Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 322. page
- Home
- Board: /lit/ - Literature
- Reading: Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 322. page
Literary Confession Thread
I think the opening chapter to Atlas Shrugged is the best one I've ever read.
Fuck Catholics
I think DFW is one of the worst authors that I've read.
Sup fags.
Pic related shows my recent purchases. What should I read next. Ignore the Pynchon books, I read them already.
Dont make Hegel a main book if you have the time to read two books at once.
Do people seriously think Hegel is just something you read in between random novels?
>>8134199
>The Magnificent Third Rail
He actually bought it, the absolute madman!
about to read this for the first time...
what should i expect?
anime shit
lot of chronicles and autistic amount of facts, its not that much "spiritual shit" actually its more about history
Look I have no idea at all about it, I'm just here For reading some opinions about Islam.
I'll just start with a couple questions
>Is it theologically more perfect or it represents an improvement in front of the Christianity of the 7th century?
>Is it a totalitarian religion/cult? Why?
>Is islam and particularly Sunni islam a religion of peace?
>tell me about sufism that shit seems interesting
>>8132305
1. It's a downgrade to theology as a whole. More warlike and advocating a clear intolerance of other faiths, and have been a source of strife ever since their inception.
2. It has no real clerical hierarchy like Catholics, but in terms of secular power it is really totalitarian. See The Caliph throughout the Middle ages.
3. No. Read the Koran. They make mention of slaying Infidels, burning them, and cutting off the hands of theives. Not to mention stoning gays.
4. It's another branch of Islam. I don't know why a quick Google or Wiki look can't help you.
>>8132305
1 no
2 yes
3 no
4 no
Islam is the mirror image of Christianity, much more so than even Phariseeism.
Phariseeism was merely hypocrisy and empty legalism focused on this world alone. When Rabbinical Talmudic "Judaism" mutated from this poison base in the Middle Ages, it created a kind of amoral tribal sociopathy, bent on infiltrating and destroying host societies. You can't accuse "Jews" of hypocrisy because they have no morality, not even legalism, just pure materialism.
Satan decided to take the opposite approach for the other prong of his attack on Christendom. Islam serves the devil as an attack on Christianity from without. Instead of a subversive subculture, Islam was designed to mobilize entire societies against Christians. Like Talmudism, there is no hypocrisy in Islam because Muslims have no inner spiritual life or morality, but their amorality is constructed in such a way that all of their malice is directed towards Christians. It's like the difference between high-functioning sociopaths (Muslims) who protect their own but prey on those they consider outsiders, and low-functioning sociopaths ("Jews") who are motivated purely by individual evil without any real concept of community.
When Satan was whispering the Koran in Muhammed's ear, he made sure to pervert and corrupt and deny every Christian doctrine possible. The false god of Islam, Allah, is a Bedouin moon demon elevated to monotheist status. This avatar of Lucifer serves as a central idol in mockery of the Triune God of Christianity. Islam truly is the denial and inversion of Christianity.
ITT: Unpopular opinions regarding literature that you wholeheartedly hold.
Prepare for ruffled feathers.
Heart Of Darkness is bad.
The best bits of Blood Meridian is the shock value. The book holds very little else in redeeming quality.
Neil Gaiman is bound to go down as one of neo-America's classic writers and he will be cited and quoted 50 years after his death. He's partly enjoyable but mainly because he panders to Tumblr-tards.
The Dark Materials trilogy is really the only YA-fiction people should read outside of young adulthood.
Conan Doyle was right: Sherlock is a bad series of books.
People on /lit/ don't discover literature themselves and rely heavily on what they find on charts and what they hear about on /lit/, which is why everyone just reads the same shit over and over.
I bet you niggas can't even tell me who Yorick is without looking it up. I bet none of you actually read.
>>8132228
Complete Akira > Watchmen and other Alan Moore-core.
>Billy Butter has a lover; without no hands he lies above her, fucking lightly as a plover, first his sister, then her mother. Here's Ben. There ain't no law in the Redeemer's church against a good fuck, is there Furber? Why of course not, Luther, only it's got to be your wife, and beyond five inches it's a sin to enjoy it. By christ you're a good sport, Furb. By christ you are. Pat. Hey boys, ain't Furb a good sport? Squeeze. By christ. You can play at our picnic. Rum a dum. Rum a dum. Rum a dum dum.
what the fuck is wrong with him?
Did I write this?
good stuff
Such good old boy
Very bluegrass
Wow
Instead of buzzwords and memes, please could people articulate clearly exactly why they enjoy or dislike/hate Cormac McCarthy's works?
Repeating "Tortilla YeCarthy is a hack" doesn't quite get your point across, my main man.
Tortilla YeCarthy is a hack
Tortilla YeCarthy is a hack
Tortilla YeCarthy is a hack
So how do I into legitimate, non-extremist feminist theory, and it's criticism. The topic comes up literally every fucking day and I need to build up my well of knowledge 2 bcome an edgelord
Simone de Beauvoir
Derrida
Foucault
Judith Butler
That's about it
>>8143594
Irigaray is also interesting. She'd also piss off a lot of extremist feminists.
And I dunno something like Delusions of gender.
>tfw she'll never sit on your face
>let's read this through the lense of feminist theory
>let's read this through the lense of psychoanalytic theory
>let's read this through the lense if Marxist theory
>let's read this through the lense of queer theory
>etc.
>tfw we will never again read things solely from the perspective of genetically superior white, naturally born heterosexual, financially well-off, able-bodied, cis-gendered autonomous self-identical reified egos whose desires and motivations are always transparent and non-ideologically and non-interpersonally constituted and whose actions are always rationally derived and easily
explained
Why is critical theory and college so retarded?
Pic related is Pepe the frog man he's a friend of /r9k/ and represents virginity
>>8143273
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_of_Resentment
Blame cultural marxism.
>>8143286
It has nothing to do with Marxism which is a materialist dialectic. Call it neoliberal identity politics, which it is. Of course that doesn't quite have the same eerie feel to it for morons
I love you guys, I really do. See you in the next chapter.
>>8143156
w-we love you too, anon
Don't kill yourself Holden, there are too many pastries left and I can't eat them all by myself.
Not if I see you first.
Minority/women authors that are /lit approved or most /lit approved? I want to make sure that I'm able to know some of these authors so I don't get called out by women calling me a white male sexist/racist etc. So far, I've only liked Joan Didion, Gertrude Stein and Virginia Woolf. No black authors yet. You got any names for me, my main men?
Women are easy; there are tons of talented female authors. Yours plus:
Djuna Barnes
Bronte(s)
Dickinson
Austen
Eliot
O'Connor
I'm going to leave out Hispanics in this list since they are so numerous. Minorities/Black:
Ellison
Baldwin
James
Ishiguro
Mishima
Rushdie
Naipaul
Morrison
Delany
That's just a quick, semi-drunken list off the top of my head at 2 am. If you are actually thinking about it, you should be able to come up with many more.
>>8143135
Shitskins can't write at all. White women, while better, are essentially children and have the brain capacities of such.
>>8143194
>He's never read The Invisible Man
>He's never read Things Fall Apart
>He's never read Native Son
I fucking pity you my good friend
What books should I read if I want to learn in-depth about western history?
>>8142950
Start with the Greeks.
>>8142950
>>8142978
Apparently this guy is a delusional Russophile STEMautist.
Only 10 more pages, then I'm done with Platons Politeia and even though this is probably shitposting I have to say it,
WHAT A FUCKING PRETENTIOUS CUNT WHO ISN'T EVEN CAPABLE OF THE MOST SIMPLEST FORMS OF LOGIC. IF PHILOSOPHY WOULDN'T HAVE GOTTEN BETTER LATER ON I WOULD HAVE KILLED MYSELF ALREADY. HOLY FUCKING SHIT! WHY IS THIS ALLOWED?
Most simplest is wrong, op. No wonder you read Plato
>>8142823
English is not my mother tongue and I wrote this in a rage. I can't cope with the fact that I just wasted an entire day with this shitty book. Did I gain anything at all?
>>8142823
Also, please stop insulting me. I'm not really self-confident so if you keep going I'll actually kill myself.
Why don't /lit/ anons include their publications (novels, lit mags) in their posts? Is it because they're not good enough to be published?
prolly.
>>8142689
This thread is basically internet bullying. Don't come in here and mock the entire community.
Yes. Or, rarely, when they are published, they'll make an ambiguous claim that seems to imply that they're a legitimate author on the road to living out the /lit/ dream, and then when pressed, they reveal that the thing they've written is some trashy fantasy/scifi novel.
I just finished reading Things Fall Apart and was moved deeply by it. What are some other African author's, or specific works by them that are well regarded? This is honestly the only book by a native African that I know of.
I hear that there's been a growing science fiction scene within the past couple of decades or so and that sounds wild.
>>8142634
Learn French, so you can read decent African authors, not Anglophone trash.
Can I ask you why you liked it?
It was totally empty trash for me.
People have said good things about Zakes Mda and Tayeb Salih but I didn't like either of these authors.
You know Afrikaans people are native Africans, right? They've been living in South Africa for hundreds of years, just as long as most Bantu people. If I'm not allowed to be racist and call 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants in my country "foreigners" then by the same token people should extend the same respect to the Afrikaans.
They haven't lived in the Netherlands for a long, long, time.
