Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 490. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Your in WW2 and you see this tank coming up towards your sherman while being escorted by smaller tigers and panzers.
What do you do?
Nope myself across a bridge.
>>30008233
Yeah. As much as i'd like to die. I think i choose life.
Good luck with that crack SS division.
>>30008233
Wait until a P-47 shreds their column, proceed to march on Berlin
>http://www.engadget.com/2016/05/19/the-navy-is-arming-its-submarines-with-blackwing-spy-drones/
>The Navy recently announced its plans to deploy an armada of stealthy spy drones from AeroVironment aboard its submarines and UUVs. Specifically, the Navy is going with the small-form "Blackwing" UAV, a four-pound flyer with a 20 inch wingspan that collapses down to fit into a 3-inch diameter launch tube. It will use its array of electro-optical and infrared sensors as well as its anti-spoofing GPS capability...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>30008214
How do we get them back after deployment? Are they recoverable? Or is it $40 million down the tube everytime a sub captain wants to take a look around up top?
>>30008214
That's gay.
We need mini sub drones that launch from the torpedo tubes that then launch their own little mini drones from tiny ICBM like missile tubes
>>30008294
I figure they're probably disposable and "cheap" with off the shelf hardware for the most part when they inevitably wash up on China's fancy new airstrips they're building in the SCS.
Anyone try to look fashionable and look hipstery whilst oc'ing?
I think it blows peoples minds to see that gun owners aren't all fat neckbeards.
Pic is me
>>30008152
Well op, if you dont look like a fat neckbeard you look like a faggot.
You sir, are definitely not a neckbeard!
I bet you carry a 1911 you faggot
That's an interesting thought. I'd assume it'd have to be a hipstery gun as well. Pearl handled revolvers?
Why do some people think Hickok is a fudd when he's not?
Because newfags don't know what Fudd means.
the worst newfags think /k/ invented fudd and mallninja.
I hate newfags
Southern accent/demeanor and the way he gets excited when blowing shit apart.
>>30008157
I was thinking it's because he's old
Dear /k/,
I challenge you to find a knife as useless as the TOPS lil Roughneck.
(Mallninja and Zombiefetish cutlery does not count, also only single bladed knives.)
That doesn't look that ridiculous, considering "other" knives out there. Looks more like a small, sharpened, prybar. Made of good steel too. Trying to fit into a edc/utility market maybe?
I wouldn't ever buy it though. Handle's too short to be useful to me, blade's too thick to shave wood and too short to baton (I prefer not to baton though). Most importantly, it's waaaaaaaaay too heavy for what it is.
But if someone gave me one, I wouldn't spit on them. There are far more "offensive" knives...
I might have a couple. Will post pics when i get back to my computer.
>>30008659
>tobbacco pipe
...How?
does your country shitpost military propaganda on youtube
finland yes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeKPIRopsAQ
>>30007623
>kapteeni
>>30007623
finlan
yes
>>30007623
Since when did the Finns accepted foreign troops in their programs?
Who would win in an all out war? USA or China
>in reality, no spam nukes
>present day
America has no single point of failure, infrastructurally speaking. You blow the three gorges dam and half of China drowns, the other half starves because all the rice is now ruined by the flooding.
>>30007473
depends, if China was invading the US, the US would have an easy victory no doubt.
>>30007473
China doesn't even have a single aircraft carrier, correct? The US can't be defeated by anyone, if it's war to the death as you say, and not a limited engagement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T42-FIphKM
Neat
>>30007458
>Swecuck knowing how to operate an AR, down to forward assisting the bolt home
Well I never
>cucked lands now knowing how to use firearms without owning them
we just need to do the liberator thing and air drop firearms to revolt against the moslem hordes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwg6RTjCH7g
Also here's a whiny faggot that's scared of guns.
Warning: May make you upset.
Thoughts on the kel tec sub 2000? I just got my PAL (Canadian gun licence) in the mail and im looking for a plinker/defense gun. I personally like it because it's one of the only rifles that uses pistol mags and can therefore legally hold ten rounds and mag capacity is important to me. If you have experience with them give me some input.
>>30007281
Manipulations are a pain in the ass
The charging handel is on the wrong place and hard as fuck. reloading on a short time is possible but difficult.
everything beside of this is good up to top
>>30007311
Ahh I could totally see how charging it would be a pain.
Anyone with opinions on the Beretta cx 9 storm?
>>30007356
looks ugly as hell
Should I /k/?
>>30007272
Yes
>>30007272
No
Those IO imports are junk.
If you have a lathe and a welder you can make one for cheap. Ezpz.
Go and buy the centerfiresystems parts kit and the millitarygunsupply parts kit. $270.
Then get a 16" 9mm barrel blank. $40.
Then weld in a denial bar, weld the reciever back together, drill out the firing pin, mill off the original sear, and install a striker system / hammer fcg
>>30007320
But I have neither nor do I have the skills to use them....
>Funstore has * ammo on shelves.
>Does not have any in * for sale.
>>30007267
>Gun store only has fudd calibers
>>30007267
u wot?
>>30007267
>limited to one brick of .22 per person
![bJnQMag[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/U5sYkUJ.jpg "bJnQMag[1].jpg")
What animals would be most weaponizable?
>>30007081
Humans
>>30007081
>Inb4 ants
Haven't you seen movies? Fucking dinosaurs bitch.
What if you replaced the ICBMs with railgun turrets that extend out of the submarine while surfaced. You would make it so the Railgun module fits into the existing tubes.
They already have the SSGNs with a longer range but the railguns can do a lot more. A railgun sub could surface and engage almost any target within 200km. The rail guns can target aircraft, missiles, surface ships and ground targets. You could surface and fire at 24 different targets or saturate a single target with hundreds of rounds.
By having them on a nuclear sub most of the downsides are...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
This shitty navy threads all happen within sprees.
Wtf?
A rail gun just fires a metal slug undergoing projectile motion. Firing it at something 200km away is pretty much just going to be the slug whacking it with whatever energy it has from its terminal velocity.
>[LIQUID OCELOT INTENSIFIES]
![HMS-Queen-Elizabeth-528700[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nFXNfua.jpg "HMS-Queen-Elizabeth-528700[1].jpg")
Lack of Catobar and nuclear power isn't even the problem.
QE has zero anti ship,air or subsurface weapons and only has a couple of CIWS to defend it.
Every other carrier out there, from Admiral Kuznetsov and Liaoning to Indias Vikrant and Italy's Cavour if met 1-1 would be able to chase of Queen Elizabeth.
> But anon, carriers travel in battle groups!
yes they do, but the Royal Navy has only 6 Daring Destroyers to escort the ill equipped carrier, of which only 3 have access to harpoons.
These harpoons were only added...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
![putin-medvedev-laughing[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/e76t1bu.jpg "putin-medvedev-laughing[1].jpg")
>>30006864
> Largest ever Royal Navy warships unveiled to 'scare off Putin'
Lol
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516953/warships-unveiled-to-scare-off-Putin-hms-queen-elizabeth-prince-of-wales-carrier
Honest no troll here
What worries me about England's new carrier is that it's so limited.
It's a port queen that's just there to remind the world that England STILL has a capable Navy
If England was smart and honest they wouldn't build this boat. They focus their money on top of the line defensive weapons.
England would have this insane air defense mega-project that was top of the line better than the Americans. It was limited sure,but it was a beast of a weapon and it made England pretty much impossible to invade.
But...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>30006893
>But instead we get this "Carrier"
Carriers, plural.
> Its not a blue water weapon,its a show of force and its anemic
You're just fucking trolling at this point.
Hey /k/,
A few weeks ago I bought a couple of 1917 Enflieds on the cheap but they're both sporterized. Kinda new to the hasguns club, any tips on where/how to find original wood furniture? Thanks in advance.
pls
>>30006758
>>30006815
They are both Fucked beyond saving, Sad. You could take the one on the left to a gun smith so he can take that front sight off and you can sell it to someone who needs one. Enjoy them for what they are now. Hope you didnt pay much for both
>>30006845
Paid a little less than $300 for the pair.
Maybe I'll just get an SKS.
