Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 750. page
- Home
- Board: /k/ - Weapons
- Reading: Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 750. page
well, it's natural in russia say that ak is an excellent weapon (much proud), but what are you guys really thinking about it?
It's shit
>>29537101
tell me why
>>29537199
It's shit
The Final Countdown (1980) Kirk Douglas and Martin Sheen
During a training op, the USS Nimitz is hurdled back in time to December 6th, 1941, just outside Pearl Harbour. F-14's vs Zeros fights occur. Lots of philosophical debates about taking the war to the Japanese taskforce heading to Pearl is discussed.
The movie had full cooperation of the US Navy and so the film makers got access to the ship, her some of her crew and all the planes and helicopters they used in 1980.
>>29536969
>The Final Countdown (1980) Kirk Douglas and Martin Sheen
Dicktease: The movie
>A boy and his dog
>The pentagon wars
>>29536969
fucking loved that movie, F14's chewing up zeros gets my dick hard
FREEMEN OF AMERICA:
DAILY REMINDER that the reason for the Constitutional protection of the right to bear arms is not about shooting sports, or hunting, nor even self-defense; these are all ancillary, though equally protected due to, to the primary purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
THE PRIMARY PURPOSE of the right to bear arms is to DEFEND AGAINST TYRANNY AND ENSURE LIBERTY. Our FREEDOM was not given to us, it was TAKEN from the tyrants and FOUGHT FOR by the patriots. We secured these rights through the Constitution, and at the time of the federal government's inception these rights were thought to be so obvious that there was actually a discussion about whether or not the bill of rights was even needed. IT WAS NEEDED; our right to bear arms is under CONSTANT THREAT and are already under violation by unconstitutional laws such as the NFA and bureaus such as ATF.
NEVER justify the 2nd Amendment without asserting the PRIMARY REASON for its defense without qualification: PROTECTION OF FREEDOM FROM TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENTS.
The government can and will turn tyrannical at the drop of a hat, under any suitable justification: youtube.com watch?v=-taU9d26wT4
Soldiers of the US Military, you are sworn to defend the Constitution and must disobey illegal orders if they are given: youtube.com watch?v=-taU9d26wT4
>At a time, when our lordly masters in Great Britain will be satisfied with nothing less than the deprivation of American freedom, it seems highly necessary that something should be done to avert the stroke, and maintain the liberty, which we have derived from our ancestors. But the manner of doing it, to answer the purpose effectually, is the point in question. That no man should scruple, or hesitate a moment, to use arms in defence of so valuable a blessing, on which all the good and evil of life depends, is clearly my opinion.
>-George Washington
Dude, it's just a hobby. Stop pretending that the Big Bad Fed is out to get you. You're making us sensible gun owners look bad.
I don't need my hobby banned to death because some fat neckbeard with an SKS shot up a post office or police station "in the name of liberty" or some bullshit.
>>29536951
Good goyim
>>29536951
This.
Also,
>>/pol/
So... /k/ lets say at one point someone leaves the army and joins a PMC, how fucked are they? I would love some insight from you /k/ucks
>>29536619
Private>Public every time.
>>29536619
Fuck off.
>>29536653
Explain?
Finally got a video edited togeather for the MacSaw project.
This is a sped up version set to Bethoven's 9th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbIRrmbNNcg
I will be putting out the full length video with audio from the build but it's like an hour and a half of footage...
>>29536469
Is that a pre-82 MAC
>>29536469
Closeup Detail of Chainsaw charging Handle... Yep Thats a Sthil
>>29536469
Why would you do this to a perfectly good Hesse Arms gun? They make great stuff.
What does /k/ think about pistol caliber carbines?
Whats your guys opinion on the mpx?
>a proprietary overpriced AR15 in a single anemic caliber
Nah.
>>29536391
The same thing we always think about them.
They are toys and fail in every aspect when compared to SBRs.
Get an SBR, fagboy.
PCC came about as an advantage tactic for the U.S. Cavalry during the Indian wars. They were easy to handle and maneuver atop a horse mount.
Since then, they have come back and forth into play, competing with sub machine guns. Their latest bout was lost when Sheridan tankers opted for the .45 caliber grease gun.
Nevertheless, PCCs are still relevant and universally cool.
Concrete is pretty awesome substance to build bunkers and other fortifications. Cheap, versitile and usually easy to incorporate into any surrounding.
But the problem is that it's... not all that durable on the long term. if you look at bunkers of WW2 or so (or even younger ones) they quickly fall into disrepair. It just can't take the wear and tear of time. The climate and even mild acidity of rain will quickly crumble them.
Where as if you look at Ye Olde Schoole castles, they are pretty fine even after centuries of poor maintenance. They used STONE to craft those things, and while it was more difficult and expensive to work on, once it was build it was pretty much maintenance free for centuries.
So I was wondering if there was some modern technique to make "weather-proof" concrete, for structures that are meant to be there for not just 50 years but for 300 years later?
If we forget about the artillery, anc solely focus on "hwo to make things last for centuries" does concrete have any room in that discussion? Or are you more or less forced to rely on STONE?
Tell me the answer to the Riddle of Concrete!
Pictured: a bunker not 100 years old.
>>29536303
The Romans built concrete piers and docks that have survived over 1000 years submerged in salt water. The key was the volcanic ash used in the formula.
The modern evolution of this is geopolymer concrete, which should last pretty much forever. It actually incorporates water into the chemical structure instead of just being activated by it.
Another problem is the steel rebar. Once water infiltrates the concrete (at a rate of about 1 inch per year iirc) and hits the rebar, it begins to rust, swell, and spall. This kills the structure.
I love basalt rebar and basalt fibers. It is slightly more expensive than the steel rebar but has many advantages and will never rust or deform. Fireproof, better tensile strength, lasts forever. It is also the same density as concrete so the fibers mix easily and distribute evenly, and the rebar doesn't sink or float when you pour the mold, unlike steel or fiberglass.
Geopolymer concrete + basalt rebar = buildings and infrastructure that last effectively forever.
>>29536556
I had NEVER heard of BASALT rebar / basalt fibers. Or Geoplymer concrete.
Many thanks for these words I can use in my web-searches.
here, have some gun-porn.
>>29536556
Any idea how long the epoxy coatings they have started placing on rebar should last?
Just ordered one of these from KVAR, fixed stock model for $699. Got two 12 round magazines for it as well. Any /k/omrads have one of these things? Also, recommend me some furniture/chokes/muzzle devices.
>>29535981
Ill give you a nice choke
$10
That barrel just seems too long.
>>29536002
there's only one vepr choke that sells for that cheap
Fine folk of /k/
I will be moving from Western Pennsylvania to Lower Michigan in a few weeks.
What I wish to know is how gun laws/culture are different there. I know Michigan reciprocates PA carry permits but will I have to get a new one? What is NFA like there?
For reference I'm moving to an upper middle class neighborhood in the Detroit Metro Area.
Welcome to the mitten anon.
What city?
Some parts are lib-tards.. the further north you go the more gun boners you encounter.
>>29535894
I was in Michigan two nights ago watching the Red Wings beat the life out of the Philadelphia Flyers. Everyone was friendly.
>>29535894
>>29536479
This.
Michigan is a pretty decent gun state, just general stuff regarding limitations. No auto, need licensing for carry and concealed, tax stamps for suppressor, SBR, AOW.
As for whether or not you'll need an entirely new license, I'm unsure. I wouldn't think so, but hopefully a more informed anon can assist.
If you were to equip an army in 1909 (and you are given the full hindsight of a person living in this day) with small arms, what would you equip them with?
They want pistols, rifles, light and heavy machine guns.
>>29535834
Fuck that nigga I am playing the winning lottery numbers for the next 107 years
>>29535920
this
/thread
>>29535920
1910 rolls around, you die in the ensuing war.
They especially make a point of hanging the lottery winning, capitalist pigdog.
/Ak/ Anime Weapons
Operator Edition
Have you read Ajin or seen the anime?
Its pretty damn /k/
>>29535752
Ajin got animated?
>>29535763
Yes, this Saturday is the last episode.
>>29535752
Please return to your containment board and brow beat whoever left the door open.
WANT
DON'T NEED
BUT I FUCKEN WANT
Related:
Would I be a retard for purchasing a Steyr L9?
I will be purchasing one of these two in the very near future but I cant decide which to buy first. They are both within my price range and can be had new or milsurp. Which one should I buy first? My goal is to complete the set of classic American service rifles.
If you had ever handled an M1, this wouldn't be a question. The M1 Garand is the greatest battle implement ever devised.
>>29535632
Garand is a much easier rifle to maintain overall in my opinion. The Carbine can be a little finnicky in the disassembly process. I've owned 3 GI carbines and it can be quite difficult to remove the trigger housings from the lugs on the receiver.
However, the Carbine will be a more 'practical" rifle for the money due to it's box magazine feature. Be warned though, GI mags can be pricey ($25-$40 used) and a lot of the commercial mags out there are junk, but you can still get decent ones for $12-$15 if you look around for ones with good reviews.
>>29535667
I have shot both and owned a Carbine. Its just a tough decision to make becuase I like them both equally as much
Give three good reasons and one moderately okay reason as to why full auto assault rifles like this shouldn't me banned
>>29535603
>one moderately okay reason
kekd
The right of the people to keep and bear arms all not be infringed.
SCOTUS has upheld the 2nd to define arms as common armaments among the military.
Hughes Amendment was passed illegally.
Nobody has ever been killed by a registered machine gun.
>full auto assault weapons like this
>posts an M1
Hey guys, was thinking of fortifying the area around my drive way, think ditches would work?
>>29535399
ditches like tanktraps or ditches like trench line
>>29535399
Sure but you will need to keep up with your ditch diving drills.
>>29535399
Yeah just make sure none of your friends park their truck in the field of fire
![2666578[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/6x2VK8U.jpg "2666578[1]")
