and don't account for their flaws.If it ever came down to it, I'd side with my human colleagues, I mean the robot could be replaced anytime.
>>62988082
>can you sympathy with Hal and actually trust Hal or go with the crew and not trust Hal?
I would always sympathize with HAL, the question is would he sympathize with me
Why is this so criminally underrated? It's funny and looks great.
underrated post
CHAKA
>>62988013
I was never a Ferrell fan but for some reason I find this movie comfy
What show did you like that got cancelled while you were watching it, /tv/?
>>62987999
Almost human.
The Good Guys.
Better off Ted.
Stargate Universe.
Lights Out.
Even now I seethe just thinking about it. Fuck you Sci-Fi Channel
>>62988057
At least it got an ending.
RALPHIEEE!
inb4 3 full days of A Christmas Story on TV. How many more years are they going to show that?
>>62988001
Forever, its an American institution, like the superbowl, or sitting on your roof.
>>62988001
I hope they keep showing it till the end of time, i look foward to it every year
What's next for their careers?
>>62987958
Death, hopefully.
anal
>>62987958
Suicide
Is Luke only going to be in Force Awakens for five seconds as a sequel hook? I'm going to be really fucking mad after four years of anticipation for seeing what Luke's been up to for him only to be a cameo.
>Hey guys! Here's Luke! see you in 2017, kids! :^)
would be the worst case of blue balls ever
>>62987927
Yeah this deserved its own thread
>>62987927
Maybe more than a few seconds, maybe a few minutes, but I agree it will likely be a cliffhanger.
>>62987927
No, he's going to serve the same purpose as Spock in the new films. Meaning that he'll give a minute of exposition to help explain the plot that was nonsensical up to that point, and himself serve as a plot device to allow that retarded shit to move forward.
Need something comfy to watch. Dubs decides.
Bottle Rocket
>>62987905
Gonna reroll for this anon. It's maximum comfy.
The avengers
So the dark side IS more powerful, right?
>Luke only defeats Vader when he taps into his anger and hatred
>Sheev beats Yoda
>Maul defeats Qui Gon, a Jedi master
>Dooku stands his ground against Yoda and is able to fight two Jedi at a time, only losing to Anakin, who has already partially succumbed to the dark side
It seems that the Sith only lose when they make mistakes due to their arrogance (eg Maul and Anakin), their powers are almost always superior to the Jedi.
yoda answered this forty years ago
>No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive.
its a shortcut to being stronger, but mastery of the light side is more powerful than you can possibly imagine i.e. immortality
>>62987942
>immortality
you mean
>being a ghost who can't actually do anything and can only talk to certain people sometimes
I'll take lightning and unlimited power over that any day desu
>>62987816
It's a more powerful destructive force, but it's not sustainable.
>"Yo, spit some poetry Anon."
lovely, im always so lucky
people try to stuff me
with
garbage
but i fly away like a partridge
COO COO COO COO
its da sound of duh obese
>tfw muss hart kacken
was muss ich jetzt tun senpai?
Whatever the fuck happened to them?
They used to be super popular. Nowadays it's hard to find someone who remembers their names.
time to fap HAHA!
>>62987418
Who? Selma Blair and Sarah Michelle Gellar?
>>62987418
They started getting old even though they didn't look too old. SMG didn't appear in anything better than Buffy or the Grudge. She was in hellboy and that's about it.
