Is Kurosawa a pleb or patrician?
https://mubi.com/lists/akira-kurosawas-top-100-films
Entry level pleb shit
Neither. Average guy that likes film but it's all pretty entry level
>>64007763
What are some hardcore patrician films then?
Let's show everyone how much of a pleb we are
Nah
>>64007670
I never get why people don't just make a favorite film thread, while at the same time posting screenshots or clips from the film. That way, at least everyone knows what you're talking about.
>The 15 Best Movie Performances Of The Year
>top 5 all women
Well, it IS 2015 after all.
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/the-15-best-movie-performances-of-the-year-20151222?page=3
>tfw sub fetish
>tfw society gives me a boner now
That's just someone's opinion, the equivalent of a random post on 4chan. Reminder that all /pol/ shills are mentally ill, mentally retarded subhuman garbage with an addiction to acting like they're being victimized. You're so pathetic that some random internet blogger gets you all triggered into spamming your shill buzzwords.
>>>/pol/
Let's face it. Revenge of the Sith is a completely decent Star Wars movie. Lucas improved vastly from EpII with a plot that held itself together and characters with proper arcs. It also has the best score in the series by far and some pretty iconic scenes and shots.
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1450888572479.webm
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1450888745831.webm
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1450888934184.webm
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1450889051903.webm
With the lessons he learned in ROTS and with a possible co-director, I am certain Episode VII would've been much better in his hands than the Disney corporate soul suckers. At the worst case scenario, we would've still gotten some iconic scenes or landmarks. Now, we got nothing. Just a bland mess of forgettable shit.
>>64007393
People need to stop saying this stupid shit. Sith is every bit as bad as, if not worse than, Episodes I and II. The plot of Sith is a hodgepodge of nonsense and bad ideas that doesn't hold together at all, the characters are obnoxious and atrociously acted other than McGregor, and most importantly, the movie is lifelessly directed and mechanically edited. Badly paced, devoid of personality, rife with un-dramatic drama and unfunny humor. Episode VII was a great deal of fun, it felt fresh and exciting. And it was actually less derivative than the prequels, which were the most derivative fan-fictiony shit since Star Trek Voyager.
Your taste is in your ass, OP.
>>64007517
>Episode VII was a great deal of fun,
R
E
D
D
I
T
>>64007393
>Let's face it. The Force Awakens is a completely decent Star Wars movie. Abrams improved vastly from EpIII with a plot that held itself together and characters with proper arcs. It also has the best score in the series by far and some pretty iconic scenes and shots.
What does Rey think about sand?
>>64007368
its gritty
>>64007368
It's coarse and it gets everywhere. She likes it.
>Oh, you think the sand is your ally, you merely adopted the sand. I was born in it, moulded by it. I didn’t see the grass until I was already a woman; by then, it was nothing to me but blinding! The dunes betray you, because they belong to me. I will show you where I have made my home, I will be preparing to bring justice. Then, I will break you. Your precious armoury, gratefully accepted. We will need it. Ah yes, I was wondering what would break first. Your spirit, or your body.
>there are people who genuinely like him
why?
DUDE
WEED
LMAO
http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/12/21/vatican_newspaper_reviews_star_wars_the_force_awakens/1196031
>Although getting mostly positive reviews, especially when compared to the much-maligned prequels, not every outlet has been impressed with new film: The Vatican newspaper - L'Osservatore Romano - called it "confused and hazy."
>he review said new director J.J. Abrams' direction has only one merit: "To show, by contrast, how the direction of the previous films was elegant, balanced and, above all, appropriate."
>It also said the film is not a proper sequel, but more of reboot. "Not a classy reboot however, like Nolan's Batman, but a twisted update which fits today's tastes and a public more accustomed to sitting in front of a computer than in a cinema," the review said, adding the film seems to derive its influence from the "sloppiest current action films derived from the world of videogames."
>The newspaper went on to say Star Wars: The Force Awakens "fails most spectacularly" in its representation of evil.
>“Darth Vader and above all the Emperor Palpatine were two of the most effective villains in [the sci-fi] genre of American cinema.”
Prequels were better T B H
OP are you a big fan of the Vatican's film reviewer? What did he thing of Fury Road?
>>64007297
My favorite new meme.
Is it good?
>>64007213
It's good.
Yes
I've only seen the first season though. Comfy period piece.
>>64007213
It's really good.
Is this the most underrated action flick of the 90s?
>>64007006
Based bigelow
no but it's way up there on the list
maximum fucking comfy and the best bigelow movie
IT'S OVER JJ IS FINISHED.
>>64006984
Do manchildren really feel an emotional connection to fucking cereal? Fuck I hate my generation.
>>64006984
BUY MORE PRODUCTS CONSUME CONSUME CONSUME
>>64007099
>what happened to the beatles, the rolling stones, the who...the list goes on
Marissa got thick
compared to her early work, sure:
https://youtu.be/d4j31etjqGE?t=36m21s
This was a nearly exact copy of A New Hope...
this is a good thread OP. you've done very well.
It used elements from ANH to tell a different story, calling it an exact copy is a meme
>>64006912
I'm sure having another death star is a meme
If someone said/says season 2 of Fargo is better/betterer I instantly judge you down, is that ok?
I like both. S1 Finale was better though (not saying S2's quiet finale was bad).
>>64006788
some explain why there were aliens in s2?
is it a meme that i dont get
is it coen brothers related?
i fuckin hated that so muuuuuuuuuuch
>>64006858
an explicit parodic consideration of an alternative to Camus' theory of the absurd ya faggot
it's nice to see a show that actually expects an intelligent audience that has read books
I guess that must have fucked you guys up
So when it's all said and done, the order to watch will be IV -> V -> VI -> VII -> VIII -> IX -> I -> II -> III, right? I can't imagine it working any other way.
release order
Rogue One > IV > V > I > II > III > VI > VII > VIII > IX
>>64006801
But it seems so disjointed to do it in release order.
Alright let's settle this once and for all /tv/?
>Who is better in general?
>Who has the better tv shows?
>Who has the better movies?
>Who has the better quips?
>Who has the better female characters?
>Who has the better minority characters?
>Who is the biggest SJW?
>Who has been more damaging to nerd culture and why?
No memes, I want real answers.
>>64006737
This place is truly reddit now
>comparing jj to louis ck
What the fuck are you talking about, OP?
>Who is better in general?
Neither.
>Who has the better tv shows?
Neither.
>Who has the better movies?
Neither.
>Who has the better quips?
Neither
>Who has the better female characters?
Neither
>Who has the better minority characters?
Neither
>Who is the biggest SJW?
Whedon, JJ only cares about shekels.
>Who has been more damaging to nerd culture and why?
This is hard because Whedon is almost single handedly responsible for tumblr but I'm going to give it to JJ because he went out of his way to ruin the two biggest SF franchises in the history of time.
