Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 352. page
- Home
- Board: /k/ - Weapons
- Reading: Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 352. page
What do you eat when you go to the range? I usually pack jerky.
crab legs and funnyins
I don't; I can go 5 hours without eating
>>30215652
Nothing cuz I'm not a tard who accumulates unnecessarily high amounts of lead in my body
Hey /k/ so I just bought this Revelation Model 120 for $20. Is it basically a Marlin 60? Also how the hell do you adjust the rear sight? Can I keep the bolt open or should I just jam an empty casing into it? (For range safety reasons)
lift the tab, and slide the rear fin. Sights aren't really marked for distances.
>>30215520
you should be able to manually lock the bolt back
its a little fiddly but you pull it back and push the charging handle in
>>30215520
First, probably needs a good cleaning. There should be an arrow (<--) stamped into the charging handle. Pull bolt back and push in on handle to lock bolt. The rear sight is classic .22 rifle. Drift for windage, stepped wedge for elevation. The wedge is probably missing. Can find replacement almost anywhere.
Looking to replace my dead siglite sights on my old p226 and I was wondering how the Sig X-Rays hold up to the reputable Trijicon HD's
Can anyone who owns both give some insight or some form of comparison? I would assume the Trijicons are much better built but I want to give the X-Rays a try considering they're $50 cheaper with a front sight that is straight green.
Are glow in the dark sights a fucking fad in the handgun world or something? Every time I search armslist or something there's always a faggot selling their glock or sig with trijicon sights which increases the value $100. Fuck off you'll never use them.
>>30215545
You're right nobody ever gets mugged in the dark
>>30215592
Or looks down their sight for that matter
Watching COPS.
What handgun is this, /k/?
>>30215482
slav shit
>>30215482
How do you not recognize a Macaroon?
looks like a mak
if you look closely it says "stealing" on the side
wat
No, because radios and air support are.
>>30215355
I think during the Iran-Iraq war there were reports of helicopters fighting each other.
Only in that Nicholas Cage Movie
So why haven't you bought a SIG MPX yet?
>brace that looks like the original
>no tax stamp needed
>cheap plinking
>4 points of contact for home defense
>completely concealable and great for gray man in SHTF
>you already know how to use it because of AR controls
Extars are 1/3rd the cost
>>30215178
>9mm
>>30215178
Because I own a B&T APC9
Why hasn't anyone made a special snowflake rifle that loads magazine on the top yet? If bullpups could do that they wouldn't be so ugly.
How to I convince papa to get me a Smith & Wesson Model 627. /k/ommandos?
>>30215041
I was looking at one a few years ago, but I got a chiappa rhino instead.
>>30215078
Is that better? Or more concealable
Tell him you want a Model 629 instead and then he'll be so proud that you're no longer a faggot he'll get you the nice .44 Mag.
Alright, so a couple years ago when I was but a young fag I had a bitch of girlfriend. One day I decided to break up with her because she was a total bitch and wasted all my money. I tell to be out of my apartment by the end of the day and when I get back from work she took some of my shit as well. It was mainly CDs, DVDs, and shit but she took my Cobray M-11(Was time where I thought I could trust her with its location). So around January this year I get a phone call saying from the police all the way in Tennessee saying they found a weapon registered to me being pawned. No details how it got there but after the investigation into the pawn shop I finally got it back today. I shall celebrate his return by firing many a rounds at the range this weekend.
Happy for you anon. I watched many an 80's action movies as a youngin', so compact smg's have always been my favorite.
The prodi/k/al son: a parable.
>>30215070
>I watched many an 80's action movies as a youngin', so compact smg's have always been my favorite.
this tbqh
X54r is so boring and a drag, I prefer 44 magnum
>>30214719
>no irons, only optic
What was so hard about making it still retain the looks and function of the base nugget?
>>30214719
Sleep well noble soldier. Your sacrifice won't be forgotten.
>>30214745
The barrel would have been too thick, and the wood too brittle after being widened. I elected to keep it weighted as such, and putting a forward optic knowing the limitations of the cartridge.
That said, the rifle was horribly sporterized and in terrible condition before I even got my hands on it. So I gave it a second life
I just talked with an ex-mercenary which was in africa in the 80's, ask me anything you want.
Is role playing on /k/ really that fun?
>>30214593
Nah, we already had that guy do an AMA over 3 threads while he failed to provide a single scrap of proof.
Why would anyone ask YOU anything? You're a nobody who happened to meet someone else.
Anyone have more pictures of backpacks like this? I have a plain-jane 5.11 rush 12 that I want to put some random bullshit on so when I hike the local mountains I can feel cool. So i need some inspiration.
>>30214574
Hanging a bunch of shit off a pack to make a messy clusterfuck is not tacticool or tactical.
It is quite literally the opposite of high speed, low drag.
>>30214600
that's the joke you fuckin retard
>I want to put some random bullshit on so when I hike the local mountains I can feel cool.
Are you some kind of retarded twat?
Any good AM magazines for the SKS that don`t have feeding problems and aren`t a China Star? Currently running a `78 Yugo M59/66.
>>30214568
Just get an Ak you insufferable imbecile
>>30216075
>>Hurr buy a completely new rifle poorfag
>>30214568
>magazine
>SKS
In the event of a large-scale war between two modern armies, how quickly would both sides run out of the ultra expensive ultra modern equipment and resort to cheaper equipment?
I.E Eurofighters -> F-16s (or cheaper)
>>30214308
Well large scale war between 2 major up to date country's would be a fight between who would blink first.
As always the attacker will have the disadvantage unless they surprise their rival. Which with modern tech and spy hardware it will be very very hard to mount a surprise attack with large enough force that it would make a difference.
In order for a surprise attack to happen, the opposing country would have no reason to believe they would be betrayed and would leave their army's at home instead of at the border.
From which the attacking force would focus on destroying or capturing their equipment. Forcing the defending force into a guerilla war with limited and out-dated equipment and supplies.
The defending force would have to start cutting off supply lines and destroying bridges/roads to slow down enemy movement to even stand a chance.
Hiding in the woods would do you no good seeing as thermal optics can point you out without a problem. Meaning most fights would be in the cities close to civilians resulting in civilian casualty's.
The offensive force would see such acts as terrorism and most likely use it as an excuse to bring in more supply's and support for their cause.
All in all it would take only a matter of weeks before the modern tech gets wiped out. Making any form of real resistance futile and just seen as pointless death.
You can't just win with an army, you need support of your people to.
>>30214308
I have always questioned that myself...
Other fantasy I have is planes become piss-easy to hack at a distance and we have to resort to modernized prop fighters.
>>30215848
That's why they still need an analog switch to arm the weapons on even the most digital of fighters and drones. You cannot hack arm and fire from any modern aircraft without being there to flip the switch.
It's a good thing that most generals are paranoid.
Is there any reason the old C79 is so expensive other than muh CF raifu cosplay?
Leaf BUMP
>>30214259
Tritium.
>>30214297
HAHAHA what the fuck
